ABC/Washington Post: Minnesota - Biden +16 | Wisconsin - Biden +6 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 10, 2024, 04:32:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  ABC/Washington Post: Minnesota - Biden +16 | Wisconsin - Biden +6 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ABC/Washington Post: Minnesota - Biden +16 | Wisconsin - Biden +6  (Read 5240 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« on: September 16, 2020, 05:22:29 AM »

https://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1216a12020StateBattlegrounds-WIMN.pdf

September 8-13

MN
615 likely voters
MoE: 4.5% for likely voters

Biden 57%
Trump 41%
Neither 1%
Other 0% (but some voters)
Would not vote 0% (no voters)
No opinion 1%

WI
605 likely voters
MoE: 4.5% for likely voters

Biden 52%
Trump 46%
Neither 1%
Other 0% (but some voters)
Would not vote 0% (no voters)
No opinion 1%

These 0% for neither/other/etc are beautiful sight to see
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2020, 05:24:25 AM »

Minnesota number won’t be anywhere close to reality.  Anyways terrible polling day for the Incumbent.

Interesting that state polls have clearly gotten better for Biden while national polls got marginally worse.

I thought the same thing, but I guess we haven't gotten a *ton* of high quality national polling lately besides Fox. YouGov has been stable, we'll see today...
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2020, 05:49:54 AM »

Dave Wasserman asks what this string of good polls in WI and MN means for Iowa.

Yeah, I feel like we're due for a new Selzer poll. They've kind of been slacking, we hvaen't gotten anything from them since like June
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2020, 06:53:23 AM »

I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought this framing was absurd. Whoever wrote this write up really doing a LOT to make it seem like a 6 pt difference is somehow tied

Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2020, 10:49:49 AM »

Just a reminder, WaPo polls have a pretty great track record.

In 2016, they had Clinton winning VA by 6. She won by 5.
In 2018, they had Wexton leading VA10 by 11 and 13. She won by 12.
In 2016, they had Clinton winning nationally by 3, she won by 2.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,383


« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2020, 10:56:14 AM »

Just a reminder, WaPo polls have a pretty great track record.

In 2016, they had Clinton winning VA by 6. She won by 5.
In 2018, they had Wexton leading VA10 by 11 and 13. She won by 12.
In 2016, they had Clinton winning nationally by 3, she won by 2.

Counterpoint: VA and VA10 are among the most overeducated states and CDs, respectively, and the national result in 2016 was thrown off by lopsided margins in California. Show me their record in areas with a lot of working class white voters.

I mean, I can go through and find more but you're also ignoring the fact that they got the margin practically 100% correct *nationally* as well in 2016
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.