Georgia senate seats runoff(s) megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 09:42:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Georgia senate seats runoff(s) megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 226
Author Topic: Georgia senate seats runoff(s) megathread  (Read 263245 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: November 20, 2020, 07:32:10 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,477
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: November 20, 2020, 07:35:38 PM »

Rs are hurting themselves due to fact Trump is contesting the GA Elections and Covid relief is still floundering around and McConnell went home again. Rs don't take a hint what happened after McConnell adjourned last time.

Both parties have played politics with the people's money 2.2T stimulus
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: November 20, 2020, 07:41:27 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: November 20, 2020, 07:44:57 PM »
« Edited: November 20, 2020, 07:50:17 PM by KaiserDave »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.

Perfectly responsible comparison.

Throwing money at a race doesn't mean you win. How many times will super funded candidates have to lose for people to understand this.

We had the ultimate experiment with Michael Bloomberg, who went down in flames despite spending an ungodly mountain of cash.

Edit: It's not like Republicans weren't attacking Manchin on guns lol

Yes, WV and MT were races Republicans neglected. But it's more than just throwing cash, Rosendale and Morrisey were not the best candidates and had weak messages.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: November 20, 2020, 07:53:37 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.

Perfectly responsible comparison.

Throwing money at a race doesn't mean you win. How many times will super funded candidates have to lose for people to understand this.

We had the ultimate experiment with Michael Bloomberg, who went down in flames despite spending an ungodly mountain of cash.


Throwing money in a state / district which is fundamentally hostile to you is not going to help you if the message is so so, sure, now throwing money in a state / district which structurally leans your way will at least help you to destroy the image of your opponent and to nationalize the race, and when a race which takes place on favourable ground is nationalised you will win it (see Peterson fall in Minnesota).
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: November 20, 2020, 07:55:49 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.

Perfectly responsible comparison.

Throwing money at a race doesn't mean you win. How many times will super funded candidates have to lose for people to understand this.

We had the ultimate experiment with Michael Bloomberg, who went down in flames despite spending an ungodly mountain of cash.


Throwing money in a state / district which is fundamentally hostile to you is not going to help you if the message is so so, sure, now throwing money in a state / district which structurally leans your way will at least help you to destroy the image of your opponent and to nationalize the race, and when a race which takes place on favourable ground is nationalised you will win it (see Peterson fall in Minnesota).
And? Republicans spent in West Virginia and Montana. Trump visited Montana more than any other state. It's true that the NRSC wasted time in Nevada, Wisconsin, and Arizona that year but just spending more isn't going to win.

Sarah Gideon had a mountain of dollars in a state Biden won by 10. It did her no good because her message was bad.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: November 20, 2020, 07:57:32 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.

Perfectly responsible comparison.

Throwing money at a race doesn't mean you win. How many times will super funded candidates have to lose for people to understand this.

We had the ultimate experiment with Michael Bloomberg, who went down in flames despite spending an ungodly mountain of cash.


Throwing money in a state / district which is fundamentally hostile to you is not going to help you if the message is so so, sure, now throwing money in a state / district which structurally leans your way will at least help you to destroy the image of your opponent and to nationalize the race, and when a race which takes place on favourable ground is nationalised you will win it (see Peterson fall in Minnesota).
And? Republicans spent in West Virginia and Montana. Trump visited Montana more than any other state. It's true that the NRSC wasted time in Nevada, Wisconsin, and Arizona that year but just spending more isn't going to win.

Sarah Gideon had a mountain of dollars in a state Biden won by 10. It did her no good because her message was bad.

Manchin outspent Morrissey by 2 to 1 ratio, in MT it was even worse.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: November 20, 2020, 08:00:43 PM »

Just imagine if a fraction of this money had been spent against Manchin and Tester in 2018.

Shouting a bad message louder doesn't mean you win.

Paging Senator-elect Gideon and Harrison


Absurd comparison.

Money will help you when you are running on favourable ground as it can help you drive down the image of your opponent (if you spend $ 45M of negative ads against Manchin in which you attack him on his anti guns positions you can bet it will damage him), now sure if you are running in a hostile state money will have a more limited effect.

Perfectly responsible comparison.

Throwing money at a race doesn't mean you win. How many times will super funded candidates have to lose for people to understand this.

We had the ultimate experiment with Michael Bloomberg, who went down in flames despite spending an ungodly mountain of cash.


