Democrats poised for election gains
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 04:54:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Democrats poised for election gains
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What you want/what will happen (in terms of the Dems.
#1
Win H.o.R./Nothing
 
#2
Win Senate/Nothing
 
#3
Win H.o.R./Win H.o.R.
 
#4
Win Senate/Win Senate
 
#5
Win Wenate/Win H.o.R.
 
#6
Win H.o.R./Win Senate
 
#7
Win Both/Nothing
 
#8
Win Both/Win H.o.R.
 
#9
Win Both/ Win Senate
 
#10
Win Both/Win Both
 
#11
Win H.o.R./Win Both
 
#12
Win Senate/Win Both
 
#13
Nothing/Win Senate
 
#14
Nothing/Win H.o.R.
 
#15
Nothing/Win Both
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: Democrats poised for election gains  (Read 1134 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 05, 2006, 10:54:34 PM »
« edited: November 06, 2006, 12:37:52 PM by Inks.LWC »

Nothing/Win H.o.R.
Democrats poised for election gains
Posted 11/5/2006 12:05 PM ET E-mail | Save | Print | Subscribe to stories like this   
 
 
By Charlie Riedel, AP
 
Missouri Senate candidate Claire McCaskill addresses first responders during a campaign stop in St. Louis Saturday. The stop was the last of 32 made in 24 hours.

By David Espo, The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Long locked out of power, Democrats appear poised to win control of the House and possibly the Senate in congressional elections Tuesday amid a national clamor for change after four years of war in Iraq.
Democrats also are on track to replace Republican governors in several states, New York, Ohio and Massachusetts among them. Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger seems safely on his way to a first full term in California, the most populous state.

Six years after Republican President George W. Bush took office, his poll ratings are no better than 40%. The Republicans have a majority in Congress, but Democrats are just 15 seats short in the House and six short in the Senate. A Democratic Congress would likely slow down Bush's agenda.

All 435 House seats are on the ballot Tuesday, as well as 33 of the 100 Senate seat and 36 gubernatorial races. Voters in 37 states will determine the fate of ballot initiatives, deciding whether to raise the minimum wage, ban gay marriage, endorse expanded embryonic stem cell research and — in South Dakota — impose the country's most stringent abortion restrictions.

State legislative and local races by the thousands filled out the ballots in nearly every county.

The elections counted as the costliest ever, with spending expected to reach $2.6 billion (euro2 billion), much of it paying for caustic television commercials.

Candidates everywhere worked through a final weekend of campaigning, sometimes with little or no rest. Claire McCaskill, the Democratic senatorial candidate in Missouri, was on a 30-stop tour over 24 uninterrupted hours. "It's the last person you expect to see at Waffle House at 3 a.m.," said Tim Yazawa, 24, who was grabbing a middle-of-the night bite to eat when her entourage rolled in.

Republicans are counting on their get-out-the-vote operation and a late save-the-majority tour by Bush to limit their losses. "The last thing American families and small businesses need now is a higher tax bill," he said Saturday in a weekly radio address broadcast live from Englewood, Colorado. "And that is what you'll get if the Democrats take control of the Congress."

But Democrats sought to capitalize on weariness about the war, which has cost more than 2,800 U.S. troops their lives.

A dozen years after Republicans gained power of Congress in a landslide, strategists in both parties as well as public and private polls say Democrats are on the cusp of taking it back.

Democrats must gain 15 seats to make Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi of California the first woman speaker in history, and national surveys showed Democrats running ahead of Republicans in hypothetical ballot tests on a scope not seen since 1990. In a late October Associated Press-AOL News poll, 56% of likely voters sided with Democrats and 37% with Republicans. The 19 percentage-point gap was nearly double the 10-point spread in a survey a few weeks earlier.

At the same time, the poll suggested that not everyone's mind was fully made up — far from it. About 38% of likely voters said they either had not made a final decision or could change their intentions before casting their ballots.

Still, among Republicans and Democrats alike, there was open speculation about the size of the majority the Democrats would command.

"A miracle day for us would be 14 seats lost," said Joe Gaylord, who was the chief strategist for Newt Gingrich in 1994 when Republicans swept to power. "A good day would be around minus 20, and a bad day would be over 30."

