California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 01:44:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64
Author Topic: California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)  (Read 70119 times)
EastwoodS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,889


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1525 on: March 07, 2024, 08:34:05 PM »

I had a huge problem with Schiff boosting Garvey because had a Republican been locked out of the top two it could have possible lowered GOP turnout down ballot and made it easier to win House seats. Some things are more important than having an easy time winning your own race. Schiff would have still be favored against another Democrat.
What’s more important than making sure that republicans In your state have a voice for senator. I thought yall were about Democracy?
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1526 on: March 07, 2024, 08:50:44 PM »

I had a huge problem with Schiff boosting Garvey because had a Republican been locked out of the top two it could have possible lowered GOP turnout down ballot and made it easier to win House seats. Some things are more important than having an easy time winning your own race. Schiff would have still be favored against another Democrat.
What’s more important than making sure that republicans In your state have a voice for senator. I thought yall were about Democracy?

The above is a really stupid comment.  The senatorial election had multiple Republicans on the ballot.  Republican voters had ample opportunity to vote for their preferred candidate.  If Schiff had not run ads for Garvey, there would have been nothing "anti-democratic" about him not doing so.

Now, one can argue that the top-2 system is itself somewhat anti-democratic because of the possibility of a lockout, and I think there's something to that argument.  It's something that potentially can (and in fact has) hurt both parties.  If a jurisdiction is going to use this kind of primary system, then the top-4 system that Alaska uses is better because it pretty much ensures that both parties will have at least one candidate advance to the general election.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,230
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1527 on: March 07, 2024, 08:53:54 PM »

Schiff is gonna win by 5/7 pts and Biden is gonna win CA 55/45
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,391
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1528 on: March 07, 2024, 10:42:56 PM »

I had a huge problem with Schiff boosting Garvey because had a Republican been locked out of the top two it could have possible lowered GOP turnout down ballot and made it easier to win House seats. Some things are more important than having an easy time winning your own race. Schiff would have still be favored against another Democrat.
What’s more important than making sure that republicans In your state have a voice for senator. I thought yall were about Democracy?

Republicans had plenty of choices on the ballot. It's not undemocratic if their choice doesn't make the top two, it's just what happens sometimes. My concern is electing those who will protect democracy, not Republicans being guaranteed a spot in the top two (which legally they aren't even entitled to).
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,051


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1529 on: March 08, 2024, 09:38:28 AM »

We're about half way counted in CA and the makeup of the Senate race is

D 57.3%
R 41.0%
Other 1.7%

From what I remember, I think it will oscillate a bit between a blue mirage and red mirage at this point after the in-persons were redder, but I feel like the last few cycles have been a bit confusing and all over the place in their trajectory compared to long ago, so who knows.

Just an awful performance by Porter and Lee though.

~53% in now, I think yesterday morning it was at like 47 or 48%. Slight inch up for Ds:

57.5% D
40.8% R
1.7% Other

~58% in now; so far a mini-blue shift. We've gone from D+16.3 to D+17.5 so far

D 57.9%
R 40.4%
Other 1.7%
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,053
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1530 on: March 08, 2024, 10:01:59 AM »

Question is whether Garvey can exceed Dahle's performance in 2022, he lost by 18.4%. Something like a 59-41 outcome would be a good showing by Garvey.

Yup, though that would require Garvey to run ahead of Trump by a few points. I think that will be the case, just not sure whether it's more than 1-2 pts.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,230
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1531 on: March 08, 2024, 10:23:57 AM »

It's not gonna be that close Schiff is gonna win 5/7 pts Garvey only did well on a split vote
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,358
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1532 on: March 08, 2024, 11:10:58 AM »

Question is whether Garvey can exceed Dahle's performance in 2022, he lost by 18.4%. Something like a 59-41 outcome would be a good showing by Garvey.

Yup, though that would require Garvey to run ahead of Trump by a few points. I think that will be the case, just not sure whether it's more than 1-2 pts.

That is dependent on how well Trump does in the first place.
Logged
Arizona Iced Tea
Minute Maid Juice
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,004


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1533 on: March 08, 2024, 03:22:57 PM »

Will Garvey beat Schiff in Orange County in November?
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,398
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1534 on: March 08, 2024, 04:32:41 PM »

Will Garvey beat Schiff in Orange County in November?

I could see it, honestly, though Biden will win Orange County.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1535 on: March 08, 2024, 11:01:24 PM »

We're about half way counted in CA and the makeup of the Senate race is

D 57.3%
R 41.0%
Other 1.7%

From what I remember, I think it will oscillate a bit between a blue mirage and red mirage at this point after the in-persons were redder, but I feel like the last few cycles have been a bit confusing and all over the place in their trajectory compared to long ago, so who knows.

Just an awful performance by Porter and Lee though.

