2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 03:57:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread  (Read 233481 times)
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« on: October 26, 2017, 09:06:31 AM »


Doesn't this create at least some level of cognitive dissonance for olds plugged into Fox? They hear Hannity talking for hours about how Trump is doing an A+ fantastic great best job and that Democrats are incompetent, and then are shown a poll showing the apparent opposite.

I guess it feeds into the "congressional Republicans are hamstringing Trump" narrative?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2017, 06:22:17 PM »

Some historical generic ballot data from 1994, 2010, etc. Interesting that Dems had a lead in October 1994.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2017, 03:24:44 PM »

Conflating Trump disapproval with being pro-Democrat is a dangerous mistake.

Huh

Part of what I quoted were separate questions which showed 18-29 year olds preferred Democrats for Congress by a 2:1 margin - same as 2008, more or less. See the quotation box. The approval image was different from that.

Ah, guess I misread your post. But Harvard's new study doesn't have me feeling comfortable.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Granted, millennials are 22-37 at this point, so not quite the same age group you referred to.

Shut up, I'm a millenial. Gen Z is 2000 on. Any other definition of millenial is dogpoop.

The definition of what constitutes a millennial still hasn't really settled, but I've generally heard cutoffs ranging from 1995 to 1998.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2017, 09:55:02 PM »


Safe R. Still good to have insurance in case another Moore-esque situation comes up, though.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2017, 05:20:12 PM »

Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2017, 06:42:04 PM »

PPP has a bunch of (I think) new House polls:

CA-10: Denham trails Generic Democrat 49-41
CA-39: Royce trails Generic Democrat 46-43
CA-45: Walters trails Generic Democrat 45-41
NJ-11: Frelinghuysen trails Generic Democrat 49-40
PA-08: Fitzpatrick trails Generic Democrat 47-41

https://mobile.twitter.com/ppppolls/status/943596029068312576?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Eios%7Ctwgr%5Eother

Holy sh-t, these numbers are apocalyptic. Frelinghuysen down nine? Roskam down ten? Jesus Christ.

Also, someone did the math - these numbers line up with a roughly 16% shift from 2016.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2017, 04:36:17 PM »

Democrats cross 50% in the 538 tracker for the first time: what a glorious Christmas gift!



Hmm. Interesting.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2017, 05:08:15 PM »


I'd bet a thousand dollars they're below 48 by the 10th of January due to Tax Reform Bump.

I'm absolutely willing to take this wager. Pollsters will slow down polling during Christmas/New Year's anyway. Do you have Venmo?

The bet was between me and myself unfortunately.

Interesting. Hmm.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2018, 11:56:30 PM »

I question the Democrats' ability to keep enthusiasm high for another 11 months. I doubt it can remain at the levels immediately post Trump, especially if Mueller clears Trump and Congress passes infrastructure spending.

Now I know what being a Republican in 2010 must've felt like.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2018, 08:59:33 AM »
« Edited: January 05, 2018, 11:51:44 AM by Virginia »

Apparently Republicans have dumped more money against Baldwin than all other Senate Democrats combined? Why?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2018, 05:37:15 PM »

Not looking too hot for the GOP right now on how many seats will they lose in the House:




What market is this?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2018, 06:14:15 PM »

Not looking too hot for the GOP right now on how many seats will they lose in the House:


What market is this?

https://www.predictit.org/Browse/Group/79

85 or more is wildly optimistic (or pessimistic depending on your viewpoint).  I wonder if someone is manipulating that market.

It's been at 85 + since the market was established. I don't think 70+ is unrealistic at all given a combination of factors

Since this is referring to "turnover", does that include retirements?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2018, 06:27:38 PM »

Not looking too hot for the GOP right now on how many seats will they lose in the House:


What market is this?

https://www.predictit.org/Browse/Group/79

85 or more is wildly optimistic (or pessimistic depending on your viewpoint).  I wonder if someone is manipulating that market.

It's been at 85 + since the market was established. I don't think 70+ is unrealistic at all given a combination of factors

Since this is referring to "turnover", does that include retirements?
Yes. Dunno why this is being hyped so much.

Based on the way it's described ("how many seats will they lose in the House") I assumed it was net loss of seats. 

Where does it say that?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2018, 07:38:44 PM »

Shocking how little Senate polling we have so far. Virtually nothing for WV, PA, WI, ND, IN, MT, OH.

Right? Of course PPP came up with a Trump-Cuban matchup in Texas, though.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2018, 03:26:18 PM »

All of the congressional generic ballot polling data per The Roper Center going back to 1963:



Obvious Blue Wave is obvious

Jesus, that post-Watergate reach to 70.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2018, 11:01:03 AM »
« Edited: January 11, 2018, 11:06:17 AM by Doctor Imperialism »

lol

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2018, 12:11:36 PM »


Is this the tax reform bump in action?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2018, 12:54:28 PM »

Yikes. That alone means all Clinton districts in California fall and probably a few surprises too.

Oh man, with a D+17 House PV, we'd be way past talking about Clinton districts. That margin would probably get Democrats awfully close to a veto-proof majority in the chamber. Not that I personally think that result is actually possible, though. This kind of poll does remind me of RCP's 2006/2008 listings - there were tons of polls showing mid-high teens for Democrats, but it eventually settled at a lower margin.

Yeah, if we're talking 17-point margins, we should be looking at that map Griffin made of 120 potentially competitive districts.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2018, 09:38:05 PM »


On a related note, I found out today that Cornregard Southron Buttermilk McGillicuddy XXV is now a lobbyist for Viktor Orban. Wonder who Rubio would've sold out to if Crist beat him - Erdogan?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2018, 02:04:26 PM »
« Edited: January 17, 2018, 02:09:06 PM by Doctor Imperialism »

Jesus, people, it's ten months to the election. Were Republicans crapping themselves in 2010, when Democrats were getting leads in some reputable generic ballot polls as late as September?

We just saw, what, a 30+ point swing in deep Wisconsin? 2018 is going to be good to us.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2018, 03:26:32 PM »

Wow. Republicans only down 47-45 in Minnesota generic ballot. Buh bye, Peterson, MN-1, and Nolan.
https://twitter.com/kkondik/status/954040514155827204

Bad poll after bad poll for Democrats.

I see your New Year's resolution has worn off.  Time to put you back on Ignore.

I'm not sure why "lol I was only pretending to be dumb" justified taking him off ignore in the first place?
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #21 on: January 18, 2018, 03:32:07 PM »

Also, anybody who's still concern trolling with that Minnesota poll after the results in Wisconsin deserves to be laughed at.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #22 on: January 18, 2018, 04:18:31 PM »

Wow. Republicans only down 47-45 in Minnesota generic ballot. Buh bye, Peterson, MN-1, and Nolan.
https://twitter.com/kkondik/status/954040514155827204

Bad poll after bad poll for Democrats.

I see your New Year's resolution has worn off.  Time to put you back on Ignore.

I'm not sure why "lol I was only pretending to be dumb" justified taking him off ignore in the first place?

Because I am not invulnerable to foolishly hoping for the best in people, and having a fool made of me for it

I learned this lesson in November 2016.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #23 on: January 18, 2018, 09:22:17 PM »

Should we split out Generic ballot from all other items into its own thread?

I think that's a good idea.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2018, 01:20:53 PM »

I'd be surprised if Ryan didn't run for re-election, but I don't think it's improbable. The seat would be vulnerable if the two recent Wisconsin specials are anything to go by. The filing deadline in June 1st.

Would be nice to get a high-profile challenger that's not Randy Bryce.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 9 queries.