2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 13, 2024, 07:09:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 170477 times)
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« on: October 01, 2021, 01:24:22 PM »

Cillizza's saying it? Democrats have nothing to be worried about, then! Good news!
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2022, 03:03:46 PM »


It's possible they're waiting for this week's Marquette poll for any (potential) rating changes in WI.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2022, 03:30:27 PM »


It's possible they're waiting for this week's Marquette poll for any (potential) rating changes in WI.

WI is only one rating to the right of where I’d put it (Lean R), and I can see a case for Likely R. NC definitely does not belong two ratings to the left of WI, though.

No, I agree. Personally I'd have it at Lean R as well -- which it might very well be by the end of the week.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2022, 09:50:37 AM »

Not sure why they're wasting that much in VA-07.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2022, 01:18:40 AM »

The ABC/WaPo poll is horrible for Democrats. They did have R+10 in their last poll a few months ago, so I suppose you could say this is a big shift. But Biden at 39% and R+1 in September means that we're still on track for a significant red wave (+30 in House, +2 in Senate).
R +1 is not that far off from the D +2 average sitting on 538 right now — well within the margin of error. Relax a bit, throw it in the average, see what the CBS Battleground tracker says tomorrow…and feel good about the big shift you mentioned.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2022, 04:45:05 PM »

I'm inclined to trust TIPP. Fabulous news.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2022, 09:45:52 AM »

lol. Two great polls for Ds after someone declares them to be collapsing.
We just need someone to freak out the day before the election. I volunteer.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2022, 03:04:56 PM »

As far as the Generic Ballot is concerned Democrats could win the House Popular Vote from anywhere between 1-3 Points and yet still lose the Chamber. Why? There is now a significant amount of evidence of a significant Overvote in Blue Districts and because of that we are seeing a lot of the GCB Tests having Democrats up.
[citation needed]
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2022, 03:43:27 PM »

C'mon, you can't extrapolate from a Referendum and a few tiny Special Elections.
*proceeds to extrapolate from a subsample in a single poll*
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2022, 09:31:23 PM »

Serious “apples to oranges” problem here comparing presidential margins to Senate ones.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2022, 09:42:55 PM »

The more I think about this chart, the worse it gets. Are you comparing an equal number of polls from different polling firms in your averages? Is one of them full of Trafalgar and InsiderAdvantage when it WASN’T in 2016 or 2020? We have basically nothing from Quinnipiac, Siena, or PPP this cycle — if you think those were too Dem-leaning before, then they’ll inevitably have an effect on underestimations.

 This is a ridiculous thing for any reputable site to do.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2022, 09:45:49 PM »

The more I think about this chart, the worse it gets. Are you comparing an equal number of polls from different polling firms in your averages? Is one of them full of Trafalgar and InsiderAdvantage when it WASN’T in 2016 or 2020? We have basically nothing from Quinnipiac, Siena, or PPP this cycle — if you think those were too Dem-leaning before, then they’ll inevitably have an effect on underestimations.

 This is a ridiculous thing for any reputable site to do.
Yes, it would be.
I almost added “but clearly RCP crossed that threshold a while ago.”
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2022, 11:39:53 AM »


Rasmussen's final 2018 poll had Republicans leading by 1.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2022, 11:52:51 AM »

The Civiqs tracker has apparently come online (seems to have been hidden for a while but now it's public), and shows D+4 on the GCB, 49-45.

Similar to what the Morning Consult online tracker has found.

https://civiqs.com/results/vote_house_generic_2022?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true

This is surprising, given how bearish they are on Biden's approval.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2022, 09:38:45 AM »

R+4 is the kind of reasonable outlier you'd expect with a toss-up in the NPV, especially as that lead is coming from a pretty aggressive LV screen. I wouldn't freak out about this just yet -- as has been the case for most of this cycle, we're getting mixed messages here.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2022, 11:22:54 AM »

Do we know what youth turnout by % was for NY-19 and AK-AL?
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2022, 10:51:19 AM »

The Morning Consult tracker reminds me of how the Obama campaign released their internal 2012 polling after the election and it was extremely stable in contrast with the public swings to and against Romney which freaked out his supporters.

While we're on the topic of internal polling: what *is* internal polling anyway and how does it differ from...not-internal polling?

Internal polls are polls sponsored by either a candidate running in the race or an outside group that has endorsed one of the candidates.

Of course, there's a marked difference between public internal polling and private internal polling. Which doesn't actually help answer the question, I realize...
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2022, 11:56:03 AM »

Harris GCB poll shows R+6



This is the same poll from yesterday that had RV tied. Heck of a likely voter screen.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2022, 12:58:17 PM »

FWIW, that’s an improvement for Dems from the last YouGov LV poll, although it’s probably statistical noise.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2022, 01:03:55 PM »

Ah, whoops -- thanks for the correction. For some reason, I thought LV was only used in the CBS poll. My mistake!
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #20 on: October 21, 2022, 10:43:03 AM »

Interesting… perhaps it’s not over after all.

The one thing that's clear is that everything's unclear.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2022, 02:10:31 PM »

Interesting… perhaps it’s not over after all.

Jesus.. the wishcasting is incredibly strong.

There's no legitimate reasoning to suggest a group that has been consistently harder to poll since 2016 is now more readily answering pollsters.

Do you think the pollsters finding Democratic non response are lying or something?
No. They are morons who are bad at their job most likely.
One of them posts on this forum, so you may want to watch that.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #22 on: October 21, 2022, 04:55:06 PM »

I am not soundchaser or Milinnral moderate nervously

I'm equal parts flattered and confused as to how I ended up in this comparison.
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2022, 03:08:24 PM »

What are they going on for Spanberger apart from "vibes, I guess"?
Logged
soundchaser
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,551


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.26

P P P
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2022, 10:56:14 AM »

You know it’s a bad cycle for Democrats when Morning Consult is the best they got.

Is there a pollster you actually think is trustworthy this cycle?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 10 queries.