~53% in now, I think yesterday morning it was at like 47 or 48%. Slight inch up for Ds:

57.5% D
40.8% R
1.7% Other

~58% in now; so far a mini-blue shift. We've gone from D+16.3 to D+17.5 so far

D 57.9%
R 40.4%
Other 1.7%

It'll go from 16.3 to 21 or so back to 19, if it follows the same pattern as last year.

Counties completely in so far are Kings and El Dorado, according to NYT. Kings is Valadao's home turf.

Kings:

2020 Pres: Trump +12.3
2022 Gov: Dahle +30.2
2024 Sen: GOP +32.7
2022 House Primary (CD 13): GOP +26
2022 House General (CD13): Valadao +12
2024 House Primary (CD13): GOP +24

El Dorado:

2020 Pres: Trump +8.8
2022 Gov: Dahle +22.1
2024 Sen: GOP +16.4

From this, ballpark is D +19/20 in the end. Valadao might be a little weaker, given the primary margin slippage. El Dorado doesn't look that great for the GOP either.
Logged
Agafin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 974
Cameroon


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1536 on: March 09, 2024, 06:44:05 AM »

We're about half way counted in CA and the makeup of the Senate race is

D 57.3%
R 41.0%
Other 1.7%

From what I remember, I think it will oscillate a bit between a blue mirage and red mirage at this point after the in-persons were redder, but I feel like the last few cycles have been a bit confusing and all over the place in their trajectory compared to long ago, so who knows.

Just an awful performance by Porter and Lee though.

~53% in now, I think yesterday morning it was at like 47 or 48%. Slight inch up for Ds:

57.5% D
40.8% R
1.7% Other

~58% in now; so far a mini-blue shift. We've gone from D+16.3 to D+17.5 so far

D 57.9%
R 40.4%
Other 1.7%

It'll go from 16.3 to 21 or so back to 19, if it follows the same pattern as last year.

Counties completely in so far are Kings and El Dorado, according to NYT. Kings is Valadao's home turf.

Kings:

2020 Pres: Trump +12.3
2022 Gov: Dahle +30.2
2024 Sen: GOP +32.7
2022 House Primary (CD 13): GOP +26
2022 House General (CD13): Valadao +12
2024 House Primary (CD13): GOP +24

El Dorado:

2020 Pres: Trump +8.8
2022 Gov: Dahle +22.1
2024 Sen: GOP +16.4

From this, ballpark is D +19/20 in the end. Valadao might be a little weaker, given the primary margin slippage. El Dorado doesn't look that great for the GOP either.

Hmm so Dahle actually had a pretty great performance.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,051


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1537 on: March 09, 2024, 12:01:08 PM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)

We'll see where it goes from here; I don't think it's as foreseen that it goes back down for Ds, but we'll see. It seems like the turnout may have been a bit underestimated; LA County for example has kept revising its total for a couple days now as more come in
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,230
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1538 on: March 09, 2024, 12:08:18 PM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)

We'll see where it goes from here; I don't think it's as foreseen that it goes back down for Ds, but we'll see. It seems like the turnout may have been a bit underestimated; LA County for example has kept revising its total for a couple days now as more come in

Schiff will win 52/45 by 5/7 points over all
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,504
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1539 on: March 09, 2024, 12:09:16 PM »

Didn't expect Santa Cruz to flip in the Special at all.
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,190


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1540 on: March 09, 2024, 02:17:18 PM »

Didn't expect Santa Cruz to flip in the Special at all.

Something is pretty obviously wrong with Schiff's total in the special in Santa Cruz. He is getting 44% for the full term and only 22% in the special. There are also 13,000 less votes in the special than for the full term. And just to be clear the results page shows Porter leading the special not Garvey.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1541 on: March 09, 2024, 03:08:38 PM »

We're about half way counted in CA and the makeup of the Senate race is

D 57.3%
R 41.0%
Other 1.7%

From what I remember, I think it will oscillate a bit between a blue mirage and red mirage at this point after the in-persons were redder, but I feel like the last few cycles have been a bit confusing and all over the place in their trajectory compared to long ago, so who knows.

Just an awful performance by Porter and Lee though.

~53% in now, I think yesterday morning it was at like 47 or 48%. Slight inch up for Ds:

57.5% D
40.8% R
1.7% Other

~58% in now; so far a mini-blue shift. We've gone from D+16.3 to D+17.5 so far

D 57.9%
R 40.4%
Other 1.7%

It'll go from 16.3 to 21 or so back to 19, if it follows the same pattern as last year.

Counties completely in so far are Kings and El Dorado, according to NYT. Kings is Valadao's home turf.

