Seats considered "safe" in 2022 that could be competitive in 2024?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:06:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Seats considered "safe" in 2022 that could be competitive in 2024?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Seats considered "safe" in 2022 that could be competitive in 2024?  (Read 1405 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,361


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2022, 01:35:27 PM »


You don't think trends will continue in CO-03?

CO-03 has terrible undercurrents for Democrats - a largely ancestral Democratic base in the Southern parts of the district, and a large set of low-propensity conservatives in other areas. The ski-resort types are high-turnout voters who won't be able to increase their vote share in a presidential year. But it's a complex district, and Boebert is a uniquely terrible candidate so this will probably be closer than Republicans would like, but I still think it favors them in the long-run.

Yeah but nc 11 is literally an identical district to Colorado 3 .
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,516


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2022, 01:36:14 PM »


You don't think trends will continue in CO-03?

CO-03 has terrible undercurrents for Democrats - a largely ancestral Democratic base in the Southern parts of the district, and a large set of low-propensity conservatives in other areas. The ski-resort types are high-turnout voters who won't be able to increase their vote share in a presidential year. But it's a complex district, and Boebert is a uniquely terrible candidate so this will probably be closer than Republicans would like, but I still think it favors them in the long-run.

the people moving in and out of CO-03.. it does favor Democrats.

If a non-Boebert is a the GOP nominee.. do think the GOP holds it for sure though.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2022, 03:30:20 PM »


You don't think trends will continue in CO-03?

CO-03 has terrible undercurrents for Democrats - a largely ancestral Democratic base in the Southern parts of the district, and a large set of low-propensity conservatives in other areas. The ski-resort types are high-turnout voters who won't be able to increase their vote share in a presidential year. But it's a complex district, and Boebert is a uniquely terrible candidate so this will probably be closer than Republicans would like, but I still think it favors them in the long-run.

the people moving in and out of CO-03.. it does favor Democrats.

If a non-Boebert is a the GOP nominee.. do think the GOP holds it for sure though.

I didn't know this! Where are the growth and loss areas in CO-03?
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,163
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 21, 2022, 02:08:10 AM »

You don't think trends will continue in CO-03?

CO-03 has terrible undercurrents for Democrats - a largely ancestral Democratic base in the Southern parts of the district, and a large set of low-propensity conservatives in other areas. The ski-resort types are high-turnout voters who won't be able to increase their vote share in a presidential year. But it's a complex district, and Boebert is a uniquely terrible candidate so this will probably be closer than Republicans would like, but I still think it favors them in the long-run.

Yeah but nc 11 is literally an identical district to Colorado 3 .

No it isn't. They have a few superficial commonalities but outside of Asheville the types of outdoorsy-as-lifestyle people moving to NC11 are very different than moving to CO3.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,340
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 21, 2022, 08:07:40 AM »
« Edited: November 21, 2022, 08:11:04 AM by The Address That Must Not be Named »

I’m sure there are others, but here are some that immediately come to mind (including races considered Safe Flips in 2022):

Democratic-held:
- NC-6: Kathy Manning (redistricting)
- NC-14: Jeff Jackson (redistricting)
- FL-9: Darren Soto (if Republicans can recruit a strong candidate)
- WA-3: Marie Perez (I think most considered this Likely/Safe R in 2022 Tongue )

Republican-Held:
- PA-10: Scott Perry
- CA-3 (if Dems run a good candidate, especially if the scandal rumors I’ve heard about Kiley are true)
- MI-10: John James
- PA-1: Brian Fitzpatrick
- FL-13: Anna Paulina Luna (if Dems recruit a strong candidate; I get major MTG/Boebart vibes from Luna and suspect she will be a chronic under-performer)
- TX-15: Monica De La Cruz (if we actually try here this time)
- IA-1: Marinette Miller-Meeks (two consecutive under-performances)
- IA-2: Ashley Hinson (under-performed in a good year for Iowa Republicans)
- WI-3: Derrick Van Orden (if Dems recruit a good candidate)
- AZ-6: Juan Ciscomani


I think we missed our shot at CO-3 and NC-11 is like VA-5 (with Ashville being like Charlottesville): it is basically fool’s gold.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,361


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2022, 12:34:21 PM »

Agreed on Luna. A lot of junk polls showed the race tied but they also had Rubio tied in the seat   in the end DeSantis and Rubio probably won the seat by 15 while Luna barely outperformed Trump.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 12 queries.