Official West Virginia Democratic Primary Discussion Thread...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:00:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Official West Virginia Democratic Primary Discussion Thread...
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11
Author Topic: Official West Virginia Democratic Primary Discussion Thread...  (Read 14413 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: May 13, 2008, 11:44:12 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Isn't every state "interesting" except for the ones where all you need is racial demographics and you can already draw the entire county map?

Those states are interesting too.

So then what states aren't interesting?

Minnesota and North Dakota.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: May 13, 2008, 11:44:31 PM »

brtd is so far gone that it isnt even worth arguing.

of course (the great) obama is going to win the presidency.  forget about florida, west virginia, michigan, pennsylvania  ohio/...the (great) obama is going to win virginia, georgia, and most importnatly kansas and the dakotas!!!!1333453i6u
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: May 13, 2008, 11:45:41 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Isn't every state "interesting" except for the ones where all you need is racial demographics and you can already draw the entire county map?

Those states are interesting too.

So then what states aren't interesting?

Minnesota and North Dakota.

I actually did find interesting quirks in the maps there, but how's ND not interesting and SD is?

brtd is so far gone that it isnt even worth arguing.

of course (the great) obama is going to win the presidency.  forget about florida, west virginia, michigan, pennsylvania  ohio/...the (great) obama is going to win virginia, georgia, and most importnatly kansas and the dakotas!!!!1333453i6u

Please find a post of mine where I have claimed Obama will win any of those states over McCain.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: May 13, 2008, 11:46:10 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

I was just hoping LOL. But what if she loses by 15 points? Is it onwards to lose in Montana and South Dakota? Or is she going to become puerto rican for a while?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: May 13, 2008, 11:49:06 PM »



And what are Montana and South Dakota? Latte liberal land?



Montana Democrats, pretty much; there the ties are more Pacific Northwest.  It also isn't a "plains state." 

SD, is a bit different, but it isn't white "working class," either.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: May 13, 2008, 11:49:57 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

I was just hoping LOL. But what if she loses by 15 points? Is it onwards to lose in Montana and South Dakota? Or is she going to become puerto rican for a while?

She may lose Oregon by 15 points, but she'll probably win Kentucky by 30.

I don't know what's going to happen in Montana and South Dakota and neither do you... (especially Montana)  Wink

Besides, if there's one thing we've learned about this campaign, it's that the right wing was wrong about many things Clinton and right about many things Clinton.  One of the things they were right on was that this woman will never quit or give in.  Ever.  Same with her husband.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: May 13, 2008, 11:52:33 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

I was just hoping LOL. But what if she loses by 15 points? Is it onwards to lose in Montana and South Dakota? Or is she going to become puerto rican for a while?

She may lose Oregon by 15 points, but she'll probably win Kentucky by 30.

I don't know what's going to happen in Montana and South Dakota and neither do you... (especially Montana)  Wink

Besides, if there's one thing we've learned about this campaign, it's that the right wing was wrong about many things Clinton and right about many things Clinton.  One of the things they were right on was that this woman will never quit or give in.  Ever.  Same with her husband.

I am pretty sure Montana will vote for Obama. pretty sure. Havent really seen any polling lately but it would puzzle me why it would vote different from all of its neighbors.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: May 13, 2008, 11:54:03 PM »

Montana and South Dakota will be interesting, actually.

Yes they will be provided they campaign there. I am guessing they will but OR could change that.

Hillary Clinton leaving after Oregon?  You're not being serious, are you?

I was just hoping LOL. But what if she loses by 15 points? Is it onwards to lose in Montana and South Dakota? Or is she going to become puerto rican for a while?

She may lose Oregon by 15 points, but she'll probably win Kentucky by 30.

I don't know what's going to happen in Montana and South Dakota and neither do you... (especially Montana)  Wink

Besides, if there's one thing we've learned about this campaign, it's that the right wing was wrong about many things Clinton and right about many things Clinton.  One of the things they were right on was that this woman will never quit or give in.  Ever.  Same with her husband.

It's next to impossible for Clinton to win it clean, but it is possible for her to win it.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: May 13, 2008, 11:55:07 PM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: May 13, 2008, 11:57:37 PM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Of course, who hasn't.  Doesn't seem to affect the bitch much.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: May 13, 2008, 11:59:40 PM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Of course, who hasn't.  Doesn't seem to affect the bitch much.


Sure she can stay in as long as she wants, but that doesn't increase her chances of winning the nomination anymore than Paul sticking in increases his chances.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,800
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: May 14, 2008, 12:01:04 AM »

Well, Clinton has won her second state without losing a single county (Rhode Island was number one, but it only has four...)

I hoped Obama would at least get 30%. What did 7% of people vote for? The numbers don't add up.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: May 14, 2008, 12:01:41 AM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Yes, maybe the fifty that Obama promised in March might be out by now.

As a group, they have yet to step in (which tells you more about the super delegates than the race).

Really, to end this, there needs to be an en masse movement in the triple digits to one candidate or the other.  For whatever reason, they are not doing that, as of yet.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: May 14, 2008, 12:02:46 AM »

What did 7% of people vote for? The numbers don't add up.

Edwards.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: May 14, 2008, 12:05:51 AM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Yes, maybe the fifty that Obama promised in March might be out by now.

As a group, they have yet to step in (which tells you more about the super delegates than the race).

Really, to end this, there needs to be an en masse movement in the triple digits to one candidate or the other.  For whatever reason, they are not doing that, as of yet.