Kings:

2020 Pres: Trump +12.3
2022 Gov: Dahle +30.2
2024 Sen: GOP +32.7
2022 House Primary (CD 13): GOP +26
2022 House General (CD13): Valadao +12
2024 House Primary (CD13): GOP +24

El Dorado:

2020 Pres: Trump +8.8
2022 Gov: Dahle +22.1
2024 Sen: GOP +16.4

From this, ballpark is D +19/20 in the end. Valadao might be a little weaker, given the primary margin slippage. El Dorado doesn't look that great for the GOP either.

Hmm so Dahle actually had a pretty great performance.

Newsom just has middling popularity. I don't know Dahle's reputation, but he seems pretty generic and is from a from a forgotten part of the state, so I doubt he was why it was only D+18 statewide.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,504
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1542 on: March 09, 2024, 09:00:50 PM »

Didn't expect Santa Cruz to flip in the Special at all.

Something is pretty obviously wrong with Schiff's total in the special in Santa Cruz. He is getting 44% for the full term and only 22% in the special. There are also 13,000 less votes in the special than for the full term. And just to be clear the results page shows Porter leading the special not Garvey.

Ah, that makes more sense.
Logged
Pouring Rain and Blairing Music
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,829
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1543 on: March 10, 2024, 02:15:28 AM »

We're about half way counted in CA and the makeup of the Senate race is

D 57.3%
R 41.0%
Other 1.7%

From what I remember, I think it will oscillate a bit between a blue mirage and red mirage at this point after the in-persons were redder, but I feel like the last few cycles have been a bit confusing and all over the place in their trajectory compared to long ago, so who knows.

Just an awful performance by Porter and Lee though.

~53% in now, I think yesterday morning it was at like 47 or 48%. Slight inch up for Ds:

57.5% D
40.8% R
1.7% Other

~58% in now; so far a mini-blue shift. We've gone from D+16.3 to D+17.5 so far

D 57.9%
R 40.4%
Other 1.7%

It'll go from 16.3 to 21 or so back to 19, if it follows the same pattern as last year.

Counties completely in so far are Kings and El Dorado, according to NYT. Kings is Valadao's home turf.

Kings:

2020 Pres: Trump +12.3
2022 Gov: Dahle +30.2
2024 Sen: GOP +32.7
2022 House Primary (CD 13): GOP +26
2022 House General (CD13): Valadao +12
2024 House Primary (CD13): GOP +24

El Dorado:

2020 Pres: Trump +8.8
2022 Gov: Dahle +22.1
2024 Sen: GOP +16.4

From this, ballpark is D +19/20 in the end. Valadao might be a little weaker, given the primary margin slippage. El Dorado doesn't look that great for the GOP either.

Hmm so Dahle actually had a pretty great performance.

Newsom just has middling popularity. I don't know Dahle's reputation, but he seems pretty generic and is from a from a forgotten part of the state, so I doubt he was why it was only D+18 statewide.
Dahle is the state senator for the district (SD-1) with El Dorado County, though Dahle is from 150 miles to the north (big district). As a side note, Dahle beat Kevin Kiley (effectively the more local candidate) in the 2019 special election for the seat. That state senate district covers most of the northeastern part of the state, basically part of what people were trying to make into the state of Jefferson. So, there could be a bit of a bonus, but hard for me to say how much.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,051


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1544 on: March 10, 2024, 09:04:45 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)

For comparison, final D share was 58.1% in 2022-GOV.
Logged
Annatar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 983
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1545 on: March 10, 2024, 05:51:03 PM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)

For comparison, final D share was 58.1% in 2022-GOV.

And the final R share was 34% in the primary, so it was a 58.1 - 34 result, +24.1D in the CA 2022 Governor primary.

Logged
Agafin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 974
Cameroon


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1546 on: March 11, 2024, 02:04:28 AM »

So what's up with Santa Clara county? Why would Schiff's vote share be 60% lower in the Special compared to the Full term? That seems like a pretty drastic difference.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1547 on: March 11, 2024, 06:43:42 AM »

So what's up with Santa Clara county? Why would Schiff's vote share be 60% lower in the Special compared to the Full term? That seems like a pretty drastic difference.

Probably a tabulation error.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,051


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1548 on: March 11, 2024, 08:43:48 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)

For comparison, final D share was 58.1% in 2022-GOV.

And the final R share was 34% in the primary, so it was a 58.1 - 34 result, +24.1D in the CA 2022 Governor primary.



Eh, not doing a direct D-R comparison for that one since a few Independent candidates were much more prominent in some of those races than this year.
Logged
Agafin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 974
Cameroon


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1549 on: March 11, 2024, 09:13:33 AM »

So what's up with Santa Clara county? Why would Schiff's vote share be 60% lower in the Special compared to the Full term? That seems like a pretty drastic difference.

Probably a tabulation error.
A pretty blatant tabulation error going on for days without being corrected would be quite embarassing.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.