Opinion of the preceding poster's signature

[Joe Republic]

An eco-terrorist implies you have extreme enviromental views and would do things like try and sabotage factories where they are animal testing (something I strongly believe TexasIndy would do).

Unless you would consider it fair for people to strongly believe that you would actually (literally) murder an abortion doctor if you had the chance, then I strongly recommend that you apologize to Texasindy for that accusation.

[YRABNNRM]

Take it some place else please, guys.

[DownWithTheLeft]

An eco-terrorist implies you have extreme enviromental views and would do things like try and sabotage factories where they are animal testing (something I strongly believe TexasIndy would do).

Unless you would consider it fair for people to strongly believe that you would actually (literally) murder an abortion doctor if you had the chance, then I strongly recommend that you apologize to Texasindy for that accusation.

I would murder the doctor but having them to put to death by the state for capitol murder, therefore I was you stated no apology is in order

[Joe Republic]

An eco-terrorist implies you have extreme enviromental views and would do things like try and sabotage factories where they are animal testing (something I strongly believe TexasIndy would do).

Unless you would consider it fair for people to strongly believe that you would actually (literally) murder an abortion doctor if you had the chance, then I strongly recommend that you apologize to Texasindy for that accusation.

I would murder the doctor but having them to put to death by the state for capitol murder, therefore I was you stated no apology is in order

That is not what I said.  You strongly believe that Texasindy would take the law into her own hands by sabotaging a vivisection lab, hence my comparison that puts you in a situation where you could take the law into your own hands and murder an abortion doctor yourself.  Do you think it's fair for me to "strongly believe" you would do that?

[DownWithTheLeft]

An eco-terrorist implies you have extreme enviromental views and would do things like try and sabotage factories where they are animal testing (something I strongly believe TexasIndy would do).

Unless you would consider it fair for people to strongly believe that you would actually (literally) murder an abortion doctor if you had the chance, then I strongly recommend that you apologize to Texasindy for that accusation.

I would murder the doctor but having them to put to death by the state for capitol murder, therefore I was you stated no apology is in order

That is not what I said.  You strongly believe that Texasindy would take the law into her own hands by sabotaging a vivisection lab, hence my comparison that puts you in a situation where you could take the law into your own hands and murder an abortion doctor yourself.  Do you think it's fair for me to "strongly believe" you would do that?

I believe TexasIndy would that, because she would feel it is for the greater good, which is the same reason I might murder an abortion doctor.

[Tetro Kornbluth]

Typical DWTL fare.

[Joe Republic]

I believe TexasIndy would that, because she would feel it is for the greater good, which is the same reason I might murder an abortion doctor.

Holy Christ, that is deeply disturbing.  You'd never have the guts for it, of course, but it's disturbing nonetheless that you'd admit to the idea of it.

[DownWithTheLeft]

I believe TexasIndy would that, because she would feel it is for the greater good, which is the same reason I might murder an abortion doctor.

Holy Christ, that is deeply disturbing.  You'd never have the guts for it, of course, but it's disturbing nonetheless that you'd admit to the idea of it.

Joe, you don't understand what it's like to believe abortion is murder.  I could pose the question to you "If you could kill the serial killer who is about to strike again would you do it?"  I would think your answer is yes and that is the reason I might kill an abortion docotr.  It would be stopping more murder.

[Joe Republic]

I believe TexasIndy would that, because she would feel it is for the greater good, which is the same reason I might murder an abortion doctor.

Holy Christ, that is deeply disturbing.  You'd never have the guts for it, of course, but it's disturbing nonetheless that you'd admit to the idea of it.

Joe, you don't understand what it's like to believe abortion is murder.  I could pose the question to you "If you could kill the serial killer who is about to strike again would you do it?"  I would think your answer is yes and that is the reason I might kill an abortion docotr.  It would be stopping more murder.

Your assumption is wrong, because we have laws in place for a good reason.  Ignoring them and acting on your own subjective judgements is a step closer to anarchy.

[Tetro Kornbluth]

I believe TexasIndy would that, because she would feel it is for the greater good, which is the same reason I might murder an abortion doctor.

Holy Christ, that is deeply disturbing.  You'd never have the guts for it, of course, but it's disturbing nonetheless that you'd admit to the idea of it.

