LGC 5.0 - Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act - STATUTE
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:48:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  LGC 5.0 - Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act - STATUTE
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: LGC 5.0 - Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act - STATUTE  (Read 805 times)
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 17, 2021, 11:26:44 PM »
« edited: January 03, 2022, 06:40:48 PM by Utah Neolib »

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:
1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.
2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.
II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.
3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes.Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for five years, being reduced by 55% each year, with funding ending in the sixth year. After that, $10,000,000 will be allocated to governments for the maintenance of bike lanes. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

Sponsor: Sirius04
Slot 1
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2021, 11:35:34 PM »

This is pretty straightforward. The bill is intended to increase the popularity of cycling in Lincoln. It does 2 main things to do this. The first is eliminating sales taxes for bikes. I don't think Lincoln currently has a sales tax, but it is does eliminate any state, county, or municipal tax and if Lincoln ever did introduce a sales tax or VAT tax bikes would be exempt. The other part is to appropriate funding to help local jurisdictions build more bike lanes. This funding would be distributed through the Office of Public Transportation Grants, a body established by L.C. 8.5 (https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=390065.0). Cycling is a mode of transportation that has been well proven by now to be clean and space efficient, and investment like this has gone very well in several cities.
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2021, 11:37:23 PM »

This figure of $2 billion is kind of a guess really, if that isn't enough I'm fine with changing it. But given how much surplus we have right now I don't think it should be cut down.
Logged
Brother Jonathan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2021, 11:43:17 PM »

Is there a time after which the $2 billion for bike lines will no longer be distributed every fiscal year? I see no indication that the bill provides for an end to the funding, which would lead me to think that the funding would just continue at the initial rate until the General Court decided to amend it downward or repeal the program, meaning that we would have to constantly re-visit this program down the road, which seems to me to make it more likely that the grants will remain unnecessarily high for quite some time. Seems a rather cumbersome complication to an otherwise straightforward proposal. Would the sponsor be open to including a provision providing that the funding be phased out over time? I have no objection to the sum, however.
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2021, 12:09:11 AM »

The OPTG could be given the option to reduce the funding after a certain amount of time.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,140
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2021, 12:06:13 PM »

I support the general principles of the bill, and all movements to reduce and phase out cars, but in your interpretation, does it hinder pedestrian options in any way?
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2021, 05:27:10 PM »

I support this bill as currently constructed
Logged
Brother Jonathan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2021, 10:13:29 PM »

I still think we should create a timeline for this bill, rather than outsourcing $2 billion in annual funding for bike lanes to the sole discretion of the OPTG ad infinitum. If we find we want to increase the sum or renew the program, we could choose to do that down the road, but I will only support the bill if we set a funding phase out with a hard deadline, requiring any extensions or modifications to be passed by the General Court. I would think maybe 5 years would be sufficient. It could look something like this:

Year 1: $2 billion
Year 2: $1 billion (50% decrease)
Year 3: $500 million (50% decrease)
Year 4: $175 million (65% decrease)
Year 5: $87.5 million (50% decrease)

So a total of around $3.8 billion over five years. Alternatively as well, we could create a two-year period of full funding, and then start the five-year phase-out on the third year of the program, which would add $4 billion to the total.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2021, 11:26:05 PM »

2 billion is a lot of money.....

(Suprise Howard Dean KD fiscal restraint path)

But as a cycling enthusiast, I do support this. I like Brother Jonathan's schedule, but yeah....a lot of money...
Logged
Brother Jonathan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2021, 01:41:30 PM »

I'll propose an amendment to add the schedule, though I am open to modifying it if members want to adjust the schedule

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:
1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.
2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.
II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.
3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for five years, being reduced by 55% each year, with funding ending in the sixth year. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

So the new schedule would look like this:

2023: $2,000,000,000
2024: $900,000,000
2025: $405,000,000
2026: $182,250,000
2027: $82,012,500

So a total of just shy of $3.6 billion over five years.
Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2021, 06:50:16 PM »

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:

1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.

