The Atlas Asylum of absurd/ignorant posts IX

[Ferguson97]

Read the original post I made in the thread . Scarlet greatly cut it up and removed all context

Usually when people say this, the additional context makes them look better, not worse.

[Ferguson97]

Nope , as there is no reason not to trust our legal process unlike with Canada . Canada embarrassed itself on the world stage due to their history of harboring terrorists by letting so many of them go free (They have done this to terrorists who have launched attacks on our soldiers as well with Omar Khadar)

To be clear, you are saying that you trust the Indian legal process more than the Canadian legal process?

[Ferguson97]

Nope , as there is no reason not to trust our legal process unlike with Canada . Canada embarrassed itself on the world stage due to their history of harboring terrorists by letting so many of them go free (They have done this to terrorists who have launched attacks on our soldiers as well with Omar Khadar)

To be clear, you are saying that you trust the Indian legal process more than the Canadian legal process?

Under Trudeau yeah , under Harper no .

You are a clown for believing this.

What has Trudeau fundamentally changed about the legal process?

[Ferguson97]

If these people are citizens, they need to go to jail.  They need to be removed from public high schools, period.  The "From the River to the Sea!" crowd needs to be shown, forcibly, that "We don't do this here!".

Genuinely insane and very fascist.

[Ferguson97]

Nope , as there is no reason not to trust our legal process unlike with Canada . Canada embarrassed itself on the world stage due to their history of harboring terrorists by letting so many of them go free (They have done this to terrorists who have launched attacks on our soldiers as well with Omar Khadar)

To be clear, you are saying that you trust the Indian legal process more than the Canadian legal process?

Under Trudeau yeah , under Harper no .

You are a clown for believing this.

What has Trudeau fundamentally changed about the legal process?

Harper was way more likely to extradite terrorists and even pushed through a law that would remove citizenship of naturalized citizens convicted of terrorism so they could be deported easier for that purpose .

Why do you keep calling the people Modi tried to kill "terrorists" as if it is a universally accepted truth?

[Ferguson97]

Holy sh**t.

Because the whole investigation initially was tied up in domestic political concerns, conducted by partisans, in a highly charged environment where the conduct of BLM and Antifa could be considered flat-out investigation.

The role of outside influence on the writing of the autopsy is an issue that needs to be investigated by those not affiliated with Minnesota politics.  The degree to which this knee-on-neck maneuver was actually a standard maneuver that officers were instructed on in defensive tactics is another issue.  The role of the other police officers on scene, two (2) of whom are imprisoned, is another issue.  And the fact that none of these officers could have received a fair trial in that particular political environment is another factor.

I will say that my main concern is for the other officers imprisoned.  They appear to be scapegoated, and in ways people here would be up in arms with if they were not cops, but ordinary criminal defendants, and especially if they were members of a minority group.  They didn't "kill" George Floyd, and a lawful arrest is a different activity than riding along on a robbery that goes bad and there's gunplay.

It's been a long time since I thought about this issue, but this woman's documentary brings up issues that, quite frankly, no one was willing to listen to in 2020, in part because people were scared of BLM and Antifa.  One thing I DO believe is that two (2) of the police officers in prison in this case should not be there.  Another thing I believe is that it is far worse for an innocent party to be punished, or a partially guilty party to be over-charged and over-punished than it is for a guilty person to walk.  That's a principle I've always had.  There's a reason why it's the PROSECUTION on whom the burden of proof falls.  And no one can convince me that the court proceedings in these cases were not free of intimidation by BLM and Antifa.  We would not tolerate that if it were the KKK in the streets for a trial of a black defendant, and it shouldn't have been tolerated here.

So let's have a new investigation.  Throw open the doors and let the light shine in on the entire process.

If George Floyd was not asphyxiated, Derek Chauvin didn't murder anyone.  Those are legal and medical questions, but they need to be examined and answered, and in full view of the public, in the context of an independent investigation, and not the ones in Minneapolis that were driven by politics and intimidation by the worst sort of political thugs in the streets.

People should watch if they considered the entire George Floyd affair a gross "Rush to Judgement" at best and a deliberate manipulation of evidence and events at worst. 

The same people who are taking the "Nothing To See Here!" posture on this would demand that our full attention be given to a radical left wing outlet producing a documentary with mitigating or exculpatory evidence on, say, Leonard Peltier.  And, in truth, I would pay attention to such a documentary as well.  There ARE innocent people in prison for various reasons.  That prosecutors and Attorneys General of a state may be on the Left does not mean that they never abuse their power or rush to judgement. 

Innocence should always be a defense.  This goes for the other officers on scene for George Floyd who were imprisoned, even moreso than for Chauvin.  I have no idea what the outcome of an objective and honest investigation might be.  But there's no reason an investigation shouldn't happen.  Throw open the doors and let the light shine in on this whole matter, every aspect of it.

[Ferguson97]

Blue avatars are getting way to comfortable being openly racist like this.

George Floyd is not a good person and the lib worship of him is absolutely disgusting. The man never contributed anything positive to society in his 46 years of life. Was Chauvin in the wrong too? Yes, but in an ideal world George Floyd wouldn't exist at all and Chauvin wouldn't be a cop.

[Ferguson97]

Has this guy ever made a good post?

We shouldn't lose sight that this is awful because they don't endorse the campaign in Gaza.

[Ferguson97]

The world didn’t exist 66 million years ago.

