2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread v2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 04:29:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread v2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 86
Author Topic: 2020 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread v2  (Read 167365 times)
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,027
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: December 27, 2019, 07:05:35 PM »

so is the current thinking that Republicans might win back some of the low hanging fruit like Horn, Brindisi, Van Drew, etc. but that Democrats are certain to win 2 districts in North Carolina + a couple in Texas, Georgia, etc., so 2020 will be a wash and Democrats will maintain a sizable majority in the House?

Something like that... I've also been seeing that its more likely than not Dems make a net gain in the house.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,989
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: December 28, 2019, 01:56:27 AM »

I think a Dem net pickup would require something more dramatic than just those seats.  Cartwright, Peterson, Brindisi, the open IA-02, etc. are going to flip unless the presidential election is a Dem blowout.

What? This is Iowa's most Democratic district.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,511


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: December 28, 2019, 11:00:37 AM »

I think a Dem net pickup would require something more dramatic than just those seats.  Cartwright, Peterson, Brindisi, the open IA-02, etc. are going to flip unless the presidential election is a Dem blowout.

What? This is Iowa's most Democratic district.
?
All 3 districts are equally D.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: December 28, 2019, 11:11:06 AM »

I think a Dem net pickup would require something more dramatic than just those seats.  Cartwright, Peterson, Brindisi, the open IA-02, etc. are going to flip unless the presidential election is a Dem blowout.

What? This is Iowa's most Democratic district.

If we're going strictly off of the 2016 presidential margin, then IA-02 is more Republican than IA-01 and IA-03 (although they're all within a point of each other). It also voted marginally to the right of IA-03 in last year's gubernatorial election and voted to the right of IA-01 in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections.

So no, it is not the "most Democratic district" by those metrics.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: December 28, 2019, 11:13:36 AM »

so is the current thinking that Republicans might win back some of the low hanging fruit like Horn, Brindisi, Van Drew, etc. but that Democrats are certain to win 2 districts in North Carolina + a couple in Texas, Georgia, etc., so 2020 will be a wash and Democrats will maintain a sizable majority in the House?

Consider this: RCP pegs the GCB at D+6.8 right now. There's a whole twelve Republican held districts that Trump either lost or won by less than 6.8:

NC-02 (redistricted)
NC-06 (redistricted)
NY-24
TX-23
PA-01
FL-25 (doesn't really fit the bill because of downballot Cubans sadly)
NE-02
NJ-02 (HARDLY a safe district for the GOP)
IL-13
TX-24
GA-07
OH-01

Meanwhile, there's only eight Democratic held districts that Trump won by more than 6.8:

MN-07 (🅱️eterson)
NY-22
OK-05
SC-01
ME-02
NM-02
NY-11
PA-08 (🅱️artwright)

Not to mention a few more districts that fall outside of those bounds on both sides but are still very winnable: TX-22, PA-10, NY-02, TX-31, TX-10, TX-21, and the weird three way race in MI-03 for the Dems, UT-04, NY-19, NJ-03, IA-01, IL-14, IA-03, IA-02, MI-08, VA-02, and VA-07 for the GOP, etc.

Dems left a lot on the table in 2018, and to act like they don't have room to grow in 2020 would be foolish. In fact, here's your hot take of the day: Dems are going to net seats. You heard it here first, folks.


I do think it's plausible that the Dems actually do pick up seats, mostly because their freshman class seems strong and because they have more guaranteed pickups than Republicans do (the two NC districts and TX-23 seem like definite pickups at this point).

I think a Dem net pickup would require something more dramatic than just those seats.  Cartwright, Peterson, Brindisi, the open IA-02, etc. are going to flip unless the presidential election is a Dem blowout.  A Dem net gain would require something like every Republican-held seat involved in the Austin gerrymander flipping. 

Cartwright?  Biden probably carries that district if he is the nominee.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,895


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: December 31, 2019, 02:34:20 PM »

GA-07: Former Sen. Max Cleland changes his endorsement from Bourdeaux to Karinshak.
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,358
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: January 01, 2020, 04:34:46 AM »

so is the current thinking that Republicans might win back some of the low hanging fruit like Horn, Brindisi, Van Drew, etc. but that Democrats are certain to win 2 districts in North Carolina + a couple in Texas, Georgia, etc., so 2020 will be a wash and Democrats will maintain a sizable majority in the House?

Consider this: RCP pegs the GCB at D+6.8 right now. There's a whole twelve Republican held districts that Trump either lost or won by less than 6.8:

NC-02 (redistricted)
NC-06 (redistricted)
NY-24
TX-23
PA-01
FL-25 (doesn't really fit the bill because of downballot Cubans sadly)
NE-02
NJ-02 (HARDLY a safe district for the GOP)
IL-13
TX-24
GA-07
OH-01

Meanwhile, there's only eight Democratic held districts that Trump won by more than 6.8:

MN-07 (🅱️eterson)
NY-22
OK-05
SC-01
ME-02
NM-02
NY-11
PA-08 (🅱️artwright)

Not to mention a few more districts that fall outside of those bounds on both sides but are still very winnable: TX-22, PA-10, NY-02, TX-31, TX-10, TX-21, and the weird three way race in MI-03 for the Dems, UT-04, NY-19, NJ-03, IA-01, IL-14, IA-03, IA-02, MI-08, VA-02, and VA-07 for the GOP, etc.

