IA-Monmouth: Biden+3/5

[woodley park]

There definitely appears to be inverse relationship between how hard a state is getting hit by COVID, and its support for Trump. As COVID cases jumped, Trump's prospects took a hit in Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, and now Iowa.

[Roronoa D. Law]

You love to see it.

[Illiniwek]

What is the price of a NUT in Iowa??

[TrendsareUsuallyReal]

Needless to say, if Iowa is going for Biden, then he is probably also winning Texas, Georgia and possibly Ohio.

[Hope For A New Era]

Self-reported party ID is R+9.

omg

There definitely appears to be inverse relationship between how hard a state is getting hit by COVID, and its support for Trump. As COVID cases jumped, Trump's prospects took a hit in Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, and now Iowa.

Glad I'm not the only one who has noticed this. Texas too - at the height of the Texas surge we saw polls showing Biden +2 and +3. Could also explain the weirdly close Missouri polls lately.

[Liberalrocks]

Good for Trump !

[Bootes Void]

I'm chewing on some almonds while reading this poll

[Rand]

I think we need to bring this back.

OOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH  YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!

Use sparingly, then unleash on November 3rd.

[Lief 🗽]

New Poll: Iowa President by Monmouth University on 2020-10-19

Summary: D: 50%, R: 47%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Buzz]

Monmouth - Atlas' favorite GOLD STANDARD polling firm!  Well done!

[VAR]

Lol

[WD]

Lol

Lean D imo

[TiltsAreUnderrated]

Lol

Lean D imo

The data was not that much further off in IA than anywhere else, it seems. Greenfield got closer than Bullock, Bollier and Hegar, despite much hype to the contrary.

[ElectionsGuy]

Nothing new here, just Monmouth being off by at least 10 points. Very typical of a high-quality pollster.

[TiltsAreUnderrated]

Nothing new here, just Monmouth being off by at least 10 points. Very typical of a high-quality pollster.

You were citing it before the election.

The polls failed big time, but it wasn’t unfair to consider Monmouth a decent pollster beforehand.

[ElectionsGuy]

Nothing new here, just Monmouth being off by at least 10 points. Very typical of a high-quality pollster.

You were citing it before the election.

The polls failed big time, but it wasn’t unfair to consider Monmouth a decent pollster beforehand.

[TiltsAreUnderrated]

Nothing new here, just Monmouth being off by at least 10 points. Very typical of a high-quality pollster.

You were citing it before the election.

The polls failed big time, but it wasn’t unfair to consider Monmouth a decent pollster beforehand.

To me, that implied you didn't consider it a particularly bad pollster prior the election. I agree it massively misfired but there wasn't much to fault with considering it amongst the better outfits prior to the election.