He said dissatisfaction was evident with the Republican job performance among all parts of the party's coalition, social conservatives, economic conservatives and foreign policy conservatives.

Democrats shunned ebullient predictions, recalling false optimism of previous elections. But several strategists said this time was different. In the past, "we were trying to contrive a message of change, and so we would lose. This time, the political environment held from January through November," said John Anzalone, a Democratic pollster advising Sheldon Whitehouse, favored to win a Senate race in Rhode Island, as well as numerous House contenders in close races.

"I've said all along there's going to be three dozen very hotly contested seats," said Congressman Tom Reynolds, the Republican chairman of the House campaign committee, who noted that he has said for months that Republicans have campaigned all year with "the wind in our face."

Based on polling and the record sums the House Republican committee and its Democratic counterpart have spent on advertising, the list of competitive races far exceeds three dozen.

A string of states stretching from Connecticut through New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky holds roughly 20 competitive races. All were in Republican hands, a blend of open seats and incumbents in trouble. Reynolds, of New York, as well as Congresswoman Deborah Pryce of Ohio, also a member of the leadership, were among them.

Seats held by Republican Congressmen Michael Fitzpatrick, Curt Weldon, Jim Gerlach and Don Sherwood in eastern Pennsylvania were so fiercely fought that the two party committees spent more than $18 million (euro14 million) combined to prevail.

Republican Congresswoman Heather Wilson is in her usual tight race for a new term in New Mexico, but other Republicans, such as Congressmen Charles Bass of New Hampshire, Jim Walsh of New York and Steve Chabot of Ohio are struggling for the first time in years.

Democrats also sensed late opportunity to pick up House seats in Kansas, Colorado and even conservative Nebraska, and Bush arranged his late campaign itinerary to be in all three states.

Three days before the ballots are cast, Republicans all but conceded six seats or more are lost to the Democrats.

By contrast, the list of Democrats who appeared in electoral jeopardy to Republican challengers was short — Congressmen Jim Marshall and John Barrow in Georgia. Both are in districts that were redrawn by the Republican legislature to make them more hospitable to the Republican Party.

The struggle for the Senate, where Democrats need to gain six seats for control, seemed less predictable. "I'm both feeling good and nervous," said Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, head of the Democratic campaign organization. "I wouldn't say we're going to take back the Senate and I wouldn't say we're not."

Democrats said they would defeat Republican Senators Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania, Mike DeWine in Ohio and Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island, and Republicans made little attempt to dispute them.

In the campaign's final days, the pivotal races were re-election campaigns by Republican Senators George Allen in Virginia, Conrad Burns in Montana, Jim Talent in Missouri and the Tennessee seat that Majority Leader Bill Frist is leaving to run for president.

In some respects, Burns and Allen held the key for Republicans, one a three-term incumbent hoping to fashion a come-from-behind victory, the other struggling to survive after a bedraggled, error-prone campaign.

The polls made Talent's race against McCaskill the closest in the country, and Bush made two stops in Missouri in the campaign's final days in hopes of saving the seat.

In Tennessee, late polls made former Chattanooga Mayor Bob Corker the mild favorite to defeat Congressman Harold Ford Jr., a Democrat who is seeking to become the first black elected to the Senate from a southern state in more than a century.
Logged
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2006, 01:48:56 AM »

Win Wennate?  Wow.

(Sight hijack here...)

If you're going to cut and paste an article, could you at least edit out the filler rather than forcing us to read through all the irrelevant link buttons (I count at least 20 lines of junk.  It's not that hard to do a highlight and delete, really).

And while you're at it, a link back to the original would be appriciated.

(end hijack).

I hope to get both chambers, but am only cautiously optimistic about the house.

The senate will probably get closer, and taking it is within the realm of posibility if we have a really good night.  If.

We will se in about 48 hours.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2006, 12:37:22 PM »

Win Wennate?  Wow.

(Sight hijack here...)

If you're going to cut and paste an article, could you at least edit out the filler rather than forcing us to read through all the irrelevant link buttons (I count at least 20 lines of junk.  It's not that hard to do a highlight and delete, really).

And while you're at it, a link back to the original would be appriciated.

(end hijack).

I hope to get both chambers, but am only cautiously optimistic about the house.

