The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 11:49:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 18
Author Topic: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread  (Read 1266909 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #225 on: September 02, 2009, 02:25:21 PM »

Democratic party ID advantage down 12 points since January and is now D+5.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/122693/Democratic-Advantage-Party-Affiliation-Shrinks.aspx
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #226 on: September 03, 2009, 02:56:03 PM »

Nevada(Kos)

Favorable 48%
Unfavorable 41%

http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/9/2/NV/357
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #227 on: September 03, 2009, 06:22:53 PM »

You seem to be forgetting that Obama won NV by 13 points. Also, this is favorables, not approval which would be lower. And plus, it's a Kos poll.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #228 on: September 04, 2009, 04:21:06 PM »

Hmm, he definitely seems to be getting a bit of a boost. That's good news going into this speech and whatnot.

I was reading somewhere that Obama's made a net gain of 17 on Gallup in a week. Definately some momentum building.

Uhh 17? I doubt that.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #229 on: September 06, 2009, 03:10:20 PM »

Gallup drops again today:

Approve 52%(-1)
Disapprove 41%(+1)
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #230 on: September 09, 2009, 12:08:22 PM »

AP/GfK

Approve 50%
Disapprove 49%

http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com/pdf/AP-GfK_Poll_Healthcare_Politics_Topline.pdf
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #231 on: September 09, 2009, 05:42:08 PM »

Massachusetts(Rasmussen)

Approve 58%
Disapprove 41%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/toplines/toplines_massachusetts_interim_senator_september_8_2009
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #232 on: September 10, 2009, 11:13:56 AM »

North Carolina(PPP)

Approve 45%
Disapprove 51%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NC_910.pdf

North Carolina(Civitas)

Approve 44%
Disapprove 46%

http://www.nccivitas.org/files/CFP%20Obama%20Sep%2009%20CTs.pdf

New Jersey(Rasmussen)

Approve 53%
Disapprove 45%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2009/new_jersey/toplines/toplines_new_jersey_governor_september_9_2009

Illinois(Chicago Tribune)

Approve 59%
Disapprove 33%

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-090903-poll-obama,0,5074975.graphic
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #233 on: September 10, 2009, 04:36:25 PM »

Colorado(Rasmussen)

Approve 51%
Disapprove 48%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/colorado/toplines/toplines_2010_colorado_senate_september_9_2009
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #234 on: September 11, 2009, 11:48:19 AM »

Why anyone would take a KOS poll seriously is beyond me.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #235 on: September 11, 2009, 12:32:22 PM »

Why anyone would take a KOS poll seriously is beyond me.

Because they were accurate last year?

They had Obama up double-digits practically the whole time, and then made it close at the end to save face. If you looked at their poll you would think that McCain had a great final two weeks the way the gap shrunk.

But anyway, look at their sample, it's terrible. 17% "Non-Voters"? What the hell is that? Almost more of these "Non-voters" than Republicans.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #236 on: September 11, 2009, 02:53:38 PM »

JC isn't a hack, just an idiot.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #237 on: September 12, 2009, 05:51:00 PM »

Um, he is still under 50% on the question, that's not good.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #238 on: September 14, 2009, 01:36:45 PM »

Arkansas(KOS)

Favorable 41%
Unfavorable 55%

http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/9/10/AR/371
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #239 on: September 14, 2009, 03:02:23 PM »

Again, you are missing the difference between favorability and approval.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #240 on: September 15, 2009, 12:04:44 PM »

Gallup

52(-1)
41(+1)
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #241 on: September 15, 2009, 01:42:33 PM »

Nevada should be yellow.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #242 on: September 15, 2009, 02:55:23 PM »


That's about the health care legislation. Nothing is said of President Obama except that he supports it.

No.

1* How would you rate the job Barack Obama has been doing as President… do you strongly approve, somewhat approve, somewhat disapprove, or strongly disapprove of the job he’s been doing?

37% Strongly approve
9% Somewhat approve
8% Somewhat disapprove
45% Strongly disapprove
1% Not sure
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #243 on: September 15, 2009, 03:18:38 PM »

Do I have to hold your hand?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/nevada/toplines/toplines_2010_nevada_senate_september_14_2009
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #244 on: September 16, 2009, 12:18:12 PM »

New Hampshire(Rasmussen)

Approve 50%
Disapprove 50%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/new_hampshire/toplines/toplines_new_hampshire_senate_september_14_2009

Colorado(Rasmussen)

Approve 48%
Disapprove 51%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/colorado/toplines/toplines_2010_colorado_senate_september_15_2009
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #245 on: September 16, 2009, 12:22:38 PM »

New Jersey(PPP)

Approve 45%
Disapprove 48%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NJ_916.pdf
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #246 on: September 16, 2009, 12:53:22 PM »

Is that just likely voters in this falls election? it would seem very odd to me if obama had a lower approval rating in NJ than CO.

2009 Likely Voters. PPP said that the 2008 electorate would extrapolate to a 51/43 approval.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #247 on: September 16, 2009, 12:53:48 PM »

Make NJ yellow.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #248 on: September 16, 2009, 01:04:42 PM »


Why would you use 2009 LV's instead of 2008 electorate?  I can see an argument for 2008 electorate measure not being included on the map, but why use the number from an election that's obviously going to be less reflective of any Presidential electorate?

Because you can't cherry pick the numbers. NH and CO are both 2010 likely voters, should those not be included either?
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #249 on: September 16, 2009, 02:59:54 PM »

You're an idiot. The CO, NH, and VA numbers were all included in election polls too. Be honest, you are not including NJ because you don't like what it shows.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 18  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 11 queries.