Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:59:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1
« previous next »
Thread note

Pages: 1 ... 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 ... 179
Author Topic: Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1  (Read 213252 times)
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3600 on: November 09, 2018, 08:30:50 PM »

Those are only like a fraction of the CA votes in, right? So honestly it looks like Ds may sweep all of them.

AP officially called CA25 for Katie Hill, too

Only CA-39 and CA-10 are in doubt at this point.  CA-39 probably leans to Cisneros now.  Denham really could hold on though as that wasn't much of a shift.

Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3601 on: November 09, 2018, 08:31:00 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,001
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3602 on: November 09, 2018, 08:31:29 PM »

Can someone explain why the networks haven't called NY-22 for Brindisi yet?

Probably going to go to a recount after there was a tabulation error.

So it's okay when a Republican like Tenney does it, but Nelson doing the same thing in a state where this happens all too often is theft? That's Republican logic for you.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,104
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3603 on: November 09, 2018, 08:32:20 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3604 on: November 09, 2018, 08:34:40 PM »

Filling in a bubble isn't rocket science people.

We're talking about American voters here. Don't be too hard on them.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3605 on: November 09, 2018, 08:36:46 PM »

Filling in a bubble isn't rocket science people.

We're talking about American voters here. Don't be too hard on them.

Yeah, and we need to grade Florida in particular on a curve.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,693
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3606 on: November 09, 2018, 08:40:33 PM »

Those are only like a fraction of the CA votes in, right? So honestly it looks like Ds may sweep all of them.

AP officially called CA25 for Katie Hill, too

Only CA-39 and CA-10 are in doubt at this point.  CA-39 probably leans to Cisneros now.  Denham really could hold on though as that wasn't much of a shift.



Good!   The Northern Cal house map will looks so much more aesthetic with CA-10 as a dem seat!
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3607 on: November 09, 2018, 08:42:58 PM »

So first CA flip post-election night? Woot!

Hopefully Porter is next.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3608 on: November 09, 2018, 08:47:20 PM »

I'm just going to assume all the media outlets have been ordered by the Kremlin to not call this for Rouda. He's obviously won.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3609 on: November 09, 2018, 08:49:15 PM »

It's amazing how Republicans are slowly going extinct in California.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,693
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3610 on: November 09, 2018, 08:54:56 PM »

It's amazing how Republicans are slowly going extinct in California.

Yep,  Democrats can potentially win >70% of the seats in both the state senate and state house this year.   That's nuts.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3611 on: November 09, 2018, 08:57:01 PM »

It's amazing how Republicans are slowly going extinct in California.

It's a beautiful sight. Now, if only the rest of the country could follow suit.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3612 on: November 09, 2018, 08:58:16 PM »

Mimi Walters is only up by 2,020 votes at the moment. 103,975-101,955.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3613 on: November 09, 2018, 09:01:19 PM »

Mimi Walters is only up by 2,020 votes at the moment. 103,975-101,955.
She won 59-41 two years ago.  That's a crazy turnaround in two years.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,614


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3614 on: November 09, 2018, 09:01:25 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.

Those polls were obvious bullsh**t having Trumps approval at even in a district he lost by 7
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3615 on: November 09, 2018, 09:03:32 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.

Those polls were obvious bullsh**t having Trumps approval at even in a district he lost by 7

It seems that was a good way to tell whether a poll was junk or not. All those polls showing him evenly split in Missouri and Indiana - junk. All those polls showing him evenly split or positive in districts he lost or in Nevada/Arizona - junk.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,811
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3616 on: November 09, 2018, 09:16:01 PM »

Those are only like a fraction of the CA votes in, right? So honestly it looks like Ds may sweep all of them.

AP officially called CA25 for Katie Hill, too

Only CA-39 and CA-10 are in doubt at this point.  CA-39 probably leans to Cisneros now.  Denham really could hold on though as that wasn't much of a shift.



Good!   The Northern Cal house map will looks so much more aesthetic with CA-10 as a dem seat!

Well, that was fast.  Apparently his base was disproportionately out and just updated?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,614


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3617 on: November 09, 2018, 09:20:23 PM »
« Edited: November 09, 2018, 09:23:41 PM by lfromnj »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.

Those polls were obvious bullsh**t having Trumps approval at even in a district he lost by 7

It seems that was a good way to tell whether a poll was junk or not. All those polls showing him evenly split in Missouri and Indiana - junk. All those polls showing him evenly split or positive in districts he lost or in Nevada/Arizona - junk.

