2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: California
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 03:03:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: California
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 79
Author Topic: 2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: California  (Read 90951 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,201
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1725 on: November 18, 2021, 12:39:37 PM »

CA-45 loses western Irvine to CA-48 and takes in Yorba Linda on the latest draft. Who might run in CA-45?

Young Kim, esp since she wants to avoid a primary battle with Steel presumably.

And I’d assume Porter would run in 48.
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,485


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1726 on: November 18, 2021, 01:15:49 PM »

Christy Smith lost the current CA-25 by a razor-thin margin. She should be able to win a CA-25 nested within LA County with relative ease. (provided she is main Dem candidate)

She would be an atrocious candidate. You don't make fun of a person's military service.

Quaye Quartey is a veteran, looks like a solid candidate. Dara Stransky also looks solid. Literally anyone besides Smith can pick up this seat.

Yeah, Smith has had two chances and she blew both. I don't see why she deserves a third.

I agree that she's a lousy candidate, but this particular line of argument is problematic in that it would suggest that, among other things, Jim Hagedorn should never have been elected to his current Congressional seat because he failed three times before winning it.
Logged
ChiefFireWaterMike
LordRichard
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,355


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1727 on: November 18, 2021, 01:55:47 PM »

Christy Smith lost the current CA-25 by a razor-thin margin. She should be able to win a CA-25 nested within LA County with relative ease. (provided she is main Dem candidate)
It's only 3 points more D, I strongly doubt she would even win a Biden midterm
3 points more D is enough to make Garcia disfavored even in a Biden midterm.
That presumes the cycle is less than 3 points more R, I imagine.
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,808


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1728 on: November 18, 2021, 02:37:14 PM »

Who runs in CA-45? Perhaps Donald Wagner or Harry Sidhu?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1729 on: November 18, 2021, 03:26:37 PM »

Christy Smith lost the current CA-25 by a razor-thin margin. She should be able to win a CA-25 nested within LA County with relative ease. (provided she is main Dem candidate)
It's only 3 points more D, I strongly doubt she would even win a Biden midterm
3 points more D is enough to make Garcia disfavored even in a Biden midterm.
That presumes the cycle is less than 3 points more R, I imagine.
If we get a R+3 shift, it won't be equal all over the country. It depends on elasticity.
Is northern Los Angeles county more elastic than the nation as a whole? I would presume it would be smaller due to Latino voters being hard to move and the presence of lots of hardline white liberals and conservatives. In general the CA interior  is more driven by turnout differentials than anything else.
So Garcia would need more of an R shift than that, in much the same way a R candidate for a D-held open seat in the MW would need less of one.
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,358
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1730 on: December 03, 2021, 10:50:55 AM »



It's... marginally better than the previous viz? Progress!

Viz 1, 45-7 Biden



Viz 2, 46-6 Biden



https://davesredistricting.org/join/1ec729a6-1868-4d7d-a0c4-16f254943881


Getting closer to the beautiful 49-3!

What is the COI justification for splitting the San Diego East County three ways and denying Republicans even a single seat?
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,991


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1731 on: December 03, 2021, 11:15:09 AM »


What is the COI justification for splitting the San Diego East County three ways and denying Republicans even a single seat?

I guess because the East County as a region...doesn't exist demographically? Empty space with few people. It's currently GOP cause the outlying suburbs east of SD are paired without other areas that are comparatively better for the GOP to the north like Temecula and Escondido. The proposed seat reflects these COI's different, fully shifting it into a seat anchored by the inland cities between OC and SD. Its the carve-up of the East SD suburbs, between the CA-53 successor (which previously also has a bunch of the more D-favoring suburbs) and the CA-50 successor that shifts things towards the democrats.
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,808


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1732 on: December 03, 2021, 12:03:12 PM »

Are Garden Grove and Seal Beach more likely to be in CA-39 or CA-48?
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1733 on: December 06, 2021, 09:05:03 PM »

Anyone know why in the proposed CD map precinct splitting is insane despite the large population deviations? Why would the commissioners go out of their way to make mostly seemingly random precincts in a draft map when their population deviations are often p far off?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,574


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1734 on: December 06, 2021, 09:19:22 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2021, 09:23:18 PM by lfromnj »

Anyone know why in the proposed CD map precinct splitting is insane despite the large population deviations? Why would the commissioners go out of their way to make mostly seemingly random precincts in a draft map when their population deviations are often p far off?

Precincts seem to be nice and square, city lines on the other hand.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1735 on: December 06, 2021, 09:25:09 PM »

Anyone know why in the proposed CD map precinct splitting is insane despite the large population deviations? Why would the commissioners go out of their way to make mostly seemingly random precincts in a draft map when their population deviations are often p far off?

Precincts seem to be nice and square, city lines on the other hand.