Throwing money in a state / district which is fundamentally hostile to you is not going to help you if the message is so so, sure, now throwing money in a state / district which structurally leans your way will at least help you to destroy the image of your opponent and to nationalize the race, and when a race which takes place on favourable ground is nationalised you will win it (see Peterson fall in Minnesota).
And? Republicans spent in West Virginia and Montana. Trump visited Montana more than any other state. It's true that the NRSC wasted time in Nevada, Wisconsin, and Arizona that year but just spending more isn't going to win.

Sarah Gideon had a mountain of dollars in a state Biden won by 10. It did her no good because her message was bad.

Manchin outspent Morrissey by 2 to 1 ratio, in MT it was even worse.

Okay? Matching spending enough wasn't going to save Morrisey and Rosendale.

They had flawed messages and weak campaigns.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: November 20, 2020, 08:03:25 PM »

In a midterm election cycle, #candidatequality matters more.

Rosendale and especially Morrisey were weak.

Tim Fox and Evan Jenkins would certainly have done better.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: November 20, 2020, 08:25:44 PM »

In a midterm election cycle, #candidatequality matters more.

Rosendale and especially Morrisey were weak.

Tim Fox and Evan Jenkins would certainly have done better.
Evan Jenkins would probably beaten Manchin but I'm not sure if Fox would have done so. Nobody would have beaten Tester unless if Zinke didn't leave for secretary of interior and ran against him in 2018
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: November 20, 2020, 08:32:15 PM »

Lol, very sad I missed another round of the spending vs. message back and forth.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: November 20, 2020, 08:35:25 PM »

Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: November 20, 2020, 08:36:00 PM »

In a midterm election cycle, #candidatequality matters more.

Rosendale and especially Morrisey were weak.

Tim Fox and Evan Jenkins would certainly have done better.
Evan Jenkins would probably beaten Manchin but I'm not sure if Fox would have done so. Nobody would have beaten Tester unless if Zinke didn't leave for secretary of interior and ran against him in 2018

I agree. Fox vs Tester would have been quite close
Logged
QAnonKelly
dotard
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: November 20, 2020, 08:41:17 PM »



If she gets it from him and dies, don’t worry. It’ll only kill the horcrux he put in her on accident.
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: November 20, 2020, 08:49:04 PM »

Cocaine Mitch.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: November 20, 2020, 08:53:38 PM »


Awesome encourage it. Fight against the system
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,643
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: November 20, 2020, 08:55:52 PM »



Pweeeeassseee
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: November 20, 2020, 09:06:05 PM »


What's next, a car elevator?
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,562
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: November 20, 2020, 09:11:07 PM »

How in the world can someone who voted for Joe Biden vote for someone who uses the term "Deep State" unironically? And why does Qelly Loeffler think that going full-on batsh**t QAnon is going to help her win in a suddenly Blue State?

I was sure she'd drop all that nonsense and run back to the center, since the crazies are going to turn out and vote for her over Warnock anyway, but I guess she just is that much of a lunatic.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: November 20, 2020, 09:27:33 PM »

How in the world can someone who voted for Joe Biden vote for someone who uses the term "Deep State" unironically? And why does Qelly Loeffler think that going full-on batsh**t QAnon is going to help her win in a suddenly Blue State?

I was sure she'd drop all that nonsense and run back to the center, since the crazies are going to turn out and vote for her over Warnock anyway, but I guess she just is that much of a lunatic.
A Biden/Loeffler voter doesn't really exist. To win it would just be turnout and the composition of the electorate

Also the ironic part about complaining about the deep state is that Trump is hiring loyalists into key positions of the government to solely undermine Biden
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,477
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: November 20, 2020, 11:55:30 PM »

No one should underestimate Loeffler or Perdue, Loeffler is a commissioner from the WNBA, but Trump not conceding the election is making it hard for the Rs to hold these races
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: November 21, 2020, 12:48:44 AM »



KING OF THE SUBURBS DAVID PERDUE
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,581
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: November 21, 2020, 12:56:04 AM »


KING OF THE SUBURBS DAVID PERDUE

Disgusting
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,562
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: November 21, 2020, 01:00:13 AM »

^^ These are the few persuadable voters out there. Anyone who voted Biden has to be disgusted by Trump's actions and Perdue & Qelly's enabling of it.

Yes, this is a turnout election primarily, but W & O have to identify who these suburban Biden/GOP voters are and get them to reconsider.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -4.70

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: November 21, 2020, 01:11:26 AM »

Regular is Likely R; Special is Lean R. Biden only won Georgia because of Trump's collapse in the suburbs; these people are not giving Democrats a trifecta even though the filibuster is here to stay. Only hope for Democrats is if Republicans think the election will be rigged and don't show up.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 226  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 8 queries.