UK General Discussion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 10:22:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 93
Author Topic: UK General Discussion  (Read 266125 times)
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,912


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1275 on: May 17, 2013, 06:16:35 AM »


Scottish football is noticed for it's lack of violence especially at the international level. We also don't have a soccer casuals problems. I lived near Celtic Park for 3 years on the route that fans took to and from the stadium and never saw anything violent during Old Firm games. The incident at the youth cup final, the first time in a year since Celtic and Rangers faced each other in any form and at the Dens was very much the exception. The best way of stopping little sh-ts from ruining games are the fans themselves. There's also a ban on alcohol at stadiums and a street drinking ban has been in force for over a decade.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,276
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1276 on: May 17, 2013, 07:08:22 AM »
« Edited: May 18, 2013, 06:37:38 AM by bore »


Scottish football is noticed for it's lack of violence especially at the international level. We also don't have a soccer casuals problems. I lived near Celtic Park for 3 years on the route that fans took to and from the stadium and never saw anything violent during Old Firm games. The incident at the youth cup final, the first time in a year since Celtic and Rangers faced each other in any form and at the Dens was very much the exception. The best way of stopping little sh-ts from ruining games are the fans themselves. There's also a ban on alcohol at stadiums and a street drinking ban has been in force for over a decade.

It's true that the Tartan Army is generally well behaved and clearly things are better than they were but, especially with the Old (although its really only a one year rivalry) firm, Scottish football has a clear problem. The youth and the Dundee games are not just isolated examples, you've got, for example the UEFA cup final in Manchester as well as charming statistics like these- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-14978841.

With regards to you living on the route to and from Celtic park, are you sure it wasn't due to segregation? Whenever Hibs play Hearts or Celtic the police put up a barricade for half an hour over a part of the exit to the stadium to stop fans meeting.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1277 on: May 17, 2013, 10:09:01 AM »

There's also a ban on alcohol at stadiums and a street drinking ban has been in force for over a decade.
this should tell you everything you need to know about the severity of the problem.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1278 on: May 18, 2013, 04:22:17 PM »

The YouGov polls carried out since the local election results:

Yesterday's: Lab 39 Con 29 UKIP 16 LD 9
Today's: Lab 38 Con 27 UKIP 17 LD 11

These are the highest UKIP scores in YouGov polls.  I suspect we may see a 20% for them in Opinium or Survation's next effort.

... and indeed Opinium have come out with Lab 37 Con 27 UKIP 20 LD 7.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1279 on: May 18, 2013, 10:46:21 PM »
« Edited: May 19, 2013, 12:04:36 AM by Leftbehind »

lol nearly 55% for turbo neoliberalism, and I'm not even sure if I'm right to exclude Labour from it, given they look set to adopt near enough all the coalitions reforms as their own anyway. Has anyone actually exposed some of UKIP's policies, other than the fairly popular anti-EU and immigration well-known ones? Should I expect them to be? Well at least there's a chance we can get PR from this, and it'd be particularly appropriate if delivered by their own incompetency.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,912


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1280 on: May 19, 2013, 05:17:57 AM »

Sunday Times poll suggesting close to 50/50 split for independence if there's an early vote on leaving the EU
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1281 on: May 19, 2013, 06:00:44 AM »

Sunday Times poll suggesting close to 50/50 split for independence if there's an early vote on leaving the EU

More like 55/45, and that's one of the better figures for EU (although a lot could change within a referendum debate: see AV Cheesy).
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1282 on: May 19, 2013, 06:10:55 AM »

Sunday Times poll suggesting close to 50/50 split for independence if there's an early vote on leaving the EU

More like 55/45, and that's one of the better figures for EU (although a lot could change within a referendum debate: see AV Cheesy).

I think he was talking about Scottish independence.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1283 on: May 19, 2013, 06:20:04 AM »
« Edited: May 19, 2013, 06:28:58 AM by Leftbehind »

Well that's what I though, too, but there's no Independence-related question, let alone figures in the Sunday Times tables.

Nevermind, found what he was talking about. YouGov is usually synonymous with Sunday Times, have to say I've never heard of Panelbase?

It'd be hilarious if the Scots voted Independence on the threat that UK were leaving the EU.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1284 on: May 19, 2013, 06:25:36 AM »
« Edited: May 19, 2013, 06:28:04 AM by politicus »

Recent polling shows men are now twice as likely to support Scottish independence.

Professor John Curtice from Strathclyde University:

“Women are less likely to say they feel confident about independence. Saying I want to stand on my own two feet, why do we need the English has potentially something of a macho tone to it.

Testosterone makes a difference here. Men are more willing to be a little gung ho. In so far as independence is a bit of a leap in the dark, they are more willing to take it.”