[Ferguson97]

I can’t even really make fun of this, it’s just depressing

I think transgender people will be fine under a Trump presidency. You can tell he doesn't mean the transphobic rhetoric (that is actually quite new to him) and it's just words to help him in the primary.
I mean the one major "transphobic" thing he did in office was banning trans people from the military, and honestly who cares about that? All that means is more of us survive lol.

[Ferguson97]

Trump supporters on here want to act like January 6th was a nothing event. Like he didn't order his gang of inbred, drooling morons to attack the Capitol. They equate it with any random ass scandal.

It was a nothing event.

[Ferguson97]

Making terrorist threats to own the libs.

Yes, if other states followed Colorado's lead and these actions alone won the election for Biden, it would absolutely be a justified situation for armed rebellion.

[Ferguson97]

Making terrorist threats to own the libs.

Yes, if other states followed Colorado's lead and these actions alone won the election for Biden, it would absolutely be a justified situation for armed rebellion.

"Makeing terroriſt Threats against His Britannic Majestie to owne ye Tories" - Samuel Johnson on George Washington in 1775, probably.

Lol are you comparing election insurrectionists to Washington and the founding fathers?

[Ferguson97]

No, we're living in the world where detransitioners exist and children are being convinced by a few relatives and the internet that they're transgender because their interests are not a hundred percent stereotypical. Which is something some of us are against. The science still isn't even close to done on this subject either.

[Ferguson97]

Moral of the story: don't throw your kids in the 5th largest river on the continent.

I don't think this is a normal way to respond to a story about a woman and her two children drowning.

[Ferguson97]

Trying to quash dissent is borderline Nazi behavior.

Context is important.

Maybe not explicitly Nazism, but fascism to me is more of a tactic than a coherent ideology. Fascism is an action in motion. Much more than just some twisted ideas in some Prussian's head.

Cool. Deleting a post on an obscure internet forum is still not fascism.

I mean, not to me, because I do believe in freedom of association (which means Virginia, as the rightful owner of the forum, has the ultimate right to ban me - which she has used ), but in general, shutting down speech is a fascist tactic.

Knocking over a TPUSA table on a campus is an example of fascism in action, for example.

College student flipping over a table = fascism

Outgoing President trying to overturn the election he lost = not fascism

Do I have that right?

[Ferguson97]

This is just disturbing.

Yes, I wouldn't be opposed to administering a more painful method of killing to someone who intentionally tortured their victim before killing them.

Rape is generally more mentally traumatic than physically traumatic, so the problem with sentencing a rapist to being raped is that you can't guarantee that they'll be as traumatized by it as the victim was.

[Ferguson97]

He would probably either be closeted, or he would claim that God “cured” him after intense prayer.

If this were my actual life's story, I would hope for the latter choice here.  I know people personally for whom this has happened. 

[Ferguson97]

Antisemitism on the left is virtually non-existent in the West.

[Ferguson97]

No fault divorce is nonsense. It is so extreme that even if there is objective fault like abuse or cheating that no fault is still the easiest method. There is always fault, even if it is both the husband and wife's fault. No fault diminishes the meaning of marriage and makes it an empty and legally meaningless vow. It may as well be "Ill love you until ita no longee convenient for me and then lets divorce".

I can't imagine why the Republican Party is struggling so much with women...

[Ferguson97]

More likely Biden gets under 45% than over 50% with the amount of third party candidates.

[Ferguson97]

Hillary was to Bernie's left on a number of issues!

She objectively was.

[Ferguson97]

The majority of Democrats have no empathy for Laken Riley's family.  They have no empathy for any of the Angel Moms and Angel Dads whose children have died at the hands of illegal aliens.

[Ferguson97]

Prioritizing "Nex" over a girl who was murdered by an illegal. Please run on the trans stuff Joe, it would be great for your electoral prospects. /s

Context: a thread about a bullied trans teen who committed suicide

[Ferguson97]

Cause it's all about Women. The Women in the Democrat Party are all a bunch of crybabies that are running on this idea that women have hard lives cause they are paid a little less so they can give birth to the future, paid more by not taking maternity leave, or become a stay-at-home wife if they find a husband.  And they go for all the air-conditioned jobs that they wouldn't be able to do if not for the F-ing men working the labor-intensive dirty jobs.  Yet, the men who don't have degrees are being asked to pay the student loans of teachers who have the easiest jobs on the planet right behind motherhood. We just have to pretend like someone working 200 days a year should be compensated 70-85k without paying anything into health even though they can get a Summer job or combine income with a husband.  They are given physically intensive and government exemptions on firefighting tests just so Democrats and the media can celebrate the unqualified female. See Kamala Harris for an example of Minority Hire.  How she got promoted all the way up the ladder without being able to speak off-the- cuff cause people found out she's much dumber than we originally thought cause the media have her pass for over a decade.

It's always our fault. All of it is our fault.  Why didn't the Ghost Busters Movie do good?  Cause it looked like it sucked, and you said I wasn't the target audience.  Your Sports Teams fail to get paid; cause women won't watch them.  It's also man's fault that the WNBA is simply unwatchable.  Not until men dressed as women take away those opportunities that Title IV provided them.  What's a Woman?  It's just a biological man not giving a damn about your problems cause that's not her reality.  Women are literally giving away opportunities to men, and then complaining that some men might lie and cheat women out of a job.  Yes.