2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:56:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 ... 157
Author Topic: 2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 168818 times)
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,503


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2825 on: October 13, 2022, 10:22:32 AM »

Let thank sink in:
The Field Dates for the CNN/SSRS Poll is September 3 to October 5

A ONE-MONTH POLL, give me a break!

And I still read your posts with in a deep voice with a heavy drawl with a bit of a snicker. You’re just that partisan. If we were somehow magically transported to 1992, I would probably be reading your voice the way I currently read Torie’s or Santander’s post.
I don't believe in Bipartisanship anymore (I used to) but these Days are long gone now. Name one Bipartisan Legislation over the last 20 years that benefitted Republicans? Hint: You won't find one.
Bipartisan Legislation only benefits Democrats these Days.
Logged
BenjiG98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.00, S: -2.26

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2826 on: October 13, 2022, 10:25:14 AM »

Let thank sink in:
The Field Dates for the CNN/SSRS Poll is September 3 to October 5

A ONE-MONTH POLL, give me a break!

And I still read your posts with in a deep voice with a heavy drawl with a bit of a snicker. You’re just that partisan. If we were somehow magically transported to 1992, I would probably be reading your voice the way I currently read Torie’s or Santander’s post.
I don't believe in Bipartisanship anymore (I used to) but these Days are long gone now. Name one Bipartisan Legislation over the last 20 years that benefitted Republicans? Hint: You won't find one.
Bipartisan Legislation only benefits Democrats these Days.
Bipartisan legislation isn't designed to benefit any political party. That's not how you should be viewing it. It's intended for, you know, citizens. Also, what about bills like the First Step Act? That means nothing?
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,341
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2827 on: October 13, 2022, 10:25:43 AM »

Ok,
wbrocks67
You are now being put officially on Ignore! Impossible to talk to you.

"Hi pot, I'm kettle"
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2828 on: October 13, 2022, 10:26:40 AM »

Let thank sink in:
The Field Dates for the CNN/SSRS Poll is September 3 to October 5

A ONE-MONTH POLL, give me a break!

And I still read your posts with in a deep voice with a heavy drawl with a bit of a snicker. You’re just that partisan. If we were somehow magically transported to 1992, I would probably be reading your voice the way I currently read Torie’s or Santander’s post.
I don't believe in Bipartisanship anymore (I used to) but these Days are long gone now. Name one Bipartisan Legislation over the last 20 years that benefitted Republicans? Hint: You won't find one.
Bipartisan Legislation only benefits Democrats these Days.
21st Century CURES Act? Right To Try? For people in science and health care, that was YUGE.
Logged
AncestralDemocrat.
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,415
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2829 on: October 13, 2022, 01:32:58 PM »

Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2830 on: October 13, 2022, 01:41:32 PM »



Hm yeah, outside GOP groups have spent $1.2M here thus far, and Dems have spent $0.

It seems they always figured they didn't have a chance here, though this is another district that may look bad in hindsight that they didn't try and invest in.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2831 on: October 13, 2022, 01:47:19 PM »

NRCC now dumping $1.3M into CO-08. We have a real race here.

https://twitter.com/CATargetAlt/status/1580629530829475841
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2832 on: October 13, 2022, 02:05:08 PM »



Hm yeah, outside GOP groups have spent $1.2M here thus far, and Dems have spent $0.

It seems they always figured they didn't have a chance here, though this is another district that may look bad in hindsight that they didn't try and invest in.

Probably a top 2024 target for Dems...not hard to see an increased Dem margin in Maricopa and a subpar midterm performance in rural Latino areas of SE AZ.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2833 on: October 13, 2022, 02:38:33 PM »

Susquehanna (in partnership with The Federalist).... find the GCB tied, 48-48

https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/13/in-new-fdrlst-susquehanna-poll-voters-affirm-dobbs-oppose-big-tech-censorship/
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2834 on: October 13, 2022, 02:45:59 PM »

Rachel Maddow on MSNBC not 538 says it's a 51/44 map now GA, PA, NV, AZ, NH D, UT, OH, NC and WI Tossup I will still watch out for IA, IN, SD and LA but as of now it's 51/44

It's best for us to wait til 24 to win FL with Gwen Graham v Rick Scott especially since DeSantis is gonna be the R nominated take away FL from him
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,707


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2835 on: October 13, 2022, 03:23:07 PM »


They previously had it as R+1 (44-43) in September.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2836 on: October 13, 2022, 03:42:10 PM »

Improvement for the dems ?
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2837 on: October 13, 2022, 04:05:00 PM »



Hm yeah, outside GOP groups have spent $1.2M here thus far, and Dems have spent $0.

It seems they always figured they didn't have a chance here, though this is another district that may look bad in hindsight that they didn't try and invest in.

AZ-6 feels like a loss for the Dems because it is a Biden seat but in terms of odds, it is less favorable than an urban narrow Trump seat like FL-27.

If Peltola, Kaptur, Golden and Cartwright survive, the GOP would need to win 13 Biden seats to gain majority. (Biden won 226-209 in terms of CDs).

Obviously PA-1, CA-40 are unlikely flip, as is NY-1. AZ-6 probably flips red.