Sounds like an overly simplistic explanation to me. Is it really that simple?
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1285 on: May 19, 2013, 06:32:58 AM »

John Curtice is usually good for commentary, but yeah that sounds pretty suspect. On a UK level women seem to have less conviction (consistently more d/k's) and default towards conservatism (not necessarily right-wing, just status quo) moreso than men.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,912


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1286 on: May 19, 2013, 08:12:11 AM »

Winning women is the key to winning the independence argument. It's the Yes campaigns 'final push' next year but I'll not talk much more about that. The UKIP thing has been a bonus; Euroskepticism reeks of 'English nationalism' more than just about any other issue and it turns off voters north of the border.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1287 on: May 19, 2013, 08:34:25 AM »

Winning women is the key to winning the independence argument. It's the Yes campaigns 'final push' next year but I'll not talk much more about that.

It was just an observaton of an interesting development, not a question directed to you in particular.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1288 on: May 19, 2013, 09:05:17 AM »
« Edited: May 19, 2013, 09:46:17 AM by You kip if you want to... »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.politicshome.com/uk/story/34889/
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,912


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1289 on: May 19, 2013, 09:42:32 AM »

Winning women is the key to winning the independence argument. It's the Yes campaigns 'final push' next year but I'll not talk much more about that.

It was just an observaton of an interesting development, not a question directed to you in particular.

I know. Surely there's no harm in commenting though? Smiley There's always been a disconnect, even in good polls for us, between the genders. The social aspects of the debate haven't been fully discussed as it's a bit of an economics tit for tat. There's a hope we can focus on that next year.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1290 on: May 19, 2013, 09:56:56 PM »

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2013/05/19/what-focus-groups-say-about-ed-miliband/

Interesting.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,587
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1291 on: May 20, 2013, 01:32:11 PM »

Survation poll: Lab 35 Con 24 UKIP 22 LD 11.

LOL
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1292 on: May 20, 2013, 01:32:13 PM »
« Edited: May 20, 2013, 01:35:13 PM by State Comptroller Atkins »

Survation poll:

Lab - 35%
Con - 24% (-5)
UKIP - 22% (+6)
Lib Dems - 11%

According to Electoral Calculus, UKIP would actually win a seat on this (Camborne and Redruth apparently).... Survation is not the most experienced pollster though.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1293 on: May 20, 2013, 03:00:06 PM »

Survation poll:

Lab - 35%
Con - 24% (-5)
UKIP - 22% (+6)
Lib Dems - 11%

According to Electoral Calculus, UKIP would actually win a seat on this (Camborne and Redruth apparently).... Survation is not the most experienced pollster though.

Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1294 on: May 20, 2013, 03:09:53 PM »

The PM's sent out this email to all members. Christ, he's worried.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1295 on: May 20, 2013, 04:26:24 PM »

Let's Just hope UKIP doesn't follow BC conservative footsteps, and Labour doesn't end up being BC NDP on election night.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,813
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1296 on: May 20, 2013, 04:29:58 PM »

I don't think you understand: the BC NDP copied us.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,912


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1297 on: May 20, 2013, 04:35:27 PM »

Tim Loughton's wrecking amendment was defeated by a majority of 305.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1298 on: May 20, 2013, 05:03:48 PM »
« Edited: May 20, 2013, 05:20:58 PM by afleitch »

Survation poll:

Lab - 35%
Con - 24% (-5)
UKIP - 22% (+6)
Lib Dems - 11%

According to Electoral Calculus, UKIP would actually win a seat on this (Camborne and Redruth apparently).... Survation is not the most experienced pollster though.

Somewhere in England, Nigel Farage is smiling.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,505
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1299 on: May 20, 2013, 05:25:31 PM »

According to the last YouGov poll and the seat Calculator, Labour would have a majority of 116 and the LibDems would be down to the same levels they had after the 1987 Election when they were the SDP-Liberal Alliance.

The following LibDems would lose their seats:

Robert Smith
Alan Reid
Simon Hughes
John Hemming
Alan Beith
David Ward
Sarah Teather
Stephen Williams
Gordon Birtwistle
John Thurso
Julian Huppert
Jenny Willott
Mark Hunter
Duncan Hames
Dan Rogerson
Annette Brooke
Jo Swinson
Stephen Lloyd
Mike Thornton
Michael Crockart
Ming Campbell
Malcolm Bruce
Lynne Featherstone
Danny Alexander
Greg Mulholland
John Leech
Simon Wright
Ian Swales
Lorely Burt
David Heath
Stephen Gilbert
Andrew George
Paul Burstow
Jeremy Browne
Tessa Munt

That would be quite a brutal massacre.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 93  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.095 seconds with 7 queries.