PPP (Iowa): Ernst +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:03:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  PPP (Iowa): Ernst +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP (Iowa): Ernst +1  (Read 2671 times)
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« on: May 04, 2020, 09:10:02 AM »

Lean R, this is more competitive that Atlas admits, but Ernst is still an undeniable favorite, and this is way closer to Likely than tossup. Honestly, I’d prefer that Democrats don’t invest too much here, as this one is basically a reach race.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2020, 12:36:15 PM »

Lean R, this is more competitive that Atlas admits, but Ernst is still an undeniable favorite, and this is way closer to Likely than tossup. Honestly, I’d prefer that Democrats don’t invest too much here, as this one is basically a reach race.

I’m confused...

I mean that it's not Likely/Safe R, and it is competitive, but at the same time it's Lean R, and Ernst is a definite favorite, just not an overwhelming one.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2020, 11:46:22 AM »

43 to 42 for Ernst and 47 to 43 for McConnell is bad for their reelection prospects 😍😍😍

Sen Greenfield and Sen McGrath

It tilts R, but not Solid R, Dems know the difference

I'm sorry but KY isn't flipping, I think after 2008 and 2014 the lesson was learned that KY is Safe R
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.