PiT v Xahar

[The Mikado]

Go.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I think Xahar wins, but a lot of voters go third party.

[MasterJedi]

PiT/PiT landslide.

[DownWithTheLeft]

PiT/PiT landslide.

Yeah, this definitely.  PiT is far from radical and actually just like in Atlasia would be an ideal candidate.  Xahar on the other hand would fire his advisers insisting he and only he knew what was best, grab a lead in the polls, and promptly blow and lose in a landslide

[Hash]

Xahar/PiT.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Policy-wise  PIT, but I like the lil kid a lot.

[dead0man]

PiT/PiT landslide.

[Franzl]

PiT/PiT

sorry Xahar

[Хahar 🤔]

I have a sensible position on unions.

And more importantly, I'm not atheist.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I have a sensible position on unions.

And more importantly, I'm not atheist.

But you're a Muslim.  To Americans, that's just as bad.

[Хahar 🤔]

I have a sensible position on unions.

And more importantly, I'm not atheist.

But you're a Muslim.  To Americans, that's just as bad.

The polls say it isn't.

[MasterJedi]

Unfortunatly for Xahar he's far left, muslim and arrogant which means he'd lose in a landslide.

[Torie]

Bloomberg would win, or someone like that, to wit, a third party. Both candidates are just too exotic, which is kind of sad.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Bloomberg would win, or someone like that, to wit, a third party. Both candidates are just too exotic, which is kind of sad.

     I hold fairly capitalist views, though I don't know if I would describe myself as "exotic."

[Torie]

Bloomberg would win, or someone like that, to wit, a third party. Both candidates are just too exotic, which is kind of sad.

     I hold fairly capitalist views, though I don't know if I would describe myself as "exotic."

As Xahar noted, you are Godless, and admit it. THAT is exotic. I am not sure just how libertarian you are, but to the extent you are, and want to dismantle the social safety net, that is exotic too.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Bloomberg would win, or someone like that, to wit, a third party. Both candidates are just too exotic, which is kind of sad.

     I hold fairly capitalist views, though I don't know if I would describe myself as "exotic."

As Xahar noted, you are Godless, and admit it. THAT is exotic. I am not sure just how libertarian you are, but to the extent you are, and want to dismantle the social safety net, that is exotic too.

     Ah yes, that makes sense.

[phk]

Policy-wise  PIT, but I like the lil kid a lot.

[opebo]

     I ...

...you ... want to dismantle the social safety net...

What 'social safety net'?  We are imagining they are running in the United States are we not?

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. For example if someone is old and they get there house taken away by a flood, then the gov would help them survie during the duration. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. for examlpe if you are a libritarian and the big comanies are going bankrupt then they have to bailthemselfs out instead of the gov. 
do you get it?

[Workers' Friend]

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. They are like Sparta. "if you are not strong enough to survive on your own, it is your fault"
do you get it?

I wish some of the members on the forum were able to understand this statement, sadly, they don't.

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

does it make more sense now? i fixed it. it is hard to describe though. it is complex.

[Workers' Friend]

does it make more sense now? i fixed it. it is hard to describe though. it is complex.

I understood it before, but what I meant was Libertarians are tough to crack.

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

oh, yes.

[dead0man]

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. For example if someone is old and they get there house taken away by a flood, then the gov would help them survie during the duration. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. for examlpe if you are a libritarian and the big comanies are going bankrupt then they have to bailthemselfs out instead of the gov. 
do you get it?

Does this mythological libertarian country ban the Red Cross and other private organizations designed to help people during times of need?  That doesn't sound very libertarian.

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. For example if someone is old and they get there house taken away by a flood, then the gov would help them survie during the duration. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. for examlpe if you are a libritarian and the big comanies are going bankrupt then they have to bailthemselfs out instead of the gov. 
do you get it?

Does this mythological libertarian country ban the Red Cross and other private organizations designed to help people during times of need?  That doesn't sound very libertarian.

Why would it, Libertarians do'nt mind unless it hurts someone directly.