Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 08:30:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 155
Author Topic: Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)  (Read 153855 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: February 03, 2020, 01:59:22 PM »



Looking good for Bernie is Keokuk.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,581
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: February 03, 2020, 01:59:48 PM »

Why is there an in-state satellite caucus? Is it just for local people who won't be able to attend tonight? If so, why does this group seem to almost uniquely have this type of allowance?

What, people who work the night shift at meat packing plants should not be able to vote?

These satellite caucuses are an improvement over the previous system and make it a bit fairer (a bit less biased to wealthy old whites who are more likely to be able to caucus on a weekday evening), although IIRC they still give less delegates than the regular caucus.

People working night shift should be able to vote, and they shouldn't have to go through the archaic Iowa caucus system to do it. But everything I've read about this anti-democratic process has led me to believe that such exceptions weren't really an option. Just from a definitional sense, calling an in-state early caucus a satellite caucus is confusing.

Also, not really the point, but it's debatable that this is an improvement over the old system. If these people truly couldn't have participated otherwise (which seems to be the case here) then it does include more people in the process. However, the reason that the virtual caucus was canceled was because people feared it would have pulled attendees away from the actual events and, in the process, weakened their representation when it came to total delegates. Same applies here.

The main reason the virtual cacuses were scrapped was the Iowa Democratic Party could not prove that they were secure from hacking.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,581
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: February 03, 2020, 02:01:29 PM »

Third round of satellite caucusing is starting in Dubuque, Fort Madison, Keokuk, Marshalltown, Waterloo and Glasgow, Scotland.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,299
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: February 03, 2020, 02:03:25 PM »
« Edited: February 03, 2020, 02:09:25 PM by Ses »

[transcription]
Quote
Don_WGEM
@Don_WGEM
Handful of people on hand to satellite caucus in Keokuk. Just talked to a resident from St. Paul and a resident from 3 hours away in northern Iowa. She works in Keokuk and says she wouldn’t have been able to caucus if it wasn’t for this.


Looking good for Bernie is Keokuk.
Logged
Cinemark
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: February 03, 2020, 02:07:41 PM »

I know these satellite caucus probably wont be an accurate representation of the actual results, but I'm currently at the edge of my seat waiting for the results to come out. Ahh, how i've missed election coverage.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,709
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: February 03, 2020, 02:09:19 PM »

Also, not really the point, but it's debatable that this is an improvement over the old system. If these people truly couldn't have participated otherwise (which seems to be the case here) then it does include more people in the process. However, the reason that the virtual caucus was canceled was because people feared it would have pulled attendees away from the actual events and, in the process, weakened their representation when it came to total delegates. Same applies here.

The main reason the virtual cacuses were scrapped was the Iowa Democratic Party could not prove that they were secure from hacking.

I did not know that. Even so, the fact that the virtual caucus was capped at 10% of the delegates no matter the usage/turnout was frequently brought up as an issue. There was definitely discussion around that flaw in the system, even if it wasn't the ultimate reason for the cancellation of the process.
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: February 03, 2020, 02:15:49 PM »

So the Warren supporter didn't realign to Sanders, so is their vote "exhausted"?

I think there isn't viability and non-viability for the satellite and international caucuses, they just get added in to the various other caucus totals (as they don't elect state delegates themselves, and that's what site-by-site viability is for). But I'm not certain on that.

They apparently do have viability and 2nd round realignment, but the Warren supporter declined to re-align.



And this result will be bundled together with other satellite caucus results in IA-02 and it considered as if it was another county in the district.

Not in the district, it will basicaly be like a 100th county statewide.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,581
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: February 03, 2020, 02:17:13 PM »

So the Warren supporter didn't realign to Sanders, so is their vote "exhausted"?

I think there isn't viability and non-viability for the satellite and international caucuses, they just get added in to the various other caucus totals (as they don't elect state delegates themselves, and that's what site-by-site viability is for). But I'm not certain on that.

They apparently do have viability and 2nd round realignment, but the Warren supporter declined to re-align.



And this result will be bundled together with other satellite caucus results in IA-02 and it considered as if it was another county in the district.

Not in the district, it will basicaly be like a 100th county statewide.