Joe, you don't understand what it's like to believe abortion is murder.  I could pose the question to you "If you could kill the serial killer who is about to strike again would you do it?"  I would think your answer is yes and that is the reason I might kill an abortion docotr.  It would be stopping more murder.

There would just be more Abortion doctors to take his place, and severly the effect the lives of those preganant women who depended on him (If it's a murder than you can't use "they should have been responisible".) - and of course as the saying goes, two wrongs don't make a right.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Gully Foyle has an interesting signature, I do like Woodrow Wilson.  (Btw, Joe is obviously not seeing my logic and this is understandable b/c of our difference in views, so I am going to stop b/c it is going nowhere)

[Tetro Kornbluth]

Gully Foyle has an interesting signature, I do like Woodrow Wilson.  (Btw, Joe is obviously not seeing my logic and this is understandable b/c of our difference in views, so I am going to stop b/c it is going nowhere)

Luckily for you, you don't the person in my sig. If you did you would probably think he was an American-hating wild-eyed radical who should be shot. (Though he was pro-life, in fairness.)

[DownWithTheLeft]

Gully, your right I have no idea who that is, who is it?

[Kevin]

Why the hell are you backing that embarrisment?

[Yates]

Though I am not a fan of Mitt Romney, I would have considered voting for Arlen Specter in 1996.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Why the hell are you backing that embarrisment?

Why the hell do like flip-flopping Romney and RINO Specter?

[Joe Republic]

(Btw, Joe is obviously not seeing my logic and this is understandable b/c of our difference in views, so I am going to stop b/c it is going nowhere)

You're correct on one thing, because I can't see any logic in it whatsoever.  If you cannot properly express or defend your views in debate, then you ought to strongly question why you have them in the first place.

Anyway, that's all I'll say on the subject too.

[Tetro Kornbluth]

Amusing

Gully, your right I have no idea who that is, who is it?

That would be Science Fiction Author Philip K. Dick who died 25 years ago, his work has been made into many films, most recently A Scanner Darkly.

[Kevin]

Why the hell are you backing that embarrisment?

Why the hell do like flip-flopping Romney and RINO Specter?

Because they are better then Hitler 2!

[DownWithTheLeft]

Why the hell are you backing that embarrisment?

Why the hell do like flip-flopping Romney and RINO Specter?

Because they are better then Hitler 2!

Tancredo is not Hitler.  This is what I mean about why this forum is incredibly bias.  Calling Tancredo Hitler gets you praise, calling someone an eco-terrorist is just awful.

Anyway, at least you know where Tancredo stands.  Romney might decide that today he's going to become a Nazi b/c he heard it might get him so votes.

[Joe Republic]

Tancredo is not Hitler.  This is what I mean about why this forum is incredibly bias.  Calling Tancredo Hitler gets you praise, calling someone an eco-terrorist is just awful.

Who praised Kevin for calling him Hitler?  Yours was the first response to it.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Tancredo is not Hitler.  This is what I mean about why this forum is incredibly bias.  Calling Tancredo Hitler gets you praise, calling someone an eco-terrorist is just awful.

Who praised Kevin for calling him Hitler?  Yours was the first response to it.

You can't honestly tell me that's never been said before on the forum only to be met with more posts backing it up

[Joe Republic]

Show me.

[Gabu]

Tancredo is not Hitler.  This is what I mean about why this forum is incredibly bias.  Calling Tancredo Hitler gets you praise, calling someone an eco-terrorist is just awful.

Who praised Kevin for calling him Hitler?  Yours was the first response to it.

You can't honestly tell me that's never been said before on the forum only to be met with more posts backing it up

I just did a search for "tancredo hitler" and I came up with all of two posts that were not Kevin's, none of which even compared Tancredo to Hitler, let alone giving praise to someone who had done so.

[DownWithTheLeft]

Tancredo is not Hitler.  This is what I mean about why this forum is incredibly bias.  Calling Tancredo Hitler gets you praise, calling someone an eco-terrorist is just awful.

Who praised Kevin for calling him Hitler?  Yours was the first response to it.

You can't honestly tell me that's never been said before on the forum only to be met with more posts backing it up

I just did a search for "tancredo hitler" and I came up with all of two posts that were not Kevin's, none of which even compared Tancredo to Hitler, let alone giving praise to someone who had done so.

Search the "racist" "Tancredo" I bet a lot come up, or "nutjob" "Tancredo"