IA-SEN 2020: Ernst megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 07:25:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  IA-SEN 2020: Ernst megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 37
Author Topic: IA-SEN 2020: Ernst megathread  (Read 65452 times)
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: February 25, 2019, 03:02:59 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well there is no guarantee of when that year will occur.  Really the only time having a member from a vulnerable House seat run for Senate ever works out is in a midterm of an opposing party President. 
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: February 25, 2019, 03:04:26 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

That would also make the most geographic sense.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: February 25, 2019, 03:10:03 PM »

She’s obviously more likely to win reelection than to beat Ernst. I’d say Finkenauer is slightly more vulnerable than Axne in 2020 but both House races will be highly contested.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: February 25, 2019, 03:27:13 PM »
« Edited: February 25, 2019, 03:35:17 PM by Mr.Phips »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.

The DCCC should be sitting down with these members showing them polls that  show that they can’t win the Senate race they are looking at.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: February 25, 2019, 03:31:57 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.
lol at you comparing ME and IA in a presidential year to LA and IN in a massive R wave midterm year.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: February 25, 2019, 03:33:53 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.
lol at you comparing ME and IA in a presidential year to LA and IN in a massive R wave midterm year.

Trump may still win Iowa and Ernst is fairly popular.  Collins is still popular and leads generic D (which believe me always performs better than any actual D).
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: February 25, 2019, 03:40:28 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.

The DCCC should be sitting down with these members showing them polls that  show that they can’t win the Senate race they are looking at.

You do not know what you are talking about at all if you think Jared Golden would have a 100% chance of losing a Senate race and a 50% chance or greater of winning re-election instead.

Do you really believe that Trump will carry ME-02 by a wide margin again?
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: February 25, 2019, 03:55:30 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.

The DCCC should be sitting down with these members showing them polls that  show that they can’t win the Senate race they are looking at.

You do not know what you are talking about at all if you think Jared Golden would have a 100% chance of losing a Senate race and a 50% chance or greater of winning re-election instead.

Do you really believe that Trump will carry ME-02 by a wide margin again?

Is the Pope Catholic? To make my point more clear:

If a Democratic House member sits in a R+ PVI House seat that’s not trending dramatically left (like the OC seats with misleading PVI’s), there’s something like a 90% chance they will lose re-election in the next R wave. Thus it would behoove that Congressperson to run for Senate or higher office at their first opportunity if they want to continue their political careers. Because it’s very rare to find House members become entrenched in tough terrain.

It usually doesn’t work to run for Senate from a tough House seat.  Again, the only person I can think of who it worked out for is Jackie Rosen and it was in a wave year for her party.  Do you really believe Axne can win statewide in Iowa if Trump is carrying the state?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: February 25, 2019, 04:38:49 PM »

Axne and Finkenauer are in the situation where their best hope of long term survival is for Trump to narrowly win re-election (preferably while the Democratic nominee narrowly carries their districts.)

It reminds me of McSally who is in deep sh*t due to having to run in two consectutive cycles, one of which is likely to be a decent year for Democrats.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,446
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: February 25, 2019, 11:20:41 PM »

Running Axne or Finkenauer is not smart. Democrats should really just run Tom Miller here, if he loses, Democrats should then cede Iowa to the GOP, they way that the GOP should cede VA and maybe CO to the Dems. Also this idea that Golden or Finkenauer or any House freshman will beat a popular Senate incumbent is unreasonable. Taking down Senate incumbents requires experience.
Logged
Hatchet
Luthera
Rookie
**
Posts: 16


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: February 25, 2019, 11:39:52 PM »

Iowa is gone for Democrats. It is the new Nebraska. The state doesn't have any large Democratic strongholds like Wisconsin or Michigan to tilt the state to the left. It is a mostly rural, less educated state with no clear path for Democrats to win. We all know the rural areas don't vote Democrat anymore. Sad.
Logged
Perlen vor den Schweinen
kongress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 973
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: February 26, 2019, 01:50:45 AM »

I am loving these posts saying Iowa is an impossible lift for Democrats nowadays. It has several urban centers, and the liberal turnout in 2016 was utterly abysmal, making it appear more Republican than one may think. The user PAK Man said that Iowa just really hated Hillary Clinton; they didn't love Trump. You can see that through his approval ratings in Iowa.

It's also over a year before we really start to get a clear picture of what will be happening. People thought Iowa was solidly in the bag for Democrats in 2016 at this point in the cycle in 2015. That was after Iowa Democrats had one of their most disastrous midterms ever.

