What should U.S. policy towards North Korea be?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 08:42:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  What should U.S. policy towards North Korea be?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Discuss?
#1
Recognize their nuclear program and normalization. Families have been separated for loo long and sanctions don't do any good. It's time to end the Korean war and normalize diplomatic relations, even if North Korea has nuclear weapons.
 
#2
North Korea is an evil regime, but war isn't worth it. Continue to impose sanctions and isolate the Kim regime. He makes big threats but he isn't insane and won't pre-emptively attack. Isolation and containment is the way to go.
 
#3
Kim will never give up his nuclear weapons, so his entire nation needs to be ended now. A pre-emptive military strike on North Korea's nuclear facilities, even if it means possible nuclear war.
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: What should U.S. policy towards North Korea be?  (Read 341 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,037


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 13, 2023, 05:18:07 PM »

Option 1 or 2 for me.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,647
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2023, 06:02:24 PM »

Just option 2. They won't give up their nukes, but don't recognize them. Just ignore them (but keep the sanctions).
Logged
certified hummus supporter 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦
AverageFoodEnthusiast
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,406
Virgin Islands, U.S.


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2023, 09:35:37 PM »
« Edited: November 13, 2023, 09:45:06 PM by FT-02 Senator A.F.E. 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦 »

WI: Ditch the decadent and declining South and forge a permanent alliance with them
Logged
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2023, 09:54:29 PM »

We should try to make them more of a liability than an asset to China -- if the Kim regime is ever deposed it will be at the hands of China, not the United States.

That said, ultimately North Korea is not much of a threat to us.  They are on the other side of the world, we almost certainly have the technology to intercept or disable any nuclear missile they would fire, and their other miscellaneous antagonizing of the United States isn't very impactful (internet hacking, troll farms, counterfeit money, drug production and exportation), chemical and biological weapons for which they don't have any vector.

So any attempt to depose the Kim regime would be either out of humanitarian concerns -- trying to rescue the North Korean people from oppression, torture and misery -- or some rekindling of the Korean War.  We're not going to risk starting a war with China over a humanitarian concern, and American military prowess is an effective enough deterrent that North Korea is unlikely to ever cross the 38th parallel.
Logged
PSOL
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2023, 10:28:21 PM »

Withdraw both the sanctions and the troops out of South Korea
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,756
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2023, 11:40:39 PM »

Resume what Trump started. Mediate another round of peace talks with South Korea in a neutral nation (Singapore would be great) in hopes of reunification. Continue to sanction if North Korea disagrees to the terms of an agreement.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,598
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2023, 08:58:03 AM »

3, if we can get everyone that matters (S.Korea,Japan,PRC,Russia)to agree to it is the clearly best solution for the most people, but that's hard and unlikely for whatever reasons you might want to come up with that support your political biases.

3, if we can get all of our allies to agree to it is the second best option, but it's unlikely for the same reasons as above (though far more likely)

otherwise we'll have to stick with 2, unless the Norks (really Doughboy and his cronies) are willing to play ball
Logged
Old Man Willow
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,706
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2023, 11:41:58 AM »

Option 1. This selective outrage over what oppressive regimes should be tolerated or not is tired and hypocritical. Like Venezuela and 1990s Iraq, the sanctions have contributed far more to the poor living conditions than the dictatorship itself.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,669
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2023, 10:42:30 PM »

Honestly....whatever Trump was doing in 2018 was alright. But he's an unthinking child and Moon (a real statesman) was doing all the real legwork. But obviously 1 and especially 3 (I would prefer the people of Seoul to remain alive) are not options.
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,831
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2023, 11:23:12 PM »

Option 1 while pushing for reunification. In fact, couple 1 with that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 11 queries.