California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 04:20:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64
Author Topic: California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)  (Read 66792 times)
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1550 on: March 11, 2024, 11:13:42 AM »

So what's up with Santa Clara county? Why would Schiff's vote share be 60% lower in the Special compared to the Full term? That seems like a pretty drastic difference.

Probably a tabulation error.
A pretty blatant tabulation error going on for days without being corrected would be quite embarassing.

What? California is awful at running elections? Who could ever guess such a thing?
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,618


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1551 on: March 11, 2024, 11:28:01 AM »

Per CA SoS Website Schiffs' lead for the Full Term has been cut to about 29,000

https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-senate

Unless L.A. County has some giant basket of Schiff Vote out there is a reasonable chance Garvey not only beats Schiff in the Special Primary but also in the Regular Open Primary.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1552 on: March 11, 2024, 11:48:31 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)

Not much update today since it was the weekend; should get bigger updates again starting back tonight
Logged
Agafin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 911
Cameroon


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1553 on: March 11, 2024, 12:31:51 PM »

Per CA SoS Website Schiffs' lead for the Full Term has been cut to about 29,000

https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-senate

Unless L.A. County has some giant basket of Schiff Vote out there is a reasonable chance Garvey not only beats Schiff in the Special Primary but also in the Regular Open Primary.

Hmmm this is interesting, so the late vote is bluer but more anti-Schiff? 
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1554 on: March 11, 2024, 12:42:21 PM »

Per CA SoS Website Schiffs' lead for the Full Term has been cut to about 29,000

https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-senate

Unless L.A. County has some giant basket of Schiff Vote out there is a reasonable chance Garvey not only beats Schiff in the Special Primary but also in the Regular Open Primary.

Hmmm this is interesting, so the late vote is bluer but more anti-Schiff? 

Yeah the later vote has definitely been a bit more pro-Porter and pro-Lee
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,872


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1555 on: March 11, 2024, 01:26:09 PM »

Per CA SoS Website Schiffs' lead for the Full Term has been cut to about 29,000

https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-senate

Unless L.A. County has some giant basket of Schiff Vote out there is a reasonable chance Garvey not only beats Schiff in the Special Primary but also in the Regular Open Primary.

Hmmm this is interesting, so the late vote is bluer but more anti-Schiff? 

The late vote should be roughly equal or slightly redder than the statewide margin. That's what it was like 2022. It seems like counting is going even slower now though.

Overall, Schiff should continue dropping and Garvey will probably stay put. Porter and Lee will continue to rise because late ballots are younger and less establishment than earlier ballots.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1556 on: March 12, 2024, 08:35:12 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)
76% in: D+20.0 (59.2-39.2)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)

Blue shift continues as of now.
Logged
Unbeatable Titan Susan Collins
johnzaharoff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1557 on: March 12, 2024, 11:09:49 PM »

Garvey is now in 1st place
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1558 on: March 12, 2024, 11:17:24 PM »


Hot damn. Since the top two system was instituted, has there ever been a statewide election where a Republican placed first?
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,872


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1559 on: March 12, 2024, 11:24:43 PM »


Hot damn. Since the top two system was instituted, has there ever been a statewide election where a Republican placed first?

Lanhee Chen received 37% in the primary as the sole R candidate for state controller in 2022. He got 44% in the general, so he's the high water mark for the CA GOP as of late (excluding Poizner since he was an independent and the election was less polarized).
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,618


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1560 on: March 13, 2024, 12:36:58 AM »


Hot damn. Since the top two system was instituted, has there ever been a statewide election where a Republican placed first?
Since the Top 2 Primary System was implemented a Republican Candidate either running for Senate or Governor has never finished at the Top.

Lanhee Chen finished first in a Race for State Controller in 2022.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1561 on: March 13, 2024, 08:16:19 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)
76% in: D+20.0 (59.2-39.2)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
85% in: D+19.5 (59.0-39.5)  / special: D+20.4 (60.2-39.8 )

And we're back to a small red shift!
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,122


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1562 on: March 13, 2024, 12:09:34 PM »

It was the right strategic thing to do and Schiff is going to be the next senator  from CA but you have to wonder if deep down Schiff wishes he had spent a few million less boosting the campaign of Garvey. Better safe than sorry I guess.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,872


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1563 on: March 13, 2024, 12:28:20 PM »

It was the right strategic thing to do and Schiff is going to be the next senator  from CA but you have to wonder if deep down Schiff wishes he had spent a few million less boosting the campaign of Garvey. Better safe than sorry I guess.