Dems left a lot on the table in 2018, and to act like they don't have room to grow in 2020 would be foolish. In fact, here's your hot take of the day: Dems are going to net seats. You heard it here first, folks.


I do think it's plausible that the Dems actually do pick up seats, mostly because their freshman class seems strong and because they have more guaranteed pickups than Republicans do (the two NC districts and TX-23 seem like definite pickups at this point).

I think a Dem net pickup would require something more dramatic than just those seats.  Cartwright, Peterson, Brindisi, the open IA-02, etc. are going to flip unless the presidential election is a Dem blowout.  A Dem net gain would require something like every Republican-held seat involved in the Austin gerrymander flipping.  

Cartwright?  Biden probably carries that district if he is the nominee.

Atlas: Biden can flip a Trump +10 district blue if he runs, because of muh Pennsylvania roots and muh blue collar identity

Also Atlas: You're CRAZY if you think a Clinton +1, Romney +21 district could flip R if a literal Socialist is nominated
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,014


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: January 01, 2020, 08:56:50 AM »
« Edited: January 01, 2020, 09:21:22 AM by Brittain33 »

Atlas: Biden can flip a Trump +10 district blue if he runs, because of muh Pennsylvania roots and muh blue collar identity

Also Atlas: You're CRAZY if you think a Clinton +1, Romney +21 district could flip R if a literal Socialist is nominated

Atlas: an incumbent winning reelection while the opposing Presidential candidate wins it is "flipping" a district
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,358
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: January 01, 2020, 02:08:09 PM »

Atlas: Biden can flip a Trump +10 district blue if he runs, because of muh Pennsylvania roots and muh blue collar identity

Also Atlas: You're CRAZY if you think a Clinton +1, Romney +21 district could flip R if a literal Socialist is nominated

Atlas: an incumbent winning reelection while the opposing Presidential candidate wins it is "flipping" a district

We're talking about Presidential politics here, so yes, sure.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: January 01, 2020, 02:11:21 PM »

Atlas: Biden can flip a Trump +10 district blue if he runs, because of muh Pennsylvania roots and muh blue collar identity

Also Atlas: You're CRAZY if you think a Clinton +1, Romney +21 district could flip R if a literal Socialist is nominated

Atlas: an incumbent winning reelection while the opposing Presidential candidate wins it is "flipping" a district

We're talking about Presidential politics here, so yes, sure.

There are plenty of people here who think Biden will lose PA-08. Not to mention, PA-08 and TX-07 are entirely different districts with entirely different demographic profiles so it's pretty stupid to make that comparison.
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,358
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: January 01, 2020, 03:18:50 PM »

Atlas: Biden can flip a Trump +10 district blue if he runs, because of muh Pennsylvania roots and muh blue collar identity

Also Atlas: You're CRAZY if you think a Clinton +1, Romney +21 district could flip R if a literal Socialist is nominated

Atlas: an incumbent winning reelection while the opposing Presidential candidate wins it is "flipping" a district

We're talking about Presidential politics here, so yes, sure.

There are plenty of people here who think Biden will lose PA-08. Not to mention, PA-08 and TX-07 are entirely different districts with entirely different demographic profiles so it's pretty stupid to make that comparison.

Why is it so stupid?
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: January 03, 2020, 05:14:46 PM »



NY-19 : Molinaro won't run, a big recruitment failure to say the least
Logged
Lisa's voting Biden
LCameronAL
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.75, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: January 03, 2020, 05:16:00 PM »



NY-19 : Molinaro won't run, a big recruitment failure to say the least
Who would want to be in the House minority during the age of Trump? Molinaro is smart.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: January 03, 2020, 05:20:06 PM »



NY-19 : Molinaro won't run, a big recruitment failure to say the least

Huge blow to the GOP here. Although NY-19 should be one of their high priority seats, many Republicans were hoping that Molinaro would jump in and become a formidable challenger to Rep. Delgado.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,027
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: January 03, 2020, 05:23:02 PM »

A bit late, but YouGov has the Generic Ballot at D+10.

Pelosi approval is only -4

Dem congressional approval is -5

GOP congressional approval is -20

Safe to say impeachment hasn't put a dent in Democrats' chances of holding the house. At least according to YouGov.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/2r6hyqtv9p/econTabReport.pdf
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,502


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: January 06, 2020, 07:08:06 AM »

Haley Stevens (MI-11) raised $550K in the 4th Q

Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,502


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: January 06, 2020, 08:44:06 AM »

Impeachment vote certainly helped! WOW:

Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: January 06, 2020, 09:59:27 AM »

Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: January 06, 2020, 10:26:28 AM »

A few other fundraising figures:

Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: January 06, 2020, 12:47:42 PM »



Some datas from a conservative PAC.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,989
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: January 06, 2020, 12:51:15 PM »

A few other fundraising figures:



So many marks, so little time.
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: January 06, 2020, 02:51:24 PM »

Impeachment vote certainly helped! WOW:



That might be more than Michael Bennet raised for President lol
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: January 06, 2020, 04:44:28 PM »

Here is a roundup of fundraising numbers from today, courtesy of DailyKos:

Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: January 06, 2020, 09:08:49 PM »

UT-04: Ben McAdams raised around $900K in Q4

https://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/22584-campaign-sources-mcadams-raised-nearly-1-million-in-campaign-cash-has-nearly-2-million-in-the-bank
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: January 07, 2020, 05:20:45 AM »


Yeah, I doubt that republicans will take back this district next year especially with Trump lukewarm approval rate in Utah
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 86  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 10 queries.