Peruvian Elections and Politics: Boluarte era, political crisis continues
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:19:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Peruvian Elections and Politics: Boluarte era, political crisis continues
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 48
Author Topic: Peruvian Elections and Politics: Boluarte era, political crisis continues  (Read 67764 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: June 06, 2021, 10:32:47 PM »

It's worth mentioning that the 2016 election was not polarized between poor rural areas and middle class urban areas in a meaningful way. Also, given that the old Fujimori base among poors in parts of Peru seems to no longer exist, there's every reason to think this election will be far more polarized than 2011 was.
Why is it that the old Fujimori poors rural base seems to no longer exist?
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,778
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: June 06, 2021, 10:50:16 PM »

Ipsos' quick count has Castillo +0.4. Fingers crossed...
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,672


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: June 06, 2021, 11:09:08 PM »

The geography of the vote of the 2011 and 2021 elections is very lookalike. Olanta Humalla was also a left-wing populist, a good fit for poor rural areas
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elecciones_generales_de_Per%C3%BA_de_2011

The geography was different in 2016, because PPK was a center-right candidate
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: June 06, 2021, 11:20:28 PM »

This could go anywhere, just like 2016. Impressive.

Didn’t the 1st round quick count underestimate Castillo a little bit, or I’m wrong? Rooting that there’s at least a minimal undercount of the Rural vote.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: June 06, 2021, 11:23:51 PM »

Ipsos exit poll:



Well, apparently they underestimated both Castillo and Fujimori so no way to tell for sure. It ended up 19% and 14% respectively.

But the fact they overrated De Soto could be evidence they tend to favor Lima/urban vote a bit? That’s where I’m putting my hopes on for now. But really, there’s no way to know until everything is counted.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,306


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: June 06, 2021, 11:33:58 PM »

It's worth mentioning that the 2016 election was not polarized between poor rural areas and middle class urban areas in a meaningful way. Also, given that the old Fujimori base among poors in parts of Peru seems to no longer exist, there's every reason to think this election will be far more polarized than 2011 was.
Why is it that the old Fujimori poors rural base seems to no longer exist?

As Buritobr pointed out this election is more comparable to 2011 than 2016, and if the exit poll's geography is correct then Fujimori's rural support hasn't gone anywhere. If anything she's doing slightly better in that respect since she managed to win Ucayali. The thing is that poor Fujimorists are disproportionately concentrated in Greater Lima, the Northwest and to a lesser extent the Amazon.

Also with respect to the argument about Arequipa, Fujimori was never going to do well there even in the event of a win. De Soto did disproportionately well there but it's worth noting that he's actually from Arequipa and that actually matters in Peru (just look at Acuna in La Libertad). Those votes aren't just going to all transfer to Fujimori even if she has De Soto's endorsement.

I still think like Castillo is more likely to be underpolled than Fujimori but I guess we'll see
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: June 06, 2021, 11:38:48 PM »

If Canal Sur is anything to go by, the ONPE chief is speaking right now.
Logged
skbl17
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 421
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: June 06, 2021, 11:39:03 PM »

First report from ONPE (42.03% of polling stations counted):

- Fujimori: 52.9%
- Castillo: 47.1%
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: June 06, 2021, 11:39:18 PM »
« Edited: June 06, 2021, 11:43:22 PM by TheDeadFlagBlues »

OPNE quick count shows Fujimori with nearly 53% of the vote - very cool, Peru is going to die now lol.

Edit: as it turns out, the Ipsos is a quick count and these are just initial results which are extremely biased.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: June 06, 2021, 11:42:01 PM »

I think this should be underrepresenting rurals which report later, so - might actually be fine (or even good) for Castillo?
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: June 06, 2021, 11:42:19 PM »

2016 was a center-right PPK vs far-right Fujimori so naturally Lima didn’t favor Keiko in high numbers like this year. While at the same time, Keiko performed much better in rural areas that dislike moderates. 2021 is more like 2011 indeed in terms of vote divide.

Big cities tend to favor centrists leaning to the right while rural areas populists regardless of their side. But if you put an unapologetic leftist then big cities will immediately shift for the far-right option while rural areas will support the leftist.
Logged
seb_pard
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: June 06, 2021, 11:45:17 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,672


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: June 06, 2021, 11:45:43 PM »

After 42% of the precints proceeded

Keiko Fujimori 52.9%, Pedro Castillo 47.1%

https://elcomercio.pe/politica/elecciones/resultados-onpe-elecciones-peru-2021-cifras-oficiales-en-todo-el-peru-de-segunda-vuelta-de-las-elecciones-generales-2021-jne-pedro-castillo-keiko-fujimori-nuevo-presidente-resultados-oficiales-ganadores-en-lima-callao-y-ciudades-regiones-boca-de-urna-conteo-rapido-peru-libre-fuerza-popular-noticia/
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: June 06, 2021, 11:47:42 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Likewise with 87% Castillo in Puno and 88% in Huancavelica.
Logged
skbl17
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 421
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: June 06, 2021, 11:48:03 PM »