But I mean it’s not even like the precinct splits follow any sort of city or obvious road lines in a lot of cases. If you want an example look at the Fresno Clovis part of CA-23 where it borders the new 22. It just seems so random

As you’ve said California precincts are generally nice to work with too, with a few exception of the geographically large mountain precincts next to or in more developed areas, this isn’t a case where precincts splitting is even a must (unlike say Hamilton County Ohio)
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,774


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1736 on: December 09, 2021, 06:41:59 AM »

The new map potentially prevents a Democratic flip by managing the backlash to Young Kim’s homophobia:


Good news for Democrats as her across-the-ballot negative coattails will hurt Republicans across the nation.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1737 on: December 09, 2021, 01:01:47 PM »

Uh I wouldn’t exactly call Kim’s district a GOP vote sink; looks like it only went to Trump by 5 or so. Steele’s looks like Biden + 4ish and Porter like Biden + 14 or smtg
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,358
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1738 on: December 09, 2021, 01:09:39 PM »

Uh I wouldn’t exactly call Kim’s district a GOP vote sink; looks like it only went to Trump by 5 or so. Steele’s looks like Biden + 4ish and Porter like Biden + 14 or smtg

That is a GOP vote sink by Orange County/Young Kim standards. Young Kim currently represents a Biden +10 district where she won by 1.2, and Orange County in general and Northeast OC/Korean-American Southeast LA were both favorable/very favorable to ticket-splitting in 2020, so giving Kim a Trump seat of any kind, let alone a Trump +5 one, is a "sink."
Logged
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,403
United States


P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1739 on: December 09, 2021, 01:36:28 PM »

Uh I wouldn’t exactly call Kim’s district a GOP vote sink; looks like it only went to Trump by 5 or so. Steele’s looks like Biden + 4ish and Porter like Biden + 14 or smtg

That is a GOP vote sink by Orange County/Young Kim standards. Young Kim currently represents a Biden +10 district where she won by 1.2, and Orange County in general and Northeast OC/Korean-American Southeast LA were both favorable/very favorable to ticket-splitting in 2020, so giving Kim a Trump seat of any kind, let alone a Trump +5 one, is a "sink."

Yeah there’s no way that Eastern Orange County + Yorba Linda + Chino Hills district isn’t a R vote sink
Logged
Pedocon Theory is not a theory
CalamityBlue
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 836


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.61

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1740 on: December 09, 2021, 05:41:08 PM »
« Edited: December 09, 2021, 06:01:18 PM by TUN DR. MADHATTER BIN MOHAMAD »

Following the commission today, apparently this is what their current configs look like, roughly:



Did a little rough estimation in DRA and this is what it spit out, very rough because the lines on the stream are awful:
NOCOAST: Biden +11
SAVANAANA: Biden +6
SANTANA: Biden +21
OCSBLA: Biden +2? Ended up with a big surplus so take this with a grain of salt.
BEAVICVAL is incomplete because I didn't get enough of a look at it.




I'd reckon they're getting closer, trying for deviations of 0-1 right now.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,574


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1741 on: December 10, 2021, 02:40:41 AM »
« Edited: December 10, 2021, 02:50:20 AM by lfromnj »

https://davesredistricting.org/maps#viewmap::64d5b36c-00a6-4a3d-900d-ad9b7c2711b4

Seems like one  iteration. Using uniform swing Levin would only have won by 1.2 points in 2020!
Logged
Pedocon Theory is not a theory
CalamityBlue
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 836


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.61

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1742 on: December 10, 2021, 02:48:44 AM »



Mocked up the iterations from today in DRA, take with a massive grain of salt because I'm lazy and most of these are off by quite a bit

Garcia District: Clinton +11 -> Biden +15
Big SB district: Trump +14.5 -> Trump +11.5
Crachkhead Corona-Coachella district: Trump + 6 -> Trump +1.5
Loopy Little Saigon district: Clinton +13 -> Biden +6
Coastal OC district (Steel/Porter): Clinton +7.5 -> Biden +11
East OC pack: Trump +4 -> Biden +2
North SD district (Levin): Clinton +1.3 -> Biden +7.5
Riverside-Imperial district(Ruiz): Clinton +17 -> Biden +15
Issa district: Trump +20 -> Trump +12 (!!)

Left out three SD districts and the rest of the LA metro districts because they're all deep blue.
Logged
Pedocon Theory is not a theory
CalamityBlue
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 836


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.61

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1743 on: December 10, 2021, 02:51:26 AM »

https://davesredistricting.org/maps#viewmap::64d5b36c-00a6-4a3d-900d-ad9b7c2711b4

Seems like the current iteration. Using uniform swing Levin would only have won by 1.2 points in 2020!

I think they uploaded an old version, the line drawing today had a Steel/Porter district from HB to Irvine, checked it out and it hadn't had today's iterations worked up
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1744 on: December 10, 2021, 07:56:13 AM »

That Corona district looks like a child scribbled a blob.

I think they’re trying to create a COI which doesn’t really exist in this case causing that district to kinda become leftovers. SoCal is not an easy place to redistrict but they seriously need to fix that up
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,537
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1745 on: December 10, 2021, 08:31:48 AM »

Are these drafts pre-citizen comment?
Logged
Pedocon Theory is not a theory
CalamityBlue
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 836


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.61

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1746 on: December 10, 2021, 06:00:00 PM »

They published the iterations from yesterday, getting ready to do more socal line drawing today.



I think I got the districts like 99% right-ish, just got lazy with blocks

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/190ZSNlmId7m_mlvGysuN5_kcXNpaOt2N
Logged
Thunder98
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,575
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1747 on: December 10, 2021, 06:15:19 PM »

The SoCal seats are ugly as hell.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1748 on: December 10, 2021, 06:18:55 PM »

BEAVICAL is an abomination.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,574


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1749 on: December 10, 2021, 06:24:12 PM »
« Edited: December 10, 2021, 06:28:44 PM by lfromnj »


Basically Beavical takes in white areas in East Riverside which I think is the Coachella Valley but  SECAL takes in mixed exurbs in central Riverside. However said white areas are famously gay and very Democratic while the exurbs are actually R.

Basically an attempt to boost the hispanic population of SECAL.

Still quite streching a majority minority seat as a Coachella valley seat is way more compact and logical even if it may not fully maximize hispanic %
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 ... 79  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.