Comedy Goldmine 3: The Mineshaft--SHAFT!

[afleitch]

Apparently Clinton didn't make any mistakes in debates.

Robot engineers are near flawless these days, Gabu.

[Sensei]

I would motorboat those warlocks...after I put a paper bag over her face

[Platypus]

Definitely not hot, and only accessible by boat or plane.

Click for context.

I'm prusuming he stole my idea about Juno/Juneau

[Filuwaúrdjan]

Thoughts?

Best "role" for Joe Biden... Hmm...

Polonius seems about right....

[Joe Republic]

Definitely not hot, and only accessible by boat or plane.

Click for context.

I'm prusuming he stole my idea about Juno/Juneau

Nope, sorry.  I happened to see the Juno thread just as I was reading (and later re-posted in the forum) a news article about Juneau.

[Platypus]

Definitely not hot, and only accessible by boat or plane.

Click for context.

I'm prusuming he stole my idea about Juno/Juneau

Nope, sorry.  I happened to see the Juno thread just as I was reading (and later re-posted in the forum) a news article about Juneau.

Oh, I didn't post my thoughts, I just claimed it as my own.

[Platypus]

Beelzebush.  He changed 50 years of foreign and military policy with a completely new, revolutionary doctrine:  Attack the country that DIDN'T attack you.

[Keystone Phil]

Do you believe that Keystone Phil should be prosecuted for attempting to enter a second registration whilst controlling the account of Mike Naso?

I believe that justice should be served and that Keystone Phil should be executed.

When Ronald Reagan was goverenor of California, he went through somewhat this same type of happening. Reagan decided that justice should be served and the man was executed.

I believe that I would do the same thing that Reagan did and would let justice be served. This means that Keystone Phil should be executed. However, it is  not my choice but that of the justices of the Atlasian supreme court, not me. This is only my opinion. Thank you.

LOL yes!

[Gabu]

LOL yes!

You better watch out, Phil; gporter is coming for your head!

[John Dibble]

This is the main reason why I'm not supporting Barack Obama:

To be fair to Senator Obama, his expression suggests that he may have been urinating on her feet.

[J. J.]

Clinton 35%
Obama 32%
Edwards 15%

Goldmine material.

Yes, yes it is.

[Keystone Phil]

Clinton 35%
Obama 32%
Edwards 15%

Goldmine material.

Yes, yes it is.

LOL @ Eraserhead! I know I called for an Obama victory, too, but the bragging from the Obama people was out of control. I'm loving this!

[J. J.]

I'm thinking of doing a series from the poster formerly known a JFern from the NH Primary thread.  Except for the last post, it's classic spin.

[Robespierre's Jaw]

You people only dislike Sen. Clinton because she makes your penises feel uncomfortable.

[afleitch]

Not really. It is not the literal truth; not Adam or Eve, or Eden or the tree. It's symbolic.

Please tell me I am misreading this.  Please tell me you're not seriously attempting to claim that Adam and Eve never existed.

As if to claim such a thing is ludicrous

[Filuwaúrdjan]

Considering it was covered in our local paper, yes. They proceeded to wildly estimate Kucinich's chances of getting his hands on the launch codes.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

Not really. It is not the literal truth; not Adam or Eve, or Eden or the tree. It's symbolic.

Please tell me I am misreading this.  Please tell me you're not seriously attempting to claim that Adam and Eve never existed.

As if to claim such a thing is ludicrous

yes, it is lucicrous for a Christian to take positions contrary to Christ's and the Apostles' own beliefs...futhermore, everywhere in the book of Genesis where it says "This is the account of...", you're basically saying scripture is lying and that it is not an historical account.   

For a Christian to basically claim that the scripture outright lies and that Jesus Christ himself was deceived by the book of Genesis is simply...weird, dude!

but, if you would like to explain your logic, then please do so in the original thread

[afleitch]

How is that any different than saying demon possession doesn't exist even though Christ spoke about it and casts demons out of people?

[Speed of Sound]

Not really. It is not the literal truth; not Adam or Eve, or Eden or the tree. It's symbolic.

Please tell me I am misreading this.  Please tell me you're not seriously attempting to claim that Adam and Eve never existed.

Quick interjection: This is the opinion of a large chunk of the Christian Community, especially in the US.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_comp.htm

Just 33% of Americans believe that the Bible is the direct word of a god, and that it shouldnt all be taken literally. (1991) Reference: At the time, 84% ID'ed themselves as Christian.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

How is that any different than saying demon possession doesn't exist even though Christ spoke about it and casts demons out of people?

now you're mocking demon possession? 

so, you believe Jesus' ability to drive out demons was simply a deception?

[Alcon]

No debates in Comedy Goldmine.  Stop.  Thanks.

[Hash]

No debates in Comedy Goldmine.  Stop.  Thanks.

Thank you. The whole retarded religious debate has gone a bit too far.

[bullmoose88]

We should just create a thread for jmfcst to Bible thump and fight with alfeitch and keep it out of here. At least everyone should pledge to never debate jmfcst in this thread.

We should have a religion child board...

[Speed of Sound]

We should just create a thread for jmfcst to Bible thump and fight with alfeitch and keep it out of here. At least everyone should pledge to never debate jmfcst in this thread.

We should have a religion child board...

Only if you name it whatit really would be: "Obnoxious Extremist Hackery Religion Board"

Today's (and everyday's) topic: Extremist Christians and Extremist Atheists duke it out in ridiculous quoting/shouting/nit picking match!!!!!!!!

[bullmoose88]

We should just create a thread for jmfcst to Bible thump and fight with alfeitch and keep it out of here. At least everyone should pledge to never debate jmfcst in this thread.

We should have a religion child board...

Only if you name it whatit really would be: "Obnoxious Extremist Hackery Religion Board"

Today's (and everyday's) topic: Extremist Christians and Extremist Atheists duke it out in ridiculous quoting/shouting/nit picking match!!!!!!!!

But the fight here is not between an extreme christian and extreme atheist...it is between different views of Christianity.