Who is more electable?

[Bidenworth2020]

Harris

[History505]

Harris.

[GP270watch]

 Warren, I think Harris is fool's gold.

[Podgy the Bear]

Harris—but I doubt either one can be elected.

[Suburbia]

Warren, she is a white woman with no baggage like Hillary.

The Willie Brown thing will come back to haunt Harris, probably.

[Rookie Yinzer]

Toss-Up.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Warren has more appeal to poor whites, so her.

[Canis]

Warren has more appeal to poor whites, so her.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Oh please. The answer is John Delaney. He promised to only pursue policies both Democrats and Republicans can agree on. How can you counter such an universal appeal?

[History505]

Oh please. The answer is John Delaney. He promised to only pursue policies both Democrats and Republicans can agree on. How can you counter such an universal appeal?

Girl, you are so on.

[Beet]

I'll make somewhat of a bold position and say that both of them are eminently electable.

[henster]

Warren beat a popular incumbent Senator and actually ran against a Republican in her last election. Remember Harris didn't even have a Republican opponent for her Senate race and barely won her first term as AG in Cali.

[Politician]

Warren has more appeal to poor whites, so her.

[SaneDemocrat]

But Harris can mobilize "resistance moms" more.She is more cosmopolitan.

Think of Harris as Rubio and Warren as Cruz.

[SN2903]

Both are weak candidates, but Harris just due to the fact her positions are more moderate.

[Medal506]

But Harris can mobilize "resistance moms" more.She is more cosmopolitan.

Think of Harris as Rubio and Warren as Cruz.

I would actually think of Harris as Rubio, Warren as Rand Paul, and Bernie Sanders as Ted Cruz

[Medal506]

Probably Harris as she’s more likable than Warren.

[Ilhan Apologist]

Probably Harris, but I'm still supporting Warren.

[SN2903]

Probably Harris as she’s more likable than Warren.

That isn't saying much

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Warren if only because she's a bit less woke.

[EJ24]

Easily Harris.

Charisma is an important aspect of electability, and Kamala comes off as relatable and likeable, whereas Warren had the infamous beergate video. Absolute nuclear levels of cringe and reeks of pandering.

It's the difference between Barack Obama and John Kerry, in my opinion.

[Progressive Pessimist]

Easily Harris.

Charisma is an important aspect of electability, and Kamala comes off as relatable and likeable, whereas Warren had the infamous beergate video. Absolute nuclear levels of cringe and reeks of pandering.

It's the difference between Barack Obama and John Kerry, in my opinion.

Minus the whole "beergate" point. I give Harris the edge for this reason too. I don't think anyone will care about Warren's video by the time the general election comes if she's the nominee.

That's not to say that Warren can't enthuse voters either. It's just a different kind of style of doing so than Harris'.

[Podgy the Bear]

Easily Harris.

Charisma is an important aspect of electability, and Kamala comes off as relatable and likeable, whereas Warren had the infamous beergate video. Absolute nuclear levels of cringe and reeks of pandering.

It's the difference between Barack Obama and John Kerry, in my opinion.

Kamala Harris is no Barack Obama.

[Beet]

Warren has the highest post debate favorables in the field and is doing 4-5 times better among those closely following the race. She'll do just fine on the likeable front.

[Del Tachi]

Warren has more appeal to poor whites, so her.
Kamala can turn out more minority voters in inner-city Detroit and Philly, so her.

FTFY.

The lack of minority outreach in Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign was astounding.  She won the South handily against Sanders in the primary and just assumed, with Obama's blessing, that she'd be guaranteed his levels of support among Blacks in pivotal states like Michigan, Florida and Pennsylvania.  I can't see Harris making this same sort of mistake, whereas Warren might be an anathema to Black voters.