That's for the out of state and international satellite caucuses. The in-state caucuses will be assisgned to their respective congressional districts.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,078


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: February 03, 2020, 02:19:01 PM »

It's going to be a Sanders landslide, folks. 2004 all over again. After tonight, we will have a Democratic nominee.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: February 03, 2020, 02:23:01 PM »

It's going to be a Sanders landslide, folks. 2004 all over again. After tonight, we will have a Democratic nominee.

RIP Sanders
Logged
Queen Isuelt
MissScarlett
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 556


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: February 03, 2020, 02:23:50 PM »

It's going to be a Sanders landslide, folks. 2004 all over again. After tonight, we will have a Democratic nominee.

RIP Sanders

RIP America...Roll on USSR!!!
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,202
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: February 03, 2020, 02:25:49 PM »

I’m going to sleep now.

Back up at 3am or so when the first results come in ...
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: February 03, 2020, 02:27:46 PM »

It's going to be a Sanders landslide, folks. 2004 all over again. After tonight, we will have a Democratic nominee.

You should stop talking before you jinx it.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,029


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: February 03, 2020, 02:30:29 PM »



Quote
Because of the small sample size of 9, these three groups were for Sanders, Mayor Pete, and Amy Klobuchar. One man was for Warren, but out of this group, you needed two in support of candidate in order to create a delegate. He said Bernie was his second choice. #Decision2020
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,581
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: February 03, 2020, 02:31:29 PM »



Klobuchar is surging! Watch out for flying combs!
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: February 03, 2020, 02:31:33 PM »

It's going to be a Sanders landslide, folks. 2004 all over again. After tonight, we will have a Democratic nominee.

I hope this broken clock is actually on time this time.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: February 03, 2020, 02:32:42 PM »



Bernie wins Keokuk satellite caucus with over 50%.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,832


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: February 03, 2020, 02:34:58 PM »

First round vote so far:

18 Sanders (75%)
  2 Buttigieg (8%)
  2 Klobuchar (8%)
  2 Warren (8%)

Second round vote:

19 Sanders (83%)
  2 Buttigieg (9%)
  2 Klobuchar (9%)
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,029


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: February 03, 2020, 02:36:00 PM »

Not a single person in these satellite caucuses has been for Biden so far... Could Biden really end up coming in 4th or even 5th?
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,299
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: February 03, 2020, 02:36:06 PM »

[transcription]
Quote
Elaine Godfrey

@elainejgodfrey
Bernie Sanders has won this satellite caucus, with 5 people in his corner.

Klobuchar and Buttigieg each got 2. https://twitter.com/elainejgodfrey/status/1224414174958313479
Quote
Elaine Godfrey

@elainejgodfrey
Replying to @elainejgodfrey
This means that the viability = 15% of 9, which is 1.35, which rounds to 2 people.

So two people are required to make a candidate viable.

24
1:30 PM - Feb 3, 2020

Bernie wins Keokuk satellite caucus with over 50%.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,300
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: February 03, 2020, 02:36:56 PM »

Not a single person in these satellite caucuses has been for Biden so far... Could Biden really end up coming in 4th or even 5th?

Of course he could.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,095


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: February 03, 2020, 02:38:05 PM »

Will there be exit polls that ask about certain issues besides preference?

Like “who is most electable?”

Those were asked in 2016 and were useful
Logged
Diabolical Materialism
SlamDunk
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,662


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: February 03, 2020, 02:39:30 PM »

I don't want to read too much into these super tiny early caucuses, but it is a little bit strange that there hasn't been anyone showing up for Biden yet. It'd be kinda funny if he just absolutely blows out every other caucus and ends up winning >30% lol
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: February 03, 2020, 02:40:29 PM »

Overreactions to initial results... this is the Atlas I know and love. Smiley
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,363


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: February 03, 2020, 02:40:48 PM »

I don't want to read too much into these super tiny early caucuses, but it is a little bit strange that there hasn't been anyone showing up for Biden yet. It'd be kinda funny if he just absolutely blows out every other caucus and ends up winning >30% lol

I mean, it's been a total of <30 people caucusing so far. Remember how often we get weird results in those tiny towns in New Hampshire that vote early?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 155  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.