Recent Posts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:33:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Filter Options Collapse
        


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 07:26:34 PM 
Started by Arizona Iced Tea - Last post by ProgressiveModerate
I think the angriest will just stay home, vote third party or leave the presidential ballot blank. Ultimately, though, most will still vote Biden because they know Trump will be worse for Gaza and Muslim Americans.

I think the discontent runs deeper than you give it credit for. There’s still time for things to change, though.

I think there are many groups using Israeli/Gaza as a reason to express deeper anger towards Biden.

1. I made a thread about this a while back but many Arab Americans were already going to flip to Trump or at least not vote for Biden pre-10/7 due to some of their more socially conservative religious views. This can be shown in the 2022 midterm results where places like Dearborn and Hamtramack in MI were the only parts of the state to swing hard right from 2020 Pres --> 2022 Gov and this was pre 10/7.

2. Many progressives who were never going to vote for Biden - many of whom perhaps didn't vote for him in 2020 or Clinton in 2016. These types are angry and want to burn the system down which they don't see Biden as the right person for. There are so many cases I've seen online where a progressive twitter or Instagram account says "I'm so fed up and won't be voting for Biden" - then people go back through their history and finds they were never a Dem voter in the first place.

3. This sort of ties into the last group but young people with a lot of economic anxiety. Many of the biggest economic problems right now (i.e. high housing prices) disproportionately affect young people while things that are doing well (i.e. the stock market) tend to not matter as much to younger folks. I  think many of these types use Israeli-Gaza as a vehicle to express their anger when the root of it is more based around the economy.

 2 
 on: Today at 07:26:03 PM 
Started by Arizona Iced Tea - Last post by ProgressiveModerate
I think the angriest will just stay home, vote third party or leave the presidential ballot blank. Ultimately, though, most will still vote Biden because they know Trump will be worse for Gaza and Muslim Americans.

I think the discontent runs deeper than you give it credit for. There’s still time for things to change, though.

I think there are many groups using Israeli/Gaza as a reason to express deeper anger towards Biden.

1. I made a thread about this a while back but many Arab Americans were already going to flip to Trump or at least not vote for Biden pre-10/7 due to some of their more socially conservative religious views. This can be shown in the 2022 midterm results where places like Dearborn and Hamtramack in MI were the only parts of the state to swing hard right from 2020 Pres --> 2022 Gov and this was pre 10/7.

2. Many progressives who were never going to vote for Biden - many of whom perhaps didn't vote for him in 2020 or Clinton in 2016. These types are angry and want to burn the system down which they don't see Biden as the right person for. There are so many cases I've seen online where a progressive twitter or Instagram account says "I'm so fed up and won't be voting for Biden" - then people go back through their history and finds they were never a Dem voter in the first place.

3. This sort of ties into the last group but young people with a lot of economic anxiety. Many of the biggest economic problems right now (i.e. high housing prices) disproportionately affect young people while things that are doing well (i.e. the stock market) tend to not matter as much to younger folks. I  think many of these types use Israeli-Gaza as a vehicle to express their anger when the root of it is more based around the economy.

 3 
 on: Today at 07:24:21 PM 
Started by MR DARK BRANDON - Last post by DrScholl
McLaughlin is horrible so if they best they can manage for Trump is a tie...

 4 
 on: Today at 07:24:06 PM 
Started by Born to Slay. Forced to Work. - Last post by GeorgiaModerate

The present participle of the verb Wyome.

 5 
 on: Today at 07:22:46 PM 
Started by Woody - Last post by DrScholl
Yawn. Anonymous Democrats panicking is the most tired sort of article there is.

 6 
 on: Today at 07:19:20 PM 
Started by Woody - Last post by ProgressiveModerate
It's kind of interesting how fast Georgia went from the swing state Democrats felt most optimistic about to arguably the state they're most pessimistic about.

After 2020 and 2021, Democrats sort of had a honeymoon phase in Georgia where it was assumed Atlanta's growth and increasing black population would pull the state left for the long run. Then in 2022 Democrats had a pretty underwhelming midterm in GA outside the Senate race failing to come close at the state level. Now in 2024, polling and pundits both suggests Trump winning Georgia with relative ease.

Regardless of if Trump ends up winning GA or not, this shows how fast a narrative about a state can turn around.

 7 
 on: Today at 07:18:02 PM 
Started by President Punxsutawney Phil - Last post by politicallefty
I'll try to avoid issues where the party largely agrees on principle, but disagrees on how to get there (such as Medicare-for-All when it comes to universal healthcare).

1. Affirmative action - This is an issue I think the the Supreme Court got right in its case last year.

2. Government efficiency/inefficiency - This isn't really a disagreement, but more about focus. As the party of making government work for the people, not taking a strong stand on the inefficiencies of government seriously frustrates me and has the effect of undermining the work being done. Part of this includes unnecessary regulations and red tape. At the state level, a great example of inefficiency and the absurdities of government is the California High-Speed Rail project. I support the adoption of high-speed rail across the country, but not costing 50x what it should cost and taking 5-10x as long as it should.

3. Nanny statism - I do think there is a tendency on the left to try to control and micromanage people's lives.

It's hard to come up with concrete criticisms of the Democratic party as a whole.

Progressive Democrats:
wealth tax, hostility towards entrepreneurship

Dem establishment:
NIMBYism, restrictive zoning policies

Atlas D-avatars:
full federal marijuana legalization

I don't think NIMBYism is a party issue. It's definitely both parties, but I would agree insofar as Democrats don't do anything to help the situation. There are too many burdensome regulations and there is too much red tape getting in the way of progress and truly helping people.

 8 
 on: Today at 07:16:42 PM 
Started by GeorgiaModerate - Last post by GeorgiaModerate


 9 
 on: Today at 07:16:09 PM 
Started by iceman - Last post by ProgressiveModerate
I feel like New York, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Georgia would be the best states to look at for if this is true. All these states have substantial pockets of >95% black precincts.

While yes, Virginia and North Carolina have decent black populations, both are more scattered and so you don't have that many >95% black precincts or >505 black counties in either. In 2022 for instance, the topline results in those states may have made you think black voters swung right, but looking under the surface it seems like lower black turnout contributed to the rightwards swing of the blackbelt more than black voters actually shifting right.


 10 
 on: Today at 07:14:21 PM 
Started by Horus - Last post by Meclazine for Israel
At this point, the US and Israeli military are intertwined in a massive intelligence gathering operation over about 4 to 5 countries

The point is probably that the US has no soldiers on the ground at the moment in Israel or Ukraine. Hence, it's probably better to fund these other agents or proxies.

What does sending Israel more weapons have to do with intelligence gathering?

Quote
As long as the weapons get built in the US, it's a win-win for both parties.

And what does padding the profits of US defense contractors have to do with intelligence gathering?

I will let Benjamin Netanyahu explain it for you.

Interview about Israeli Intelligence Benefits for the US

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-sICNOmqvo

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 10 queries.