COVID-19 Megathread 5: The Trumps catch COVID-19
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 09:41:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  COVID-19 Megathread 5: The Trumps catch COVID-19
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 ... 201
Author Topic: COVID-19 Megathread 5: The Trumps catch COVID-19  (Read 269179 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2575 on: May 22, 2020, 07:52:57 PM »

If you take the position that the first Amendment applies to state governments, then I don't see how forcibly closing places of worship is constitutional. I think the first and 2nd Amendments are just too broad the way they're stated.

The first Amendment doesn't exempt churches from generally applicable rules, regulations, and laws.
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,632
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2576 on: May 22, 2020, 08:29:08 PM »

If the law is they all have to close I think it's a violation.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,011
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2577 on: May 22, 2020, 08:31:54 PM »

Republican suburban outreach reaches Texas.

Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2578 on: May 22, 2020, 08:35:30 PM »

Republican suburban outreach reaches Texas.



Putting ourselves and our loved ones at risk to own the libs. Apparently the whole first world is killing their own citizens to hurt Trump.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2579 on: May 22, 2020, 08:41:04 PM »

The updated numbers for COVID-19 in the U.S. are in for 5/22 per: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

I'm keeping track of these updates daily and updating at the end of the day, whenever all states finish reporting for that day.

Δ Change: Day-by-day Growth or Decline or COVID-19 Spread/Deaths.
  • IE: Are we flattening the curve enough?

Σ Increase: A day's contribution to overall percentage growth of COVID-19 cases/deaths.
  • IE: What's the overall change in the total?

<Last Numbers for 3/26-3/28 in this Post>
<Last Numbers for 3/29-4/4 in this Post>
<Last Numbers for 4/5-4/11 in this Post>
<Last Numbers for 4/12-4/18 in this Post>
<Last Numbers for 4/19-4/25 in this post>
<Last Numbers for 4/26-5/2 in this post>
<Last Numbers for 5/3-5/9 in this post>

5/10: <Sunday>
  • Cases: 1,367,638 (+20,329 | Δ Change: ↓20.35% | Σ Increase: ↑1.93%)
  • Deaths: 80,787 (+750 | Δ Change: ↓47.27% | Σ Increase: ↑0.94%)

5/11:
  • Cases: 1,385,834 (+18,196 | Δ Change: ↓10.49% | Σ Increase: ↑1.33%)
  • Deaths: 81,795 (+1,008 | Δ Change: ↑34.40% | Σ Increase: ↑1.25%)

5/12:
  • Cases: 1,408,155 (+22,321 | Δ Change: ↑22.67% | Σ Increase: ↑1.61%)
  • Deaths: 83,377 (+1,582 | Δ Change: ↑56.94% | Σ Increase: ↑1.93%)

5/13:
  • Cases: 1,430,348 (+22,193 | Δ Change: ↓0.57% | Σ Increase: ↑1.58%)
  • Deaths: 85,197 (+1,820 | Δ Change: ↑15.44% | Σ Increase: ↑2.18%)

5/14:
  • Cases: 1,456,828 (+26,480 | Δ Change: ↑19.32% | Σ Increase: ↑1.85%)
  • Deaths: 86,901 (+1,704 | Δ Change: ↓6.37% | Σ Increase: ↑2.00%)

5/15 (Yesterday):
  • Cases: 1,483,736 (+26,908 | Δ Change: ↑1.62% | Σ Increase: ↑1.85%)
  • Deaths: 88,479 (+1,578 | Δ Change: ↓7.39% | Σ Increase: ↑1.82%)

5/16:
  • Cases: 1,505,033 (+21,297 | Δ Change: ↓20.85% | Σ Increase: ↑1.44%)
  • Deaths: 89,511 (+1,032 | Δ Change: ↓34.60% | Σ Increase: ↑1.17%)

5/17: <Sunday>
  • Cases: 1,526,842 (+21,809 | Δ Change: ↑2.40% | Σ Increase: ↑1.44%)
  • Deaths: 90,973 (+1,462 | Δ Change: ↑41.67% | Σ Increase: ↑1.45%)

5/18:
  • Cases: 1,550,294 (+23,452 | Δ Change: ↑7.53% | Σ Increase: ↑1.54%)
  • Deaths: 91,981 (+1,008 | Δ Change: ↓31.05% | Σ Increase: ↑1.11%)

5/19:
  • Cases: 1,570,583 (+20,289 | Δ Change: ↓13.49% | Σ Increase: ↑1.31%)
  • Deaths: 93,533 (+1,552 | Δ Change: ↑53.97% | Σ Increase: ↑1.69%)

