How gerrymandered is your district?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 07:38:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  How gerrymandered is your district?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
Poll
Question: How gerrymandered is your district?
#1
1
 
#2
2
 
#3
3
 
#4
4
 
#5
5
 
#6
6
 
#7
7
 
#8
8
 
#9
9
 
#10
10
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: How gerrymandered is your district?  (Read 24738 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 02, 2005, 08:14:59 PM »
« edited: April 02, 2005, 08:23:56 PM by Jake »

Scale of 1-10, how bad is your district. A map is appreciated, they can be found here.  Explain why.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2005, 08:16:45 PM »

I guess a 7. The GOP tried to make PA 13 into a Republican district and, as Flyers will brag, it backfired. I better be thrown into PA 8 in 2010.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2005, 08:18:15 PM »



8
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2005, 08:20:12 PM »

Logged
MHS2002
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,642


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2005, 08:23:33 PM »

3: The only part that is really gerrymandered is the eastern part of the district by Manassas, Chantilly and McLean.

Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2005, 08:23:46 PM »



In 1998 and 2000, Don Sherwood narrowly defeated Bob Casey's brother Pat Casey for the PA-10 seat.  The old PA-10, I believe, had Wyoming and Lackawanna together.  To eliminate the Democratic majority areas, the GOP cut the city of Scranton off and replaced it with some down state counties and some northern Wilkes-Barre exurbs.  Thus making the district safe for Sherwood, the result, no serious competitors the last two times.

Overall, the map doesn't look like MD-2 or PA-12, so I'd rate it a 5 or 6.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,454


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2005, 09:24:02 PM »



I would say a 4 or 5, contains some Democrtaic areas such as Glen Cove & Long Beach, but cuts out the heavily minority areas of N amityville & northern portions of Copaigue, as it just cuts into the immediate south shore iN SW suffolk
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2005, 09:40:05 PM »

Darby Borough should not be in the same district as North Philadelphia!!!!!!!  5
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2005, 10:41:13 PM »

I gave it a 1.  There is no gerrymandering that I can see, its pretty good.

Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2005, 10:56:55 PM »

3: The only part that is really gerrymandered is the eastern part of the district by Manassas, Chantilly and McLean.



We live in the same congressional district...
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2005, 10:59:15 PM »

I'd say my district is fairly gerrymandered.

Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2005, 11:35:32 PM »
« Edited: April 02, 2005, 11:41:16 PM by King »

I rated it a 2, it would be a 1 but just look how complex the districts around us became (Honda of CA-15 recieved 55% in 2000 but 72% in 2004) in a computerized gerrymander world:

Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2005, 11:45:50 PM »

My district is relatively ungerrymandered. I'd give it a 3.

Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2005, 11:56:59 PM »

My district is relatively ungerrymandered. I'd give it a 3.

I wish you could say the same for NC-12 which connects Winston-Salem to Charlotte.
Logged
MHS2002
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,642


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2005, 12:21:56 AM »

3: The only part that is really gerrymandered is the eastern part of the district by Manassas, Chantilly and McLean.



We live in the same congressional district...

What part do you live in?
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2005, 12:36:47 AM »

I'd give it a 5, maybe a 6.



Not too bad, but very nicely cuts out the bad areas of the county and replaces them with a random part of Rockland.

It's not really gerrymandered in itself (the district actually became more Republican after the last redistricting, despite the fact that there's no chance a Republican will win here until Nita Lowey dies...by which point the district will be very solidly Democrat).  The look is really more the effect of the ridiculous gerrymander of NY-17:


Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2005, 12:42:59 AM »

My district is Michigan 11th I don't know how to post one of those maps.  I would rate it a 5
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2005, 12:52:35 AM »



Maybe a 3
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2005, 01:04:48 AM »




3 or 4
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2005, 01:10:06 AM »

NJ-1 is pretty fair.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 03, 2005, 01:19:06 AM »

Well, my acctual address and where I grew up is in PA-5.  I currently live and go to college in PA-3





I would give them both a three.  It might appear to an outsider as if that were gerrymandered, but they really aren't.  If you knew the layout of the towns in that area, you could see that this is really the only way it could be done.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2005, 01:25:47 AM »


Yay Porterville!
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 03, 2005, 02:18:25 AM »



I live in Mechanicsburg. The district isn't that gerrymandered considering it includes the city of York which is very Democratic...but it's still a safe seat for Republicans.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,811


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2005, 07:10:35 AM »

I'd give it a 5, maybe a 6.



Not too bad, but very nicely cuts out the bad areas of the county and replaces them with a random part of Rockland.

It's not really gerrymandered in itself (the district actually became more Republican after the last redistricting, despite the fact that there's no chance a Republican will win here until Nita Lowey dies...by which point the district will be very solidly Democrat).  The look is really more the effect of the ridiculous gerrymander of NY-17:




Many areas that don't seem too gerrymandered have exactly the problem you note. They are the compact remains of a neighboring district's gerrymander. In that case I would say they are still reasonably gerrymandered.

In NY 18, the electoral power of Lowey made it easy to make the district more Republican. That's still a kind of gerrymander, knowing that a strong candidate can hold a seat even with more potential votes from the other party moved into the district.
Logged
Blerpiez
blerpiez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,017


Political Matrix
E: -0.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2005, 09:28:09 AM »


3.  It's not that good-looking, but there really isn't any need to gerrymander here.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 11 queries.