Schiff ought to be satisfied. His performance was more of a surprise than Garvey's. I don't think many people though he would be getting 55% of the Democratic vote. His spending, both to boost himself and boost Garvey over Porter by so much, gave him a clear mandate to be the next senator. Having such a stark result is good for unity and quiets the left-wing.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,386
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1564 on: March 13, 2024, 01:18:34 PM »

It was the right strategic thing to do and Schiff is going to be the next senator  from CA but you have to wonder if deep down Schiff wishes he had spent a few million less boosting the campaign of Garvey. Better safe than sorry I guess.

No he didn't Porter split the D vote that's why Schiff didn't do that well more people took D not R ballots in CA

White females voted overwhelming for Katie Porter, I knew that a vote for Porter would be a vote for Garvey so I didn't vote for Porter, her career is over, it's irony that she was the heavy fav to win the seat after Feinstein died and went to 3rd place. She embarrassed herself
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,812


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1565 on: March 14, 2024, 01:38:39 AM »


Hot damn. Since the top two system was instituted, has there ever been a statewide election where a Republican placed first?

The 2014 Controller election almost had the Republicans shut out the Democrats. They ended up with 1st and 4th place. The 4th place candidate was only 0.7 points behind 2nd place.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,386
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1566 on: March 14, 2024, 01:56:54 AM »

It doesn't matter Porter split the vote with Schiff, Schiff is gonna win 5/7 pts with Porter voters
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1567 on: March 14, 2024, 08:10:59 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)
76% in: D+20.0 (59.2-39.2)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
85% in: D+19.5 (59.0-39.5)  / special: D+20.4 (60.2-39.8 )
89% in: D+20.6 (59.5-38.9)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)

Back to a blue shift.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,386
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1568 on: March 14, 2024, 08:53:04 AM »

The narrative is that Garvey win but he only won as I stated before, on a split vote
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1569 on: March 15, 2024, 08:38:22 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)
76% in: D+20.0 (59.2-39.2)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
85% in: D+19.5 (59.0-39.5)  / special: D+20.4 (60.2-39.8 )
89% in: D+20.6 (59.5-38.9)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
92% in: D+20.2 (59.3-39.1)  / special: D+21.0 (60.5-39.5)

Red shift in regular, but blue shift in special.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,618


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1570 on: March 15, 2024, 02:38:05 PM »

Little under 15,000 seperate Schiff and Garvey now.

CNN has finally caught up with the Vote Count and is showing the same figures as the CA SoS Webpage

https://edition.cnn.com/election/2024/primaries-and-caucuses/results/california
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,114
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1571 on: March 15, 2024, 02:42:50 PM »
« Edited: March 15, 2024, 03:49:13 PM by President Johnson »

Did Porter and Lee concede already or congretulate Schiff? I couldn't find anything.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1572 on: March 16, 2024, 08:14:49 AM »

Did Porter and Lee concede already or congretulate Schiff? I couldn't find anything.

Not sure if they did publicly (which is weird) but Schiff confirmed in one of his interviews last week that they did reach out to him privately
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,508


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1573 on: March 16, 2024, 08:18:02 AM »

47% in: D+16.3 (57.3-41.0)
53% in: D+16.7 (57.5-40.8 )
58% in: D+17.5 (57.9-40.4)
68% in: D+19.1 (58.7-39.6)
72% in: D+19.0 (58.7-39.7)  / special: D+19.6 (59.8-40.2)
73% in: D+19.2 (58.8-39.6)  / special: D+19.8 (59.9-40.1)
76% in: D+20.0 (59.2-39.2)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
85% in: D+19.5 (59.0-39.5)  / special: D+20.4 (60.2-39.8 )
89% in: D+20.6 (59.5-38.9)  / special: D+20.8 (60.4-39.6)
92% in: D+20.2 (59.3-39.1)  / special: D+21.0 (60.5-39.5)
>95% in: D+20.4 (59.4-39.0)  / special: D+21.0 (60.5-39.5)

Still a little left to count, but looks like we ended up with about a ~4% blue shift from election night, and while there were a few minor backslides, it was generally a blue shift throughout (7 days got bluer, only 3 days got redder)
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,811
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1574 on: March 16, 2024, 08:34:48 AM »

Did Porter and Lee concede already or congretulate Schiff? I couldn't find anything.

Not sure if they did publicly (which is weird) but Schiff confirmed in one of his interviews last week that they did reach out to him privately

Lee did publicly on Election Night (but only to Schiff, not to Garvey), Porter hasn't afaik.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 12 queries.