That said, it's the next tier where you never know what could happen. NM-2, CA-45, CO-8 are heavily minority seats
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,208


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2838 on: October 13, 2022, 05:01:36 PM »



This is one race where the GOP actually has a significant candidate quality advantage over the Dems. The triage probably makes sense despite the district's presidential lean.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,116


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2839 on: October 13, 2022, 05:08:04 PM »

Republicans should be getting nervous that Democrats continue to cling to a generic ballot lead, this keeps them in contention for keeping the majority. Republicans are late for a surge like in 2014, they are cutting it close.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2840 on: October 13, 2022, 05:34:56 PM »

Republicans should be getting nervous that Democrats continue to cling to a generic ballot lead, this keeps them in contention for keeping the majority. Republicans are late for a surge like in 2014, they are cutting it close.
They are fine polls are fundamentally more flawed this year.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,341
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2841 on: October 13, 2022, 06:09:12 PM »

Republicans should be getting nervous that Democrats continue to cling to a generic ballot lead, this keeps them in contention for keeping the majority. Republicans are late for a surge like in 2014, they are cutting it close.
They are fine polls are fundamentally more flawed this year.

How do you know? We have polls and special election results.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,162
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2842 on: October 13, 2022, 06:13:31 PM »

Republicans should be getting nervous that Democrats continue to cling to a generic ballot lead, this keeps them in contention for keeping the majority. Republicans are late for a surge like in 2014, they are cutting it close.
They are fine polls are fundamentally more flawed this year.

How do you know? We have polls and special election results.

It's a fair expectation in America over the past six years, but there isn't necessarily any actual proof for it yet.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2843 on: October 14, 2022, 01:59:35 AM »

Actually in 2018 the RCP generic congressional polls underestimated the dems
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2844 on: October 14, 2022, 07:44:41 AM »

This doesn't seem entirely surprising to me? The Dems already have a House Majority. The focus should always be to maintain all of those seats first and then use extra money to go into ones they think they can also get.

God knows the takes we'd be seeing if they were just blowing their money allover the place and not spending enough to save their own incumbents.

The article also only briefs touches on candidate fundraising, as if these candidates have no money to air ads themselves. Take Smith for example - she doesn't have DCCC/HMP support, but she raised nearly $2M last quarter. These types of things also factor into the decisions, clearly.

But hey, it's also what happens when the GOP has unlimited money from a million billionaire donors. There's only so much you can do to keep up with that.

Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2845 on: October 14, 2022, 09:08:28 AM »
« Edited: October 14, 2022, 09:11:45 AM by Devils30 »

This doesn't seem entirely surprising to me? The Dems already have a House Majority. The focus should always be to maintain all of those seats first and then use extra money to go into ones they think they can also get.

God knows the takes we'd be seeing if they were just blowing their money allover the place and not spending enough to save their own incumbents.

The article also only briefs touches on candidate fundraising, as if these candidates have no money to air ads themselves. Take Smith for example - she doesn't have DCCC/HMP support, but she raised nearly $2M last quarter. These types of things also factor into the decisions, clearly.

But hey, it's also what happens when the GOP has unlimited money from a million billionaire donors. There's only so much you can do to keep up with that.



It's an interesting strategy, you can argue that the CA-27's partisan lean could be enough to flip the seat on its own. A lot depends if the Biden- downballot R voters have had it with the GOP after Dobbs.

I would ask Bloomberg for a big last minute donation as well, it could help a lot in SoCal.

Wasserman has also made a big deal about open seats- they do drain resources. That said, quite a few (RI-2, OR-5 and 6, NY-3,4, NC-1, IL-17, CA-13) went for Biden by a considerable margin that partisan lean might save them even if Ds underperform Biden by 4-5%.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2846 on: October 14, 2022, 10:14:41 AM »

Washington Post-Ipsos poll of Latino voters finds D+27 on the GCB, 63-36.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/14/hispanic-voters-democrats/

Also says Dems have huge leads in Midwest, West, and Northeast, but only up by 9 in the South. Bolds well for Kelly and Masto, then.
Logged
Penn_Quaker_Girl
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,403
India


Political Matrix
E: 0.10, S: 0.06

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2847 on: October 14, 2022, 10:15:56 AM »

Washington Post-Ipsos poll of Latino voters finds D+27 on the GCB, 63-36.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/14/hispanic-voters-democrats/

Also says Dems have huge leads in Midwest, West, and Northeast, but only up by 9 in the South. Bolds well for Kelly and Masto, then.

How does this compare to 2018, wb? (If that info is available...)
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,773


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2848 on: October 14, 2022, 10:18:34 AM »

Washington Post-Ipsos poll of Latino voters finds D+27 on the GCB, 63-36.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/14/hispanic-voters-democrats/

Also says Dems have huge leads in Midwest, West, and Northeast, but only up by 9 in the South. Bolds well for Kelly and Masto, then.

That is not good news for RGV Dems though. Also that overall number I believe is basically the 2020 result with Hispanics
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,228


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2849 on: October 14, 2022, 10:21:14 AM »

Washington Post-Ipsos poll of Latino voters finds D+27 on the GCB, 63-36.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/14/hispanic-voters-democrats/

Also says Dems have huge leads in Midwest, West, and Northeast, but only up by 9 in the South. Bolds well for Kelly and Masto, then.

That is not good news for RGV Dems though. Also that overall number I believe is basically the 2020 result with Hispanics


Would coincide with the numerous other evidence that this is close to a "neutral" year that is approaching 2020-ish.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 ... 157  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 12 queries.