Triple digits? Obama needs only about 50-60. Hillary meanwhile needs close to 200, and more than 80% of the remaining total.

If all the remaining superdelegates slowly trickle in at a 50/50 split (very generous to Hillary), Obama wins it.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,198
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #240 on: May 14, 2008, 12:23:51 AM »

LOL @ Mingo County: 8% Obama, 4% Edwards.

Can`t wait for Eastern Kentucky ... Wink
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,214


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #241 on: May 14, 2008, 12:25:55 AM »

I'm sure the Clinton campaign is ready to unleash the moonshine in Eastern Kentucky too.

Yay votebuying!
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #242 on: May 14, 2008, 12:33:50 AM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Yes, maybe the fifty that Obama promised in March might be out by now.

As a group, they have yet to step in (which tells you more about the super delegates than the race).

Really, to end this, there needs to be an en masse movement in the triple digits to one candidate or the other.  For whatever reason, they are not doing that, as of yet.

Triple digits? Obama needs only about 50-60. Hillary meanwhile needs close to 200, and more than 80% of the remaining total.

If all the remaining superdelegates slowly trickle in at a 50/50 split (very generous to Hillary), Obama wins it.

I repeat, either candidate needs triple digits to end this:

Need to Nominate   2,026.0
B Obama                        1,878.5

A slow trickle doesn't end it and that's without FL/MI; it has to be dramatic.  A 26 delegate gain , per week, will end it in mid-June.  There has to be a dramatic shift to Obama, or he has to win net gains on the ground. 

What's his ground game been like from April (Wright/bitter) to today, a slight net loss for Obama.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,435
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #243 on: May 14, 2008, 12:51:55 AM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Yes, maybe the fifty that Obama promised in March might be out by now.

As a group, they have yet to step in (which tells you more about the super delegates than the race).

Really, to end this, there needs to be an en masse movement in the triple digits to one candidate or the other.  For whatever reason, they are not doing that, as of yet.

Triple digits? Obama needs only about 50-60. Hillary meanwhile needs close to 200, and more than 80% of the remaining total.

If all the remaining superdelegates slowly trickle in at a 50/50 split (very generous to Hillary), Obama wins it.

I repeat, either candidate needs triple digits to end this:

Need to Nominate   2,026.0
B Obama                        1,878.5

A slow trickle doesn't end it and that's without FL/MI; it has to be dramatic.  A 26 delegate gain , per week, will end it in mid-June.  There has to be a dramatic shift to Obama, or he has to win net gains on the ground. 

What's his ground game been like from April (Wright/bitter) to today, a slight net loss for Obama.

He only needs about 50-60 after adding all the delegates he'll win in the remaining primaries.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #244 on: May 14, 2008, 01:56:19 AM »

Were there any counties where Edwards beat Obama?  Will Edwards be allocated delegates?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,895
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #245 on: May 14, 2008, 04:53:17 AM »

I'm sure the Clinton campaign is ready to unleash the moonshine in Eastern Kentucky too.

Yay votebuying!

It's part of the culture of the area and needs to be respected Tongue
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,895
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #246 on: May 14, 2008, 05:02:45 AM »

So then, did McDowell vote any differently from the other southern coalfield counties [qm]

Slightly; Obama actually broke 20% there.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,895
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #247 on: May 14, 2008, 05:21:45 AM »

I think it's pretty ridiculous that whites are only "working class" if they live in Appalachia.

Appalachia is unusual for the States in that a majority of whites there are working class.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #248 on: May 14, 2008, 08:56:12 AM »

Has anyone been paying attention to what superdelegates are doing the last few days at all?

Yes, maybe the fifty that Obama promised in March might be out by now.

As a group, they have yet to step in (which tells you more about the super delegates than the race).

Really, to end this, there needs to be an en masse movement in the triple digits to one candidate or the other.  For whatever reason, they are not doing that, as of yet.

Triple digits? Obama needs only about 50-60. Hillary meanwhile needs close to 200, and more than 80% of the remaining total.

If all the remaining superdelegates slowly trickle in at a 50/50 split (very generous to Hillary), Obama wins it.

I repeat, either candidate needs triple digits to end this:

Need to Nominate   2,026.0
B Obama                        1,878.5

A slow trickle doesn't end it and that's without FL/MI; it has to be dramatic.  A 26 delegate gain , per week, will end it in mid-June.  There has to be a dramatic shift to Obama, or he has to win net gains on the ground. 

What's his ground game been like from April (Wright/bitter) to today, a slight net loss for Obama.

He only needs about 50-60 after adding all the delegates he'll win in the remaining primaries.

Then it doesn't end it, now, but sometime in early to mid June, at the earliest.  That assumes that he gains and that those 50-60 will move then.  They don't really have to move until August, late August.

Right now, either candidate would need triple digits to end this.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #249 on: May 14, 2008, 11:08:49 AM »

Right now, Barack Obama only needs 30% of the remaining delegates to clinch the nomination.  He will lose Kentucky and Puerto Rico pretty bad, but he'll make it up in Oregon, Montana, and South Dakota.

Get this:  Even if Obama loses Kentucky and Puerto Rico 70-30, he will still be on track to clinch the nomination if he were to lose the last three states 70-30.

That is saying nothing of how damaged he would be going into November if he were to lose the last 5 states 70-30 and limp into the nomination, but it gives you an idea how bad her chances are.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 9 queries.