AZ-SEN 2022 Megathread: Mastering the Art of the Thiel
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 07:19:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AZ-SEN 2022 Megathread: Mastering the Art of the Thiel
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33
Author Topic: AZ-SEN 2022 Megathread: Mastering the Art of the Thiel  (Read 46441 times)
AncestralDemocrat.
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,489
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #750 on: October 22, 2022, 01:31:06 PM »

Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,209


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #751 on: October 22, 2022, 01:48:36 PM »


Getting nervous now
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #752 on: October 22, 2022, 01:53:02 PM »



I think this has always been true throughout the cycle. If Dems are tie or losing the NPV, AZ is def not a shoe-in lol.

My main fear as I've said before is low Hispanic turnout really costing Dems.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,990
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #753 on: October 22, 2022, 01:54:39 PM »

Not saying for certain this race isn't close, it's decently close at the very least, but it should be noted that public statements like this are important to remind people to get out to vote, by holding out the specter of a Masters win. Even if the race was actually strongly in Kelly's favor (say, private internals for both campaigns having it around Kelly+8), they would have reason to say this.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #754 on: October 22, 2022, 01:55:11 PM »

Not a perfect comparison by any means (they usually never are), but this could be this cycle's NC-SEN 2014 in that a somewhat flawed R challenger who trailed in most pre-election polls is carried across the finish line by a late-breaking wave, the state's (relative) R lean, and a shift in messaging away from the challenger's peculiar positions/past to the incumbent's voting record/ties to the incumbent D president.

Feeling pretty good about my prediction of AZ flipping before GA.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,087
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #755 on: October 22, 2022, 01:55:28 PM »

I'm not surprised. Based on the GCB and Arizona's partisanship, there's no way Kelly was ever winning by 5+ points. He'll be lucky to win at all.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,990
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #756 on: October 22, 2022, 01:58:12 PM »

I'm not surprised. Based on the GCB and Arizona's partisanship, there's no way Kelly was ever winning by 5+ points. He'll be lucky to win at all.
The claim Kelly would win by huge margins was always something that should have aroused skepticism. Fundamentals matter and the leans of states have a significant impact on how things are once all votes are counted. It wasn't always like this, but it's like this now.
Logged
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,391


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #757 on: October 22, 2022, 01:59:43 PM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,597
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #758 on: October 22, 2022, 02:16:31 PM »

I mean, who honestly thought Mark Kelly was going to win by 6 when he won by 2 in 2020? Boggles the mind.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,087
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #759 on: October 22, 2022, 02:28:45 PM »

I mean, who honestly thought Mark Kelly was going to win by 6 when he won by 2 in 2020? Boggles the mind.

I suppose some people thought Arizona was moving leftward more quickly than expected. But since you're in Arizona, how do things look on the ground there?
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,597
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #760 on: October 22, 2022, 02:30:59 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2022, 02:36:57 PM by xavier110 »

I mean, who honestly thought Mark Kelly was going to win by 6 when he won by 2 in 2020? Boggles the mind.

I suppose some people thought Arizona was moving leftward more quickly than expected. But since you're in Arizona, how do things look on the ground there?

I think it’s going to be very close for both Senator and Governor
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,107
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #761 on: October 22, 2022, 02:37:05 PM »

Of course it's gonna be close Gas prices along with rents has increased remember gas prices were cheap and Center street Pac had it 55/36 Kelly and 50/45 Hobbs yeah I remember those polls in August when gas prices were declining

That's why Ds blocked the WVA pipeline gaa prices were declining now it's increasing and the most people live in AZ and CA anyhow
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,364
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #762 on: October 22, 2022, 03:04:02 PM »


How would it benefit the Kelly campaign to say that they have the election in the bag? All that would accomplish is breeding complacency among his own supporters.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,755


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #763 on: October 22, 2022, 03:55:37 PM »

Makes sense now that Republicans triaged Bolduc in New Hampshire to help Masters in Arizona.

AZ is a much more polarized & closer State so it was the right call.
Logged
Born to Slay. Forced to Work.
leecannon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,149
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #764 on: October 22, 2022, 04:31:21 PM »


Getting nervous now

Eh, it’s just pre-election jitters. I’m confident Kelly will win, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if it was a very close race. Very campaign gets cold feet right before an election. Voters start deciding, gaps close, and people get nervous
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,974


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #765 on: October 22, 2022, 05:40:18 PM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.

I would generally agree with this, but it also seems like Biden was burned by Ohio. It genuinely seemed they thought they had a chance.

Though yeah, the point stands. Biden's overall campaign did like a whole powerpoint thing in like September of 2020 showing all their data from the swing states to try and prove that the public polling was showing a much less tight race.
Logged
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,391


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #766 on: October 22, 2022, 05:41:59 PM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.

I would generally agree with this, but it also seems like Biden was burned by Ohio. It genuinely seemed they thought they had a chance.

Though yeah, the point stands. Biden's overall campaign did like a whole powerpoint thing in like September of 2020 showing all their data from the swing states to try and prove that the public polling was showing a much less tight race.