Now Iowa Democrats hold 3/4 of the US House seats and a good chunk of the statewide offices that were up in 2018, only losing some narrowly. That does not scream "dead" to me.

Tom Miller would be a bad candidate because a. he's old and probably doesn't want to be a Senator b. I would guess he has never had to seriously campaign with how abnormal his landslides are. There are plenty of options: remember, Bart Brentley was also considered unbeatably titanium despite the impending six year itch and Joni Ernst was just some Some Dude State Senator who castrated pigs.

Of course, Boblark stuck his foot in his mouth when he insulted farmers along with that clown Grassley, who is a saint of Iowa (and the Windsor Heights Dairy Queen). Ernst had it easy from there. Democrats could potentially whip a candidate out of nowhere and still have success, as long as said some dude candidate is a farmer.

Now Ernst has to run on being a Trump lackey in a state he is divisive in. Can she be beaten? Yeah, Democrats have a lot of potential factors going for them - and as said before, things can change greatly.

Atlas Democrats are writing this seat off far too soon, refusing to think of possibilities. Or the variable future. But what else is new? Blue Texas, apparently?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,530
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: February 26, 2019, 02:24:21 AM »

Ernst can be reelected and Dems can win state with Kamala-Brown ticket. Dems dont necessarily have to win all 3, VA, IA or OH, but those three have predicted the right winnet in 4/5 elections.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,268
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: February 26, 2019, 09:15:02 AM »

Axne would be the second-worst choice after Hubbell in my opinion. She reminds me a lot of him, a policy wonk with absolutely no charisma. That's not a combination that can win Iowa.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: February 26, 2019, 09:54:46 AM »

Axne would be the second-worst choice after Hubbell in my opinion. She reminds me a lot of him, a policy wonk with absolutely no charisma. That's not a combination that can win Iowa.

To be fair, this description pretty much fits Tom Vilsack as well.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,403
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #240 on: February 26, 2019, 09:58:36 AM »

Running Axne or Finkenauer is not smart. Democrats should really just run Tom Miller here, if he loses, Democrats should then cede Iowa to the GOP, they way that the GOP should cede VA and maybe CO to the Dems. Also this idea that Golden or Finkenauer or any House freshman will beat a popular Senate incumbent is unreasonable. Taking down Senate incumbents requires experience.

Yes taking down Senate incumbents requires all the experience that seasoned campaigners have developed over many years, like Rosen, Cotton, Ron Johnson, Mike Braun, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Cory Gardner, Elizabeth Warren, Al Franken, Maggie Hassan, Kay Hagan, Thom tillis, Jeff Merkley

Not to mention Ernst herself
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,268
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #241 on: February 26, 2019, 11:27:25 AM »

Running Axne or Finkenauer is not smart. Democrats should really just run Tom Miller here, if he loses, Democrats should then cede Iowa to the GOP, they way that the GOP should cede VA and maybe CO to the Dems. Also this idea that Golden or Finkenauer or any House freshman will beat a popular Senate incumbent is unreasonable. Taking down Senate incumbents requires experience.

Yes taking down Senate incumbents requires all the experience that seasoned campaigners have developed over many years, like Rosen, Cotton, Ron Johnson, Mike Braun, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Cory Gardner, Elizabeth Warren, Al Franken, Maggie Hassan, Kay Hagan, Thom tillis, Jeff Merkley

Not to mention Ernst herself

Bruce Braley was not an incumbent.
Logged
Seattle
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 786
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #242 on: February 26, 2019, 01:44:31 PM »

Running Axne or Finkenauer is not smart. Democrats should really just run Tom Miller here, if he loses, Democrats should then cede Iowa to the GOP, they way that the GOP should cede VA and maybe CO to the Dems. Also this idea that Golden or Finkenauer or any House freshman will beat a popular Senate incumbent is unreasonable. Taking down Senate incumbents requires experience.

Yes taking down Senate incumbents requires all the experience that seasoned campaigners have developed over many years, like Rosen, Cotton, Ron Johnson, Mike Braun, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Cory Gardner, Elizabeth Warren, Al Franken, Maggie Hassan, Kay Hagan, Thom tillis, Jeff Merkley

Not to mention Ernst herself

Bruce Braley was not an incumbent.
I think you mean Bob Barley.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,840
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #243 on: February 27, 2019, 01:34:58 AM »

Axne would be the second-worst choice after Hubbell in my opinion. She reminds me a lot of him, a policy wonk with absolutely no charisma. That's not a combination that can win Iowa.

would you rather run a deranged loon like glasson?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #244 on: February 27, 2019, 12:38:11 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://cbs2iowa.com/news/local/sen-liