Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:31:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1
« previous next »
Thread note

Pages: 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 ... 179
Author Topic: Election 2018 Open Thread - Part 1  (Read 209631 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,126
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2225 on: November 07, 2018, 05:02:48 AM »

Florida isn't called yet, but I guess Nelson is done?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2226 on: November 07, 2018, 05:02:53 AM »

Tester is  #populist so he will win garfield county due to a recount but will lose Gallatin due to it being a Romney Clinton county.

LMFAO
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,291
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2227 on: November 07, 2018, 05:04:13 AM »

Florida isn't called yet, but I guess Nelson is done?

There's an automatic recount.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2228 on: November 07, 2018, 05:05:09 AM »
« Edited: November 07, 2018, 05:09:41 AM by Calthrina950 »

Florida isn't called yet, but I guess Nelson is done?

Yes, so far as I know. Nelson trails Scott by ~39,000 votes, with 100% of precincts reporting (per Huffington Post). Unless if a miracle occurs with absentee ballots or the like (as with the automatic recount), Scott has won.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,815


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2229 on: November 07, 2018, 05:07:41 AM »

Florida isn't called yet, but I guess Nelson is done?

Yes, so far as I now. Nelson trails Scott by ~39,000 votes, with 100% of precincts reporting (per Huffington Post). Unless if a miracle occurs with absentee ballots or the like (as with the automatic recount), Scott has won.

I think the 2000 Presidential was down to at most a few thousand at this point. Of course that was after Gore retracted his concession.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2230 on: November 07, 2018, 05:09:02 AM »

Florida isn't called yet, but I guess Nelson is done?

Yes, so far as I now. Nelson trails Scott by ~39,000 votes, with 100% of precincts reporting (per Huffington Post). Unless if a miracle occurs with absentee ballots or the like (as with the automatic recount), Scott has won.

I think the 2000 Presidential was down to at most a few thousand at this point.

You are right. And Bush only won Florida by 537 votes in the end. Scott is leading by much more than that. And DeSantis is up by ~60,000 votes over Gillum.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2231 on: November 07, 2018, 05:44:56 AM »

Pete Sessions when interviewed in a December 2016 by the Dallas Morning News article asking about the significance of his race in 2018 given than Hillary carried it.

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/local-politics/2016/12/12/sessions-culberson-see-districts-turn-blue-presidential-race-age-trump-signal-long-term-trouble

“If the Democrats want to think they can take their party, that is dead, and resurrect something in Texas 32, bring it on,” he said.
The more immediate concern, for Sessions and other incumbents, is the threat of a primary challenger. “I don’t think there’s any doubt in anybody’s mind that, by and large, these races are decided in primaries,” said Sessions.

Ok b****
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2232 on: November 07, 2018, 05:49:17 AM »

Looks like most of the vote came in for Arizona with 99% reporting based on the new york times and McSally is ahead by .8%.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2233 on: November 07, 2018, 05:53:36 AM »

Arizona going to be called soon despite a razor thin margin
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,291
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2234 on: November 07, 2018, 05:54:04 AM »

Looks like most of the vote came in for Arizona with 99% reporting based on the new york times and McSally is ahead by .8%.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html

CNN has the same exact vote numbers, 847,021-832,441 McSally, as NYT. But, CNN says only 75% of the vote in. I'm not sure who's right and who's wrong, but someone is...
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,815


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2235 on: November 07, 2018, 05:56:48 AM »

Looks like most of the vote came in for Arizona with 99% reporting based on the new york times and McSally is ahead by .8%.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html

CNN has the same exact vote numbers, 847,021-832,441 McSally, as NYT. But, CNN says only 75% of the vote in. I'm not sure who's right and who's wrong, but someone is...

CNN is probably counting absentees against the percent reporting.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,291
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2236 on: November 07, 2018, 05:58:35 AM »

Looks like most of the vote came in for Arizona with 99% reporting based on the new york times and McSally is ahead by .8%.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/06/us/elections/results-senate-elections.html

CNN has the same exact vote numbers, 847,021-832,441 McSally, as NYT. But, CNN says only 75% of the vote in. I'm not sure who's right and who's wrong, but someone is...

CNN is probably counting absentees against the percent reporting.

You're probably right.
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2237 on: November 07, 2018, 06:07:22 AM »

There goes Arizona
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,393
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2238 on: November 07, 2018, 06:13:03 AM »

Again, Arizona is too early to call right now. It really depends where those absentees came from.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2239 on: November 07, 2018, 06:28:23 AM »

Yeah, I would say its to early to call as well
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2240 on: November 07, 2018, 06:42:04 AM »

Arizona going to be called soon despite a razor thin margin

What part of "there are 100k+ ballots that they announced BEFORE the election they would not count until more than a week had passed" is not clear?
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2241 on: November 07, 2018, 06:54:02 AM »

Looks like Dems will win the House Popular Vote by around 4% which is not the 6%, 8%, 10% etc figures we were hearing. It it less than 2006 & 2008. So this isn't a wave. This is like only 2% better than 2016.

If Dems had done 3-4% better like it was expected (D+7/8), probably 30-35 more House seats would have been in play & FL/AZ would have been easy wins with perhaps an upset in Texas ! Maybe we would have had a 51-49 GOP Senate even if ND, IN & MO were gone.

4-5% certainly isn't a wave.  What is shocking is Florida went 5% to the right of the National PV.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2242 on: November 07, 2018, 06:55:26 AM »

Looks like Dems will win the House Popular Vote by around 4% which is not the 6%, 8%, 10% etc figures we were hearing. It it less than 2006 & 2008. So this isn't a wave. This is like only 2% better than 2016.

What are you going on? We have a few million votes in California we won't see for many days to come. It would be surprising for Dems to have taken the House with a 4% swing when we were told it needed >5%. 
Logged
mgop
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 811
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2243 on: November 07, 2018, 07:01:56 AM »

5 picks: Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Arizona and 55-45 majority. Great morning.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,237


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2244 on: November 07, 2018, 07:02:09 AM »

Looks like Dems will win the House Popular Vote by around 4% which is not the 6%, 8%, 10% etc figures we were hearing. It it less than 2006 & 2008. So this isn't a wave. This is like only 2% better than 2016.

If Dems had done 3-4% better like it was expected (D+7/8), probably 30-35 more House seats would have been in play & FL/AZ would have been easy wins with perhaps an upset in Texas ! Maybe we would have had a 51-49 GOP Senate even if ND, IN & MO were gone.

4-5% certainly isn't a wave.  What is shocking is Florida went 5% to the right of the National PV.

I'm not sure where you are getting the 4% figure, but if they are up 4% right now, they'll probably be up 7% once all the votes are counted, especially out of CA.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2245 on: November 07, 2018, 07:12:55 AM »

5 picks: Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Arizona and 55-45 majority. Great morning.

MT is projected to go D, and AZ isnt done yet, but yeah, pretty good for you guys.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2246 on: November 07, 2018, 07:14:26 AM »

5 picks: Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Arizona and 55-45 majority. Great morning.

Losing 30+ House seats and getting creamed in the gubernatorial races is great? Be careful not to break your back moving those goalposts.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,126
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2247 on: November 07, 2018, 07:17:30 AM »

Looks like Dems will win the House Popular Vote by around 4% which is not the 6%, 8%, 10% etc figures we were hearing. It it less than 2006 & 2008. So this isn't a wave. This is like only 2% better than 2016.

If Dems had done 3-4% better like it was expected (D+7/8), probably 30-35 more House seats would have been in play & FL/AZ would have been easy wins with perhaps an upset in Texas ! Maybe we would have had a 51-49 GOP Senate even if ND, IN & MO were gone.

4-5% certainly isn't a wave.  What is shocking is Florida went 5% to the right of the National PV.

To a degree yes, but Trump's approvals are relatively high in Florida compared to other key states. As I said earlier, I think he keeps the sunshine state in 2020 regardless of the national outcome (unless there is a 2008 Obama style victory for Democrats).
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,018


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2248 on: November 07, 2018, 07:20:45 AM »

Looks like Dems will win the House Popular Vote by around 4% which is not the 6%, 8%, 10% etc figures we were hearing. It it less than 2006 & 2008. So this isn't a wave. This is like only 2% better than 2016.

If Dems had done 3-4% better like it was expected (D+7/8), probably 30-35 more House seats would have been in play & FL/AZ would have been easy wins with perhaps an upset in Texas ! Maybe we would have had a 51-49 GOP Senate even if ND, IN & MO were gone.

4-5% certainly isn't a wave.  What is shocking is Florida went 5% to the right of the National PV.

To a degree yes, but Trump's approvals are relatively high in Florida compared to other key states. As I said earlier, I think he keeps the sunshine state in 2020 regardless of the national outcome (unless there is a 2008 Obama style victory for Democrats).

Yes, Trump's strength with Florida Man is the mirror of his weakness with educated suburbanites. It's a state that fits him.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2249 on: November 07, 2018, 07:34:29 AM »

5 picks: Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Arizona and 55-45 majority. Great morning.

Losing 30+ House seats and getting creamed in the gubernatorial races is great? Be careful not to break your back moving those goalposts.

Huh.  We still have two out, each way.

The House met Democratic expectations, but did not exceed them.  The Senate exceeded Republican expectations.  Three governorships are up in the air (WI, GA, CN).  One flipped with a lot of GOP support.

BTW: My pick was 229 D.  Smiley
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 ... 179  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 7 queries.