I knew rohrabacher was doomed after that monmouth poll showing Putin at 50 and Rouda at 48 with trump at 54 approval. I was criticized for daring to unskew an obviously bullsh**t poll when Trumps approval there was -6 TOPS and thats generous. Its much better to look at polls in a national context and estimate what Trumps realistic approval should be looking at 538's trump approval for likely voters.  Here is the monmouth poll . https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_ca_091818.pdf/

The only reason hurd survived this year was due to national dem laziness to notice the polls were absolute bullsh**t in hispanic areas. Thank god about that. Then again dems got to steal NJ 2nd in return.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3618 on: November 09, 2018, 09:25:23 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.

Those polls were obvious bullsh**t having Trumps approval at even in a district he lost by 7

It seems that was a good way to tell whether a poll was junk or not. All those polls showing him evenly split in Missouri and Indiana - junk. All those polls showing him evenly split or positive in districts he lost or in Nevada/Arizona - junk.

I knew rohrabacher was doomed after that monmouth poll showing Putin at 50 and Rouda at 48 with trump at 54 approval. I was criticized for daring to unskew an obviously bullsh**t poll when Trumps approval there was -6 TOPS and thats generous. Its much better to look at polls in a national context and estimate what Trumps realistic approval should be looking at 538's trump approval for likely voters.  Here is the monmouth poll . https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_ca_091818.pdf/

The only reason hurd survived this year was due to national dem laziness to notice the polls were absolute bullsh**t in hispanic areas. Thank god about that. Then again dems got to steal NJ 2nd in return.
Regarding TX-23, I'd honestly ask for a recount if I were Oritz-Jones.  The gap is way too narrow to take a chance at just conceding.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,047
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3619 on: November 09, 2018, 09:29:23 PM »

Republicans whipping themselves into a frenzy on Arizona on Fox and everywhere else

Because they know they're going to lose.
Logged
Snipee356
Rookie
**
Posts: 194
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3620 on: November 09, 2018, 09:29:45 PM »

I don't even understand what straws the Reps are grasping at. What are the 'improper practices' going on in AZ? Counting votes?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3621 on: November 09, 2018, 09:31:32 PM »

Republicans whipping themselves into a frenzy on Arizona on Fox and everywhere else

There is a report from Politico that Trump and the RNC are pissed with McSally and local Arizona Republicans for not being more aggressive.

Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,047
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3622 on: November 09, 2018, 09:37:22 PM »

Republicans whipping themselves into a frenzy on Arizona on Fox and everywhere else

There is a report from Politico that Trump and the RNC are pissed with McSally and local Arizona Republicans for not being more aggressive.



The AZ GOP got curbstomped. It's not healthy for them to go full bat-sh**t insane in a state that is trending away from them.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,614


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3623 on: November 09, 2018, 09:37:57 PM »

Kim is almost certainly going to lose.

Remember that poll showing her ahead by double digits?
Fun times.

Those polls were obvious bullsh**t having Trumps approval at even in a district he lost by 7

It seems that was a good way to tell whether a poll was junk or not. All those polls showing him evenly split in Missouri and Indiana - junk. All those polls showing him evenly split or positive in districts he lost or in Nevada/Arizona - junk.

I knew rohrabacher was doomed after that monmouth poll showing Putin at 50 and Rouda at 48 with trump at 54 approval. I was criticized for daring to unskew an obviously bullsh**t poll when Trumps approval there was -6 TOPS and thats generous. Its much better to look at polls in a national context and estimate what Trumps realistic approval should be looking at 538's trump approval for likely voters.  Here is the monmouth poll . https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_ca_091818.pdf/

The only reason hurd survived this year was due to national dem laziness to notice the polls were absolute bullsh**t in hispanic areas. Thank god about that. Then again dems got to steal NJ 2nd in return.
Regarding TX-23, I'd honestly ask for a recount if I were Oritz-Jones.  The gap is way too narrow to take a chance at just conceding.


Id say its likely Hurd survives but a recount here is fine and might work especially in a district with both large rural and suburban areas. Anyway Illegal border crosser polling and racist white hick polling sucked this year.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,916
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3624 on: November 09, 2018, 09:48:05 PM »

No they didn’t. They won Gov by 16%, held the legislature and narrowly lost two statewide races (maybe a third with SOS). Losing a Senate seat is certainly not good, but it was not a curb-stomping

^ I would listen to this gentleman. He's the entire reason we even say curb/burb-stomping Curly
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 ... 179  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 8 queries.