Both Biden and Trump's people seemed to know Michigan was competitive up until the end.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,974


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #767 on: October 22, 2022, 05:52:33 PM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.

I would generally agree with this, but it also seems like Biden was burned by Ohio. It genuinely seemed they thought they had a chance.

Though yeah, the point stands. Biden's overall campaign did like a whole powerpoint thing in like September of 2020 showing all their data from the swing states to try and prove that the public polling was showing a much less tight race.

Both Biden and Trump's people seemed to know Michigan was competitive up until the end.

I thought there were rumblings towards the end that Michigan was likely the least chance of a Trump win of the "blue wall"? Maybe I'm remembering wrong. I feel like there was hullaballoo about his team dropping out ads in Michigan or something in the final days to focus on other states.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,294
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #768 on: October 22, 2022, 06:09:50 PM »

Not a perfect comparison by any means (they usually never are), but this could be this cycle's NC-SEN 2014 in that a somewhat flawed R challenger who trailed in most pre-election polls is carried across the finish line by a late-breaking wave, the state's (relative) R lean, and a shift in messaging away from the challenger's peculiar positions/past to the incumbent's voting record/ties to the incumbent D president.

Feeling pretty good about my prediction of AZ flipping before GA.

Honestly this. And PA-SEN feels like it’s this year’s NC-SEN 2020.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,336
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #769 on: October 22, 2022, 11:46:08 PM »

I have PA as my VA-SEN 2014. PA is my NC-SEN and NC is my LA-SEN (Dem widely seen as toast but still makes it close)
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #770 on: October 23, 2022, 09:48:13 AM »

Lol all y’all comparing current senate races to previous senate races are a bit silly. Every senate race has its own very unique circumstances and there’s never 2 that are truly parallel, maybe some mild similarities at best.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #771 on: October 23, 2022, 09:51:40 AM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.

I would generally agree with this, but it also seems like Biden was burned by Ohio. It genuinely seemed they thought they had a chance.

Though yeah, the point stands. Biden's overall campaign did like a whole powerpoint thing in like September of 2020 showing all their data from the swing states to try and prove that the public polling was showing a much less tight race.

Both Biden and Trump's people seemed to know Michigan was competitive up until the end.

I thought there were rumblings towards the end that Michigan was likely the least chance of a Trump win of the "blue wall"? Maybe I'm remembering wrong. I feel like there was hullaballoo about his team dropping out ads in Michigan or something in the final days to focus on other states.

The sense I got is this is what they believed the battleground was by E-Day:

Colorado/New Mexico/Virginia - String likely D
Maine, New Hampshire - Weaker Likely D
Minnesota, Nevada, Michigan - Lean D
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona - Tossup
Georgia, North Carolina - Tilt R
Florida, Texas, Ohio, Iowa - Lean R
Alaska? - Likely R
Logged
Penn_Quaker_Girl
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,441
India


Political Matrix
E: 0.10, S: 0.06

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #772 on: October 23, 2022, 09:54:10 AM »



Stuff like this kind of confirms my suspicion that internal polls (real internals, not ones that get deliberately leaked by the campaign) are actually quite accurate and it's the public polls that are a total joke. Similar stories kind of got lost in the shuffle of the post-2020 media, but there was info coming out back then that, for example, the Biden campaign always knew Wisconsin was a pure tossup, and that the Senate Dems were confident by election day that Gideon and Cunningham would lose, even though the public polls were not indicating that.

I would generally agree with this, but it also seems like Biden was burned by Ohio. It genuinely seemed they thought they had a chance.

Though yeah, the point stands. Biden's overall campaign did like a whole powerpoint thing in like September of 2020 showing all their data from the swing states to try and prove that the public polling was showing a much less tight race.

Both Biden and Trump's people seemed to know Michigan was competitive up until the end.

I thought there were rumblings towards the end that Michigan was likely the least chance of a Trump win of the "blue wall"? Maybe I'm remembering wrong. I feel like there was hullaballoo about his team dropping out ads in Michigan or something in the final days to focus on other states.

Ah I remember that.  I also seem to recall some quiet concerns about the scant number of campaign visits that Clinton had made to the Rust Belt Three (MI, PA, and WI) during the final weeks of the campaign, though these concerns were largely "we've noticed, but it shouldn't be a problem". 
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,671
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #773 on: October 23, 2022, 10:09:26 AM »

Lol all y’all comparing current senate races to previous senate races are a bit silly. Every senate race has its own very unique circumstances and there’s never 2 that are truly parallel, maybe some mild similarities at best.

History rhymes, right?
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #774 on: October 23, 2022, 10:11:11 AM »

Lol all y’all comparing current senate races to previous senate races are a bit silly. Every senate race has its own very unique circumstances and there’s never 2 that are truly parallel, maybe some mild similarities at best.

History rhymes, right?

Ig to some degree, it often seems like in hindsight the comparisons people make are just really bad.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 8 queries.