5/20:
  • Cases: 1,591,991 (+21,408 | Δ Change: ↑5.52% | Σ Increase: ↑1.36%)
  • Deaths: 94,994 (+1,461 | Δ Change: ↓5.86% | Σ Increase: ↑1.56%)

5/21 (Yesterday):
  • Cases: 1,620,902 (+28,911 | Δ Change: ↑35.05% | Σ Increase: ↑1.82%)
  • Deaths: 96,354 (+1,360 | Δ Change: ↓6.91% | Σ Increase: ↑1.43%)

5/22 (Today):
  • Cases: 1,645,094 (+24,192 | Δ Change: ↓16.32% | Σ Increase: ↑1.49%)
  • Deaths: 97,647 (+1,293 | Δ Change: ↓4.93% | Σ Increase: ↑1.34%)
Logged
Donald Trump’s Toupée
GOP_Represent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,624


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2580 on: May 23, 2020, 08:30:17 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2581 on: May 23, 2020, 08:39:09 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I'm not that optimistic about the death rate. I think one of the big priorities now should be vaccines or the protective antibody treatments that may be rolled out much, much sooner.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2582 on: May 23, 2020, 09:17:08 AM »



Note the date.
Logged
Smeulders
Rookie
**
Posts: 108
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2583 on: May 23, 2020, 09:32:14 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I'm not that optimistic about the death rate. I think one of the big priorities now should be vaccines or the protective antibody treatments that may be rolled out much, much sooner.

The CDC has put out an estimate, without any information as to how they got to that number. The CDC's estimate diverges strongly from other studies, which do tell us how they got their estimates. There is no reason to believe the CDC numbers over the others until they show their methods. (Consensus IFR seems to be in the 0.5 - 1% range)
Logged
Inmate Trump
GWBFan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,094


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -7.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2584 on: May 23, 2020, 09:43:39 AM »

Can one of the conspiracy theorists here explain why they think the CDC is lying to us?
Logged
Smeulders
Rookie
**
Posts: 108
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2585 on: May 23, 2020, 10:09:03 AM »

First off, I do not necessarily think they are lying. It is not impossible that they have data to support their estimate. If so, they should produce it and people can try to figure out why estimates differ so much.

If they have no data to support the estimate, or if a reasonable analysis of their data does not support the estimate, it is not hard to guess what is happening. The CDC saying "it's not so bad" is helpful as the administration is pushing to reopen as quickly as possible.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,591


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2586 on: May 23, 2020, 10:36:10 AM »

Can one of the conspiracy theorists here explain why they think the CDC is lying to us?

I don't know that they are. But if you're asking why people might not trust the CDC 100% right now, the fact that it's run by someone who has no hesitation in sucking up to the coward Donald Trump probably has a lot to do with that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bq6lWdJAO4
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,516
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2587 on: May 23, 2020, 10:58:39 AM »

In Colorado, suicides in Mar-Apr 2020 is down from 2019, while calls to suicide hotlines are up.

Source (Denver Post)

Quote
Suicides in Colorado dropped 40% during first 2 months of coronavirus pandemic — but calls to crisis line spiked

[...]

Suicides have steadily increased in recent years, rising from 1,175 deaths in 2017 to 1,287 deaths in 2019, according to death certificate data from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.

But so far, suicides are down this year, most notably in March and April, when there were 139 such deaths, compared to the 233 deaths during the same months in 2019, according to the data.

As such, there is no sign yet that suicides are contributing to the 20% increase in overall deaths Colorado is experiencing either directly or indirectly because of the coronavirus pandemic.

[...]

While suicide rates are down, experts, caution that individuals are still experiencing mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety.

Colorado Crisis Services fielded 39,770 calls and text messages from people seeking help in March and April, up from the 26,928 calls and text messages during the same months last year.

[...]


There's also some prediction in here about this rate increasing in the next months but I don't think there's very much reason to think that will happen until October and into the winter, if at all.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,237


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2588 on: May 23, 2020, 11:09:40 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I thought at least 80% of cases were asymptomatic.  Why would they estimate such a larger % of symptomatic cases, while also estimating a much lower IFR than previous studies have concluded.  FWIW, that IFR estimate seems implausibly low based on the serology studies in NY and Spain.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,773


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2589 on: May 23, 2020, 11:13:05 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I guess my signature was actually too pessimistic!
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,516
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2590 on: May 23, 2020, 11:58:50 AM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I thought at least 80% of cases were asymptomatic.  Why would they estimate such a larger % of symptomatic cases, while also estimating a much lower IFR than previous studies have concluded.  FWIW, that IFR estimate seems implausibly low based on the serology studies in NY and Spain.

