Who's going to qualify for the Democratic debates?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 04:27:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Who's going to qualify for the Democratic debates?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 52
Poll
Question: How many?
#1
20+
 
#2
19
 
#3
18
 
#4
17
 
#5
16
 
#6
15
 
#7
14
 
#8
13
 
#9
12
 
#10
11
 
#11
10 or fewer
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 160

Author Topic: Who's going to qualify for the Democratic debates?  (Read 77005 times)
Not Me, Us
KhanOfKhans
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,288
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 11, 2019, 10:57:55 AM »


Yang is almost at 65,000.

That's actually pretty wild. Honestly, Yang is ahead of his time. 10 years from now, UBI will be a mainstream Democratic position.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 11, 2019, 11:59:20 AM »

We have a new Monmouth poll, but because of the DNC rule that your three qualifying polls for each candidate must be from different pollsters, and the last Monmouth poll already had a slew of candidates getting 1%, the only change it makes is increasing de Blasio from zero to one qualifying polls in which he's at 1% (again, leaving out people like Brown, who've already ruled out a run):

Biden 4
Harris 4
O’Rourke 4
Sanders 4
Warren 4
Booker 3
Klobuchar 3
———qualification line———
Buttigieg 2
Castro 2
Gabbard 2
Gillibrand 2
Bennet 1
Bullock 1
de Blasio 1
Delaney 1
Hickenlooper 1
Inslee 1
Yang 1
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,266


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 11, 2019, 05:44:39 PM »

Biden, Sanders, Harris, Warren, O’Rourke, Booker, Klobuchar, Castro, Gillibrand and Hickenlooper.
Logged
Former Crackhead Mike Lindell
Randall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,464
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 11, 2019, 05:50:48 PM »

According to his website - Yang has hit 65,000 donors!
Logged
Cold War Liberal
KennedyWannabe99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.53

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 11, 2019, 11:05:16 PM »

I hope Buttigieg gets into the debates. I think he’d be a pretty good debater.
Logged
Spiffy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 394
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: March 12, 2019, 11:43:49 AM »

I hope Buttigieg gets into the debates. I think he’d be a pretty good debater.

Looks like he’s getting close. He raised about $600,000 from 22,000 people after his CNN town hall. That’s not including how many have already donated. We’ll have to see though.
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,243
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: March 12, 2019, 12:32:38 PM »

Do we know how many individual donations the other candidates have at this point? Or do we have to wait under after March 31 to find out how they did in the 1st quarter?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: March 12, 2019, 12:36:30 PM »

Do we know how many individual donations the other candidates have at this point? Or do we have to wait under after March 31 to find out how they did in the 1st quarter?

Even once the quarter ends, I don't think they're obligated to release their total number of unique donors in the public FEC documents.  Just the total $ raised and spent.  The number of unique donors is something that the candidates will release on their own initiative if and when they think it's advantageous to do so.
Logged
Spiffy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 394
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: March 13, 2019, 02:25:55 PM »

Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,293
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: March 13, 2019, 04:12:02 PM »

So Yang and Pete both likely in the debates at this point.

Would be hilarious if they got in but Castro didn't.
Logged
PaperKooper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 827
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.23, S: 5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: March 13, 2019, 06:02:10 PM »

So we have:

Qualified on polling:
Biden
Harris
O’Rourke
Sanders
Warren
Booker
Klobuchar

Qualified on fundraising:
Yang

Current fundraising:
Buttigieg - 85%
Williamson - ~30% as of a week ago

I can't find anything about:
Castro
Gabbard - Twitter fundraising pleas imply she hasn't qualified yet, but it could just be marketing
Gillibrand
Delaney
Hickenlooper
Inslee
Messam
Logged
QAnonKelly
dotard
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: March 14, 2019, 11:09:13 AM »

If the DNC wants to get serious about not having Trump's tax returns, they need to not let anyone on the debate stage until they've released ten years of returns themselves. There's still plenty of time but afaik Warren is the only one who's done it in the capacity of running for president. Some of the others have done it in their other offices' capacity. Put your money where your mouth is.
Logged
NyIndy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498


Political Matrix
E: 0.25, S: -3.15

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: March 14, 2019, 01:06:22 PM »

So we have:

Qualified on polling:
Biden
Harris
O’Rourke
Sanders
Warren
Booker
Klobuchar

Qualified on fundraising:
Yang

Current fundraising:
Buttigieg - 85%
Williamson - ~30% as of a week ago

I can't find anything about:
Castro
Gabbard - Twitter fundraising pleas imply she hasn't qualified yet, but it could just be marketing
Gillibrand
Delaney
Hickenlooper
Inslee
Messam


As for people who haven’t qualified yet, at least Pete, Gillibrand, and Hickenlooper are going to make it imo.
Logged
Reluctant Republican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,040


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: March 14, 2019, 05:52:16 PM »

Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: March 15, 2019, 10:45:33 PM »

I like how Biden is qualified and he still isn't officially running.
Logged
Cold War Liberal
KennedyWannabe99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.53

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: March 15, 2019, 11:24:25 PM »

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS PETE
Logged
Cold War Liberal
KennedyWannabe99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.53

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: March 16, 2019, 09:38:56 AM »

Mayor Pete has apparently reached over 70,000 donors.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,740
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: March 16, 2019, 10:54:11 AM »

They better split it like the 2016 GOP debates.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,643
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: March 16, 2019, 10:59:07 AM »

They better split it like the 2016 GOP debates.

It is, but it's split randomly into 2 groups, rather than frontrunners and separate kid's table.
Logged
Former Crackhead Mike Lindell
Randall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,464
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: March 16, 2019, 11:09:33 AM »

It is, but it's split randomly into 2 groups, rather than frontrunners and separate kid's table.

It's absurd that we likely won't get all the frontrunners on stage together.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,643
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: March 16, 2019, 11:25:39 AM »

It is, but it's split randomly into 2 groups, rather than frontrunners and separate kid's table.

It's absurd that we likely won't get all the frontrunners on stage together.

I like it. I want the longshots to have their chance to be on equal footing with the "frontrunners."
Logged
Cold War Liberal
KennedyWannabe99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.53

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: March 16, 2019, 12:56:02 PM »

It is, but it's split randomly into 2 groups, rather than frontrunners and separate kid's table.

It's absurd that we likely won't get all the frontrunners on stage together.

I like it. I want the longshots to have their chance to be on equal footing with the "frontrunners."
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: March 16, 2019, 06:06:56 PM »

Note that Buttigieg's fundraising counts even though he "only has an exploratory committee".  That's because any $ raised in an exploratory committee can just be rolled over into his "real campaign" once that launches, since exploratory committees *are* regular presidential campaigns with a different name slapped on them.  So the sense in which Buttigieg, Gillibrand, Weld, etc. "haven't really started their campaigns yet" is essentially a semantic fiction.

Also note that it took Buttigieg ~2 months to hit 65,000 donors, and it sounds like Delaney still hasn't hit that number despite having been in the race for years now.  Not sure how much we can extrapolate from that to assess how the other candidates are doing, but it's another indication that if, for example, Seth Moulton really does wait until May to announce his decision on whether to run, he's not going to have enough time to qualify for the June debate.  He presumably won't be able to raise $ that fast, and at the slow rate that we're getting polls (none of which are including Moulton yet) it's highly doubtful that he'll get in on the basis of polling either.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,643
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: March 17, 2019, 12:02:17 AM »

What are the chances that, assuming we don't have 20 qualify through the regular rules, that they waive the rules for current members of Congress to avoid embarrassing them?

Like I don't think they would bend the rules for Williamson, but they would probably give Delaney, Swalwell, or Moulton a spot if they have space for them.
Logged
PaperKooper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 827
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.23, S: 5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: March 17, 2019, 12:20:20 AM »

Qualified on polling:
Biden
Booker
Harris
Klobuchar
O’Rourke
Sanders
Warren

Qualified on fundraising:
Buttigieg
Yang

Has yet to qualify:
Delaney (1 qualifying poll) - Hasn't qualified yet, offering donations to charity for donations
Gabbard (2) - Twitter fundraising pleas imply she hasn't qualified yet, but it could just be marketing
Messam (0) - Definitely hasn't qualified yet (also not verified on twitter)
Williamson (0) - ~30% as of a week ago

I can't find anything about:
Castro (2)
Gillibrand (2)
Hickenlooper (1) - Rased $1M in 48 hours after launch
Inslee (1)

Hasn't formed exploratory committee, can't fundraise yet:
Bennet (1)
de Blasio (1)
Bullock (1)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 52  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 11 queries.