The official ONPE results page is now available.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: June 06, 2021, 11:48:30 PM »

Difference will probably diminish as more of the rural vote gets counted, the question is how much?
Logged
warandwar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 871
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: June 06, 2021, 11:48:42 PM »

It's worth mentioning that the 2016 election was not polarized between poor rural areas and middle class urban areas in a meaningful way. Also, given that the old Fujimori base among poors in parts of Peru seems to no longer exist, there's every reason to think this election will be far more polarized than 2011 was.
Why is it that the old Fujimori poors rural base seems to no longer exist?
I'm not sure what DFB meant but a fair amount of Fujimori 1990 voters fled the countryside to the slum exurbs of Lima in the 90s (still a good part of her base). Others have deserted over the years, especially in reaction to the recent corruption scandals.
Logged
mileslunn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: June 06, 2021, 11:52:46 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Likewise with 87% Castillo in Puno and 88% in Huancavelica.

Do Indigenous voters go heavily for left?  I know Puno having been there is overwhelmingly indigenous while is Fujimoro more popular amongst Whites and Mestizos? 
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: June 06, 2021, 11:53:47 PM »

Canada

Fujimori 76,5%
Castillo 23,5%

Mexico

Fujimori 73,3%
Castillo 26,7%

Colombia

Fujimori 72,5%
Castillo 27,5%

Bolivia

Fujimori 64,7%
Castillo 35,3%

Brazil (25% counted)

Fujimori 55,4%
Castillo 44,6%
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,794


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: June 06, 2021, 11:54:24 PM »

Difference will probably diminish as more of the rural vote gets counted, the question is how much?

The real takeaway from my perspective is a 6.3% abstention rate, whereas every poll - even the Ipsos exit - had that over 10%. Unless the pollsters were including metaphorical couch-sitters than that's a big difference.

If true we might be heading for a result that diverges from every data point so far...which might be in Keiko's favor given the composition of the round 1 electorate.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: June 06, 2021, 11:54:59 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Likewise with 87% Castillo in Puno and 88% in Huancavelica.

Folks, this election isn't actually that similar to 2011! I've been saying this:
Puno in 2011 - Humala 78%, Keiko 22%
Huancavelica in 2011 - Humala 72%, Keiko 28%

Worth mentioning that results in both places likely understate Castillo's support.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: June 06, 2021, 11:56:18 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Likewise with 87% Castillo in Puno and 88% in Huancavelica.

Do Indigenous voters go heavily for left?  I know Puno having been there is overwhelmingly indigenous while is Fujimoro more popular amongst Whites and Mestizos? 

To my knowledge, while indigenous voters have tended to back the left rather heavily over the past decade, this kind of consolidation is pretty unprecedented.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: June 06, 2021, 11:58:50 PM »

Keiko with 88% support in San Isidro lol
Likewise with 87% Castillo in Puno and 88% in Huancavelica.

Do Indigenous voters go heavily for left?  I know Puno having been there is overwhelmingly indigenous while is Fujimoro more popular amongst Whites and Mestizos? 

To my knowledge, while indigenous voters have tended to back the left rather heavily over the past decade, this kind of consolidation is pretty unprecedented.
Castillo's candidancy is pretty much tailor-made to win quasi-DPRK margins in places like Puno, isn't it?
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,068
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: June 07, 2021, 12:00:49 AM »

Difference will probably diminish as more of the rural vote gets counted, the question is how much?

The real takeaway from my perspective is a 6.3% abstention rate, whereas every poll - even the Ipsos exit - had that over 10%. Unless the pollsters were including metaphorical couch-sitters than that's a big difference.

If true we might be heading for a result that diverges from every data point so far...which might be in Keiko's favor given the composition of the round 1 electorate.

Based on ONPE, Lima is 51% counted while Castillo areas are 30% counted.

So the difference will diminish to close the gap. The question is, will it be enough? There’s still plenty of vote to be counted as it’s 43% overall now.

If I had to guess, IPSOS got it perfectly and whoever wins will do it with just over 50%.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,987
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: June 07, 2021, 12:03:33 AM »

I think Castillo has this because in the most remote areas, he's pulling well over 90% and it's pretty evident that there are lots of remote villages where 0 votes have been counted where he's set to win 95% of the vote or more.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 48  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 12 queries.