The senate will probably get closer, and taking it is within the realm of posibility if we have a really good night.  If.

We will se in about 48 hours.

I normally edit out the crap--I must've missed it.  Any article is USAToday, searchable under the subject I put unless otherwise noted.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2006, 02:44:47 AM »

The question of who's going to get control of the House is over.

Going by the polls, it's over for the Senate too, but I wouldn't bet on it, knowing Diebold and all.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2006, 02:46:55 AM »

Going by the polls, it's over for the Senate too

Why?  The polls have numerous races way too close to call.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2006, 02:50:12 AM »

Why?  The polls have numerous races way too close to call.

The only one that was close that now has the Pubbies winning is Bob Dorker (considering how the media hates Harold Ford's guts). From the newest polls I've seen, Alfred E. Allen and Jim No-Talent are toast.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2006, 03:20:49 AM »

Why?  The polls have numerous races way too close to call.

The only one that was close that now has the Pubbies winning is Bob Dorker (considering how the media hates Harold Ford's guts). From the newest polls I've seen, Alfred E. Allen and Jim No-Talent are toast.

Newest does not necessarily mean best.  Look who they are coming from.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2006, 11:22:15 AM »

Newest does not necessarily mean best.  Look who they are coming from.

A lot of them are from SurveyUSA. SurveyUSA is so strongly favorable to Republicans that they sent out a press release declaring Ernie Fletcher had won days before the election.

If SurveyUSA says a Pubbie is losing by 5 or 6 points, they're probably losing by 7 or 8.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,125
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2006, 11:43:19 AM »

LOL.  Have you even seen any of SUSA's election polls lately?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2006, 01:37:22 PM »

Newest does not necessarily mean best.  Look who they are coming from.

A lot of them are from SurveyUSA. SurveyUSA is so strongly favorable to Republicans that they sent out a press release declaring Ernie Fletcher had won days before the election.

If SurveyUSA says a Pubbie is losing by 5 or 6 points, they're probably losing by 7 or 8.

SurveyUSA seems strongly pro-Democrat this year in a lot of places.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2006, 02:17:32 PM »



My "hope" is that the democrats don't pick up any seats, but rather lose seats (but that's because I cannot stand the current Democratic party).  However, with that not being the case, I'd go with the Democrats winning enough house seats to pick up the majority by one seat, with the Republicans maintaining the Senate.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2006, 02:24:57 PM »

SurveyUSA seems strongly pro-Democrat this year in a lot of places.

In 1994 the polls were way off, but now pollsters know how to take election shenanigans into account. Every time I see a party breakdown, the pollsters have always polled more Republicans than Democrats, even in areas that have more Democrats.

I actually thought the Democrats would gain seats in 1994, based on the polls, but the polls didn't take a lot of things into account then that they do now (such as Republicans cheating).
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2006, 02:54:21 PM »

SurveyUSA seems strongly pro-Democrat this year in a lot of places.

In 1994 the polls were way off, but now pollsters know how to take election shenanigans into account. Every time I see a party breakdown, the pollsters have always polled more Republicans than Democrats, even in areas that have more Democrats.

I actually thought the Democrats would gain seats in 1994, based on the polls, but the polls didn't take a lot of things into account then that they do now (such as Republicans cheating).

Snicker.

Somebody call Time...there appears to be a drug problem in New America.

An expose should result.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2006, 02:54:53 PM »

SurveyUSA seems strongly pro-Democrat this year in a lot of places.

In 1994 the polls were way off, but now pollsters know how to take election shenanigans into account. Every time I see a party breakdown, the pollsters have always polled more Republicans than Democrats, even in areas that have more Democrats.

I actually thought the Democrats would gain seats in 1994, based on the polls, but the polls didn't take a lot of things into account then that they do now (such as Republicans cheating).

Can you give an example or two of the partisan polling issues?

It's not that I disagree with you that the polling could be wrong.  It's that it usually isn't.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,959


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2006, 03:00:41 PM »

Can you give an example or two of the partisan polling issues?

There was one poll for Iowa that polled more Republicans than Democrats.

Iowa???

That was one of Dukakis's best states, so you know there's more Democrats there.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2006, 04:00:06 PM »

I forgot Nothing/Nothing.  But i doubt anybody actually believes this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.