2022 Primary Election Night Coverage Megathread (9/13 - GRAND FINALE - DE, NH, RI)

[Huey Long is a Republican]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

[Shaula🏳️‍⚧️]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Exactly. These "muh Republican women" people don't even care about women, they just care about 'elooctability', like Stefanik. I support GOP women. I support Kari Lake, MTG, Laura Loomer, Sarah Palin and Janice McGeachin, but you never see the "muh GOP women" people promote those GOP women.

[Huey Long is a Republican]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Exactly. These "muh Republican women" people don't even care about women, they just care about 'elooctability', like Stefanik. I support GOP women. I support Kari Lake, MTG, Laura Loomer, Sarah Palin and Janice McGeachin, but you never see the "muh GOP women" people promote those GOP women.

Because they're unelectooble. This is despite the horrendous policies that 'Republican' women like Noem, Stefanik, Spartz, Haley, Britt, and Capito push. I'd rather lose 67% of winnable races if it means that the other 33% sees the Right people win. I won't let the establishment hijack our movement like they hijacked the Tea Party. Now is the time they're crushed for good and we throw them away.

[GeorgiaModerate]

Ah yes, the Mandel Brat Set.

Posts like this make me wish you could hit the recommend button more than once.

[2016]

Rougly all is counted in OHIO now.

Looking at the Governor Vote Totals

Republicans  1,070,000

Democrats barely above 500K

Record Republican Turnout EVERYWHERE!

[Shaula🏳️‍⚧️]

I think the more Trump-endorsed candidates win their primaries, the more confident Trump will feel in endorsing more risky candidates or getting involved in House primaries he otherwise would have left alone.

[Unelectable Bystander]

I don’t think it’s been emphasized enough that Vance beat Dolan by a full 9% and that it was not Dolan but Mandel who was comfortably in 2nd place. A lot of the Election Day analysis was wish-casting that was never grounded in reality even as it became apparent that Vance was cruising to an easy win

[ElectionsGuy]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

[GALeftist]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

Weirdo Twitter ET Con terminology. Pay it no mind

[Schiff for Senate]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

It's far-right loony gibberish. But I appreciate it nonetheless...it provides a window into the way these people's minds work.

[Huey Long is a Republican]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

When you care more about electability or care about voting for a woman because they're a woman and are "hot" instead of their actual policy. Example, Those who likes Mace and Noem despite their horrendous policies, actions, and flaws, such as Noem vetoing an anti-trans bill or Mace basically trying to be a Republican Squad-girl but you still back them because they're electable.

[Senator Incitatus]

Being beautiful is a sign of virtue. Appearance is the first thing I look for in a candidate.

[Shaula🏳️‍⚧️]

Being beautiful is a sign of virtue. Appearance is the first thing I look for in a candidate.

Then I can take a guess which candidate you support in the Alabama Senate race...

[Unelectable Bystander]

I think there’s a good balance somewhere in the middle here. Clearly there is no place for identity politics on the right, but there’s nothing wrong with hyping up GOP women who win their races fair and square. This creates a big tent image.

I disagree that moderate = good candidate but there’s absolutely value in having Miss Ohio representing the party. I also don’t see the theory that small majority with the right people is better than a big majority with a variety of people. This sounds like leftist speak, the best strategy is to win all the races.

Also electabro basement caucus is such a funny term

[Anti Democrat Democrat Club]

I can't wait until May 17.

[2016]

Big Warning Sign for Democrats in North Carolina:

# 1 There are now more Independent Registered Voters than Democrats or Republicans in the State.
# 2 Independent requesting a Republican Primary Ballot over a Democratic Ballot by a whopping 31 Percentage Points (65 % to 34 %)
https://twitter.com/IAPolls2022/status/1523308843802906624

# 3 Polls have shown Independents massivly disapproving of President Biden in the State and the two Major Republican Senate Candidates Ted Budd & Pat McCrory leading the de facto Democratic Nominee Cheri Beasley by a considerably margin.

[Senator Incitatus]

Being beautiful is a sign of virtue. Appearance is the first thing I look for in a candidate.

Then I can take a guess which candidate you support in the Alabama Senate race...

That's right—Mo Brooks. (Jessica Taylor dropped out.)

[ElectionsGuy]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

When you care more about electability or care about voting for a woman because they're a woman and are "hot" instead of their actual policy. Example, Those who likes Mace and Noem despite their horrendous policies, actions, and flaws, such as Noem vetoing an anti-trans bill or Mace basically trying to be a Republican Squad-girl but you still back them because they're electable.

Ok. I'm guessing you watch a lot of Red Eagle's videos?