I haven't read the whole conservative review piece but the fact they cite the Ionnidis/Stanford antibody study makes me skeptical. That article has been thoroughly discredited on several fronts and should basically be considered garbage.
Logged
Smeulders
Rookie
**
Posts: 108
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2591 on: May 23, 2020, 12:04:27 PM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I thought at least 80% of cases were asymptomatic.  Why would they estimate such a larger % of symptomatic cases, while also estimating a much lower IFR than previous studies have concluded.  FWIW, that IFR estimate seems implausibly low based on the serology studies in NY and Spain.

A lot of the reports of very high asymptomatic rates are early in outbreaks, with more people developing symptoms later on, or in populations not representative of the general population (young navy personel for example). That part at least is plausible. Definitely agree that the CDC estimate is not easy to reconcile with the results of large scale serology studies.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,029


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2592 on: May 23, 2020, 12:29:23 PM »

Glad the virus-truthers want to listen to the CDC without question now!
Since we are doing that, how about we have everyone wear a mask, slowly reopen (and revert back to shutdowns if cases spike), and social distance, like the CDC recommends?
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,773


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2593 on: May 23, 2020, 12:43:09 PM »

Glad the virus-truthers want to listen to the CDC without question now!
Since we are doing that, how about we have everyone wear a mask, slowly reopen (and revert back to shutdowns if cases spike), and social distance, like the CDC recommends?

You know, I don't really have a huge problem with masks.  I'm happy to wear one if I'm going to be in a place like a supermarket (I actually remember kind of regretting not wearing one the last time I went in one).  I just think that most businesses should be open, even those not conducive to masks or social distancing (like restaurants).  As I live alone, I am also going to see friends when I can, as I would go crazy otherwise.

If masks in certain circumstances (like a crowded store) are what it takes to otherwise get back to normal, I'm fine with that.  It kind of feels dystopian when restaurant servers have masks on, but I don't mind that either at the end of the day.

What I do think we need (and even once this is over) is hand sanitizer everywhere.  You should never have a hard time finding it when you enter a store, workplace, church, stadium, or restaurant.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,237


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2594 on: May 23, 2020, 12:53:20 PM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I thought at least 80% of cases were asymptomatic.  Why would they estimate such a larger % of symptomatic cases, while also estimating a much lower IFR than previous studies have concluded.  FWIW, that IFR estimate seems implausibly low based on the serology studies in NY and Spain.

I haven't read the whole conservative review piece but the fact they cite the Ionnidis/Stanford antibody study makes me skeptical. That article has been thoroughly discredited on several fronts and should basically be considered garbage.

If you read the linked CDC report, it says their IFR estimates are just based on “data received by CDC prior to 4/29/2020”.  They estimate that 10% of the population (33 million people) have already been infected.  As much as I would like to believe we are that close to herd immunity, it just doesn’t seem possible to me.  The only states or countries that have estimated an infection rate close to that high through serology have a much higher death rate.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,923


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2595 on: May 23, 2020, 01:17:28 PM »


Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,516
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2596 on: May 23, 2020, 01:33:51 PM »

Facts.

“For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.”

“We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?”

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

I thought at least 80% of cases were asymptomatic.  Why would they estimate such a larger % of symptomatic cases, while also estimating a much lower IFR than previous studies have concluded.  FWIW, that IFR estimate seems implausibly low based on the serology studies in NY and Spain.

I haven't read the whole conservative review piece but the fact they cite the Ionnidis/Stanford antibody study makes me skeptical. That article has been thoroughly discredited on several fronts and should basically be considered garbage.

If you read the linked CDC report, it says their IFR estimates are just based on “data received by CDC prior to 4/29/2020”.  They estimate that 10% of the population (33 million people) have already been infected.  As much as I would like to believe we are that close to herd immunity, it just doesn’t seem possible to me.  The only states or countries that have estimated an infection rate close to that high through serology have a much higher death rate.

Yeah also worth mentioning that even if the CDC reports a most likely symptomatic CFR of 0.4%, they also give an estimate of uncertainty that says that it could be anywhere between 0.2% and 1%.

Their calculation going from symptomatic to total CFR also assumes that exhibiting symptoms doesn't depend on your age at all. Maybe this is true but I would find it surprising.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,591


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2597 on: May 23, 2020, 01:38:58 PM »

Logged
Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist
darthpi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,707
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2598 on: May 23, 2020, 02:29:29 PM »



"Is this about the virus or the election?" asks protester for whom it is pretty clearly about the election.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,127
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2599 on: May 23, 2020, 03:35:46 PM »



Logged
Pages: 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 ... 201  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.082 seconds with 8 queries.