#WalkAway founder facing charges for Capitol riot begging for money blaming "leftist activists"

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

https://www.politicalflare.com/2021/06/capitol-rioter-cries-and-begs-for-money-because-leftist-activists-annihilated-me-financially

LOL this clown never stops gritfting. Glad the chickens came home to roost for him though.

[THG]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

[DrScholl]

These grifters only do these things to scam conservatives out of their money. I suspect some of them have no political leaning one way or another and are only about making as much money as possible without actually doing much work.

[Hammy]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

[THG]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

You know I’m correct. We have dolts on both sides- the only difference is that Republicans seem to acknowledge this.

[lfromnj]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1267555018128965643

I think he means this.

[THG]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

This scenario does exist, for your information:

https://mobile.twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1267555018128965643?ref_src=twsrc...

[DrScholl]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

[Ferguson97]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

This scenario does exist, for your information:

Minnesota protestors did not try to overthrow the government...

[THG]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

[THG]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

This scenario does exist, for your information:

Minnesota protestors did not try to overthrow the government...

Portland ANTIFA rioters did:

https://nypost.com/2020/07/22/portland-protesters-barricade-courthouse-with-federal-officers-inside/amp/

[MasterJedi]

Is this a Fuzzy sock?

[Non Swing Voter]

well good thing for him that his fellow insurrectionists and Trump-enthusiasts are upstanding high-income tax payers with tons of resources to donate to him.  he should be fine.

[Ferguson97]

Is this a Fuzzy sock?

No I think Republicans are just like this

[Morning in Atlas]

Is this a Fuzzy sock?

Nope, just a guy who thinks rioting's okay if it's for his causes.

[GeneralMacArthur]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

This is like posting a picture of the L.A. Race Riots to "own" anyone who thinks Rodney King shouldn't have been beaten.

BLM isn't responsible for these burned buildings and lootings and riots.  What started as peaceful protests were hijacked by violent criminals who had absolutely nothing to do with BLM but saw the opportunity to pull s--t.  The rioting and looting and burning was condemned by virtually every BLM group as well as 100% of Democratic politicians.

In contrast, with the 1/6 insurrection, the entire point was to overthrow the election.  The violence was the entire point.  The violence was organized, planned and perpetrated by the leaders of the insurrection.  It was encouraged and celebrated by Republican/MAGA politicians and public figures.

There is no excuse.  The two are not comparable in any way.  But even if they were, every single Democrat has condemned the violence in the Minneapolis riots, but no Republican is willing to condemn the violence of the 1/6 insurrection.  Instead you guys do this motte-and-bailey thing where the motte is "the violence was bad but we need to move on for the good of the country (and thus should have investigations or accountability)" and the bailey is "the violence was justified, the election was a sham, Ashley Babbit is a martyr, and this was all a good thing."

[ꙮ]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

As a staunch supporter of gay rights, this is just as bad as gay supporters harassing an anti gay boat with the pro gay boat blowing up and neading to be rescued by an anti gay boat.

[Hammy]

If this dolt was a BLM rioter, prominent liberal politicians would be donating to his “freedom fund.”

Because of course they would.

Ah yes, the typical Republican go-to when their side are shown to be deplorables: make up a scenario that doesn't exist purely to scream "both sides"

This scenario does exist, for your information:

Minnesota protestors did not try to overthrow the government...

Portland ANTIFA rioters did:

https://nypost.com/2020/07/22/portland-protesters-barricade-courthouse-with-federal-officers-inside/amp/

Do explain how barricading a government building that is closed for business overnight in protest (something that's been done frequently in protest throughout the country's history) is somehow equal to trying to stop the legislature from certifying the results because you're mad that your side lost, while treatening/trying to kill the people who won't go along with it.

[afleitch]

Oh her.

[DrScholl]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

Some buildings were set on fire by outside instigators, but regardless the attack on the Capitol could have had farther reaching consequences for the nation than scattered riots. One thing isn't better than the other, the potential consequences are just different.

[THG]

Is this a Fuzzy sock?

Nope, just a guy who thinks rioting's okay if it's for his causes.

I believe that every single violent capitol rioter should be thrown in the cooler for a lengthy, lengthy period of time, and I find many of Trump’s actions prior to 1/6 to be fairly reckless and vapid, if not delusional.


I cannot cognize whatever the crux of the polemic you seem to be attempting to construct is meant to be. I have never defended the capitol riots or any forms of political violence.

[ProudModerate2]

Is this a Fuzzy sock?

I think you might be on to something.

[THG]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

This is like posting a picture of the L.A. Race Riots to "own" anyone who thinks Rodney King shouldn't have been beaten.

BLM isn't responsible for these burned buildings and lootings and riots.  What started as peaceful protests were hijacked by violent criminals who had absolutely nothing to do with BLM but saw the opportunity to pull s--t.  The rioting and looting and burning was condemned by virtually every BLM group as well as 100% of Democratic politicians.

In contrast, with the 1/6 insurrection, the entire point was to overthrow the election.  The violence was the entire point.  The violence was organized, planned and perpetrated by the leaders of the insurrection.  It was encouraged and celebrated by Republican/MAGA politicians and public figures.

There is no excuse.  The two are not comparable in any way.  But even if they were, every single Democrat has condemned the violence in the Minneapolis riots, but no Republican is willing to condemn the violence of the 1/6 insurrection.  Instead you guys do this motte-and-bailey thing where the motte is "the violence was bad but we need to move on for the good of the country (and thus should have investigations or accountability)" and the bailey is "the violence was justified, the election was a sham, Ashley Babbit is a martyr, and this was all a good thing."

This is one of the most vapid statements I’ve had the misfortune to read in all my years of cognitive ability.

Every single Republican official has condemned 1/6. I cannot think of anyone on the right who supports it- you’d have to stoop to the levels of Groypers and legitimate QTards to find anyone who genuinely “supported” it. And that’s the seafloor.

[THG]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

So you support violent insurrections as long as leftists do it?

I’m not shocked.

[NYSforKennedy2024]

Nobody from BLM led an attack on the Capitol. Had that happened before Trump's inauguration, every black person in this country would have been shot execution style and dumped in mass graves. How is that for both sides?

Was this much better than an attack on the capitol?:

So you support violent insurrections as long as leftists do it?

I’m not shocked.

You can't insurrect an empty building dummy.