[Huey Long is a Republican]

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

GOP Woman Power
https://twitter.com/CLFSuperPAC/status/1521684778981986304

Lol why are you obsessed about "GOP women". Who cares? Let's get good candidates in office instead of focusing on irrelevant things.

You are consistently endorsing or pulling for bad Candidates like Majewski!

Yeah, no, I don't back the idea of "We need as many Republicans as possible and Republican Women too!" because you just reek of electabro basement caucus. I'd rather have a House Majority of 10 with the RIGHT People (ie, great policy on trade, immigration, the family, election integrity, etc) than have a House Majority of 60 with 30 Mitt Romneys. If that's the case, tell me what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans outside of Muh Tax Cutzzz!

So yeah, Simp, leave. We don't need you in the party if you're going to be worshipping at the alter of women because women.

Can someone tell me what this means?

When you care more about electability or care about voting for a woman because they're a woman and are "hot" instead of their actual policy. Example, Those who likes Mace and Noem despite their horrendous policies, actions, and flaws, such as Noem vetoing an anti-trans bill or Mace basically trying to be a Republican Squad-girl but you still back them because they're electable.

Ok. I'm guessing you watch a lot of Red Eagle's videos?

Mate, I watch Red Eagle, Vince Dao, David Carlson, Real American, etc. I don't share all their beliefs, but I do agree with 95% of the things they favor and most of the things they say as well.

[wbrocks67]

Big Warning Sign for Democrats in North Carolina:

# 1 There are now more Independent Registered Voters than Democrats or Republicans in the State.
# 2 Independent requesting a Republican Primary Ballot over a Democratic Ballot by a whopping 31 Percentage Points (65 % to 34 %)
https://twitter.com/IAPolls2022/status/1523308843802906624

# 3 Polls have shown Independents massivly disapproving of President Biden in the State and the two Major Republican Senate Candidates Ted Budd & Pat McCrory leading the de facto Democratic Nominee Cheri Beasley by a considerably margin.

.... because there is a contested republican primary going on compared to the Democratic side. This is the same thing as Ohio. It's apples to oranges and shouldn't be compared. Independents may be strategically picking the R side because there is more races to vote on, compared to the D side

[SnowLabrador]

Big Warning Sign for Democrats in North Carolina:

# 1 There are now more Independent Registered Voters than Democrats or Republicans in the State.
# 2 Independent requesting a Republican Primary Ballot over a Democratic Ballot by a whopping 31 Percentage Points (65 % to 34 %)
https://twitter.com/IAPolls2022/status/1523308843802906624

# 3 Polls have shown Independents massivly disapproving of President Biden in the State and the two Major Republican Senate Candidates Ted Budd & Pat McCrory leading the de facto Democratic Nominee Cheri Beasley by a considerably margin.

.... because there is a contested republican primary going on compared to the Democratic side. This is the same thing as Ohio. It's apples to oranges and shouldn't be compared. Independents may be strategically picking the R side because there is more races to vote on, compared to the D side

If I remember correctly, in the NC-SEN 2020 primary there were almost half a million more D votes than R votes. If primary turnout was a reliable indicator of general election turnout, Cal Cunningham would be a Senator, even with the affair revelation.

[AncestralDemocrat.]

In regards to the WV results later today, the political establishment of my state closing ranks around McKinley hasn't helped him.. somehow he's made Mooney come across as a insurgent outsider.

[Penn_Quaker_Girl]

In regards to the WV results later today, the political establishment of my state closing ranks around McKinley hasn't helped him.. somehow he's made Mooney come across as a insurgent outsider.

Question for you AD:

I don't know much about WV-01, but would Mollohan (D) have held the seat in 2010 if he hadn't faced ethical violations?

[AncestralDemocrat.]

In regards to the WV results later today, the political establishment of my state closing ranks around McKinley hasn't helped him.. somehow he's made Mooney come across as a insurgent outsider.

Question for you AD:

I don't know much about WV-01, but would Mollohan (D) have held the seat in 2010 if he hadn't faced ethical violations?

Yes, and relatively comfortably.. McKinley only won by a point despite a particularly bruising democratic primary.

At that point, there was still significant D support downballot.. Rahall won by double digits in the third.

[NewYorkExpress]

In regards to the WV results later today, the political establishment of my state closing ranks around McKinley hasn't helped him.. somehow he's made Mooney come across as a insurgent outsider.

Question for you AD:

I don't know much about WV-01, but would Mollohan (D) have held the seat in 2010 if he hadn't faced ethical violations?

Given 2010 turned out to be a pretty massive Republican wave, I don't think so. Honestly, if Nick Rahall in WV-3 and Joe Manchin in the Senate Special election had received stronger challengers (for example, had Shelley Moore Capito decided to run in the Senate special election), both those seats would have flipped as well.