2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.

II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.

3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for ten years, being reduced by 10% each year, with funding ending in the eleventh year. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2021, 09:38:51 PM »

I'll propose an amendment to add the schedule, though I am open to modifying it if members want to adjust the schedule

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:
1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.
2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.
II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.
3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for five years, being reduced by 55% each year, with funding ending in the sixth year. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

So the new schedule would look like this:

2023: $2,000,000,000
2024: $900,000,000
2025: $405,000,000
2026: $182,250,000
2027: $82,012,500

So a total of just shy of $3.6 billion over five years.
I object to the amendment, vote on the amendment starts immediately.
Nay
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2021, 09:44:58 PM »

This is a very reasonable amendment
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2021, 09:57:36 PM »

Considering this is construction, I agree with the amendment, though we should keep some funding for maintenance in the future
Logged
Brother Jonathan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2021, 10:04:03 PM »

Aye on my amendment
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2021, 10:15:47 PM »

I'll propose an amendment to add the schedule, though I am open to modifying it if members want to adjust the schedule

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:
1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.
2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.
II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.
3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes.Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for five years, being reduced by 55% each year, with funding ending in the sixth year. After that, $10,000,000 will be allocated to governments for the maintenance of bike lanes. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

So the new schedule would look like this:

2023: $2,000,000,000
2024: $900,000,000
2025: $405,000,000
2026: $182,250,000
2027: $82,012,500

So a total of just shy of $3.6 billion over five years.
Above would be my amendment to Brother Jonathan's amendment
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,140
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2021, 02:35:29 AM »

Aye on Brother Jonathan's amendment.
Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2021, 12:54:10 PM »

Brother Jonathan’s amendment passes 3-1, closing it because Sirius voting would not change the outcome of this.
Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2021, 12:57:23 PM »

I'll propose an amendment to add the schedule, though I am open to modifying it if members want to adjust the schedule

Quote
Lincoln Cycling Subsidies Act

An act to encourage cycling in Lincoln

Quote
I. Definitions:
1. A bicycle shall be defined as a two wheeled vehicle which is propelled by pedals which are pushed by the rider.
2. A bike lane shall be defined as a paved right of way established exclusively for use by cyclists, whether it be a standalone path or built within an existing road.
II. Actions:
1. The region of Lincoln shall levy no tax on the sale of bicycles.
2. No jurisdiction within the region of Lincoln shall levy any tax on the sale of bicycles.
3. For each fiscal year, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes.Starting in fiscal year 2023, $2,000,000,000 shall be appropriated for the construction of bike lanes. Funding shall continue for five years, being reduced by 55% each year, with funding ending in the sixth year. After that, $10,000,000 will be allocated to governments for the maintenance of bike lanes. This sum shall be distributed to state, county, and municipal governments in the region of Lincoln by the Office of Public Transportation grants in accordance with the process described in sections 1b and 1c of L.C. 8.5.
4. This act shall take effect at the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

So the new schedule would look like this:

2023: $2,000,000,000
2024: $900,000,000
2025: $405,000,000
2026: $182,250,000
2027: $82,012,500

So a total of just shy of $3.6 billion over five years.
Above would be my amendment to Brother Jonathan's amendment
Amendment is friendly
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2021, 12:00:38 AM »

I don't know why you decided that the amendment was friendly but I'll accept that amendment as friendly.
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2021, 12:46:55 AM »

I support the general principles of the bill, and all movements to reduce and phase out cars, but in your interpretation, does it hinder pedestrian options in any way?
I don't see how it would, it's been well proven that pedestrians and bikes can coexist.
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2021, 12:47:10 AM »

I motion for a final vote.
Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,973
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2021, 12:27:24 PM »

Aye
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,111
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2021, 12:31:08 PM »

Aye
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2021, 12:35:39 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.