Petition to ban Woody/Sir Woodbury

[Lykaon]

If anyone else is sick of this Russian fanboy cheerleading on a genocidal maniac, sign here

[Crumpets]

[Lykaon]

Ron Weasley

[Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden]

I've never seen you before so I would say "Welcome to the forum," but it appears you've posted a lot before and done a nice job dumping on the Putinphiles. Please continue doing so. I like your style.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

This guy has to be my new favorite blue avatar!

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

[MasterJedi]

At minimum he needs to leave the forum for 1 year plus a week for every day he hasn’t left since he broke his promise.

[Hindsight was 2020]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

Well vosem and Gmac got banned so mute point lol also we have no idea how many Ukrainian civilians have actually been killed seeing as UN is cut off from the Russian occupied territories and those areas are seeing the worst atrocities happen ala Bucha and Kherson

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

Well vosem and Gmac got banned so mute point lol also we have no idea how many Ukrainian civilians have actually been killed seeing as UN is cut off from the Russian occupied territories and those areas are seeing the worst atrocities happen ala Bucha and Kherson

Well if they got banned simply for supporting Netanyahu, as opposed to specific behavior against the TOS, that shouldn't have happened either.

[Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

This is an explicit blood libel reliant on the fact that 90% of the deaths in Ukraine are off-books in Russian-controlled cities that have been essentially liquidated.

[Rand]

OOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH  YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

This is an explicit blood libel reliant on the fact that 90% of the deaths in Ukraine are off-books in Russian-controlled cities that have been essentially liquidated.

I'm sorry, but the phrase you use refers to an ancient anti-semitic legend that I will not dignify with repeating here. It has nothing to do with my post. To clarify, I don't think there is anything related to Jewishness or being Jewish that is in any way relevant to what I regard as Netanyahu's atrocities. He has committed them as a human being, and would be equally guilty no matter which ethnic or religious groups he belonged to.

[AtorBoltox]

If anyone else is sick of this Russian fanboy cheerleading on a genocidal maniac, sign here

Careful, referring to political actors by their nationality is apparently ban-worthy now

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

Well vosem and Gmac got banned so mute point lol also we have no idea how many Ukrainian civilians have actually been killed seeing as UN is cut off from the Russian occupied territories and those areas are seeing the worst atrocities happen ala Bucha and Kherson

Just to correct the record: General MacArthur is not a Bibi supporter.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

He makes wild threads about Trump, and no one should praise Trump. He is a billionaire and no one is getting any stimulus check under and R administration because Spk Johnson is presiding over the H and believes in giving tax cuts to oil Corporation is better than Stimulus checks.

[Progressive Pessimist]

Were you a lurker?

[Meclazine for Israel]

Were you a lurker?

He is a mysterious conservative arriving shortly after the banning of 3 or 4 conservatives, all with dynamic IP addresses.

We cannot get rid of Woody.

He is our last remaining link to the deep state.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

No, voice of reason, etc.

[President Johnson]

I would support a prisoner exchange with bronz. Now, there I said it.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

I would support a prisoner exchange with bronz SNOWLABRADOR Now, there I said it.

I corrected it

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

If the mods want to help him keep his promise, I see no reason for anyone to object.

I am saying it right now: If either Ossoff or Warnock wins, I'll leave the forum for 1 solid year.

Promise?

Sure. Take a screencap right now.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

I would support a prisoner exchange with bronz SNOWLABRADOR Now, there I said it.

I corrected it

Lets go

[Red Velvet]

PSOL, jaichind, pppolitics, Sir woodbury, it’s interesting that the people who get banned or requested to be so are ALWAYS exactly the ones that don’t make this forum a full echo chamber where people only say boring variations of the same thing.

In some cases, like pppolitics, they were never treated as “problematic” before they happened to vocally disagree with the majority crowd on ONE single issue. It would be much more honest if TOS was updated to include which political stances are allowed to exist instead of people inventing weak reasons to justify getting rid of people they disagree with.

[OSR stands with Israel]

PSOL, jaichind, pppolitics, Sir woodbury, it’s interesting that the people who get banned or requested to be so are ALWAYS exactly the ones that don’t make this forum a full echo chamber where people only say boring variations of the same thing.

In some cases, like pppolitics, they were never treated as “problematic” before they happened to vocally disagree with the majority crowd on ONE single issue. It would be much more honest if TOS was updated to include which political stances are allowed to exist instead of people inventing weak reasons to justify getting rid of people they disagree with.

What about G-Mac, Haley-Ryan and Vosem

[Red Velvet]

PSOL, jaichind, pppolitics, Sir woodbury, it’s interesting that the people who get banned or requested to be so are ALWAYS exactly the ones that don’t make this forum a full echo chamber where people only say boring variations of the same thing.

In some cases, like pppolitics, they were never treated as “problematic” before they happened to vocally disagree with the majority crowd on ONE single issue. It would be much more honest if TOS was updated to include which political stances are allowed to exist instead of people inventing weak reasons to justify getting rid of people they disagree with.

What about G-Mac, Haley-Ryan and Vosem

I only know who Vosem is of those, the others are probably from different boards.

And Vosem is the only person I’ve ever seen openly supporting ethnic extermination, if anything there was a LOW push from both the community and moderation to take action and it only eventually happened late because it was too on-the-face for people to keep pretending to ignore.

Regardless of ideology, there was open violation of TOS and it was not something where people kept trying to find random excuses. If anything, people tried to look PAST it with Vosem actually for a long time because in a more ratched way he does fit somewhat in spirit what the majority here stands for, but it was impossible for people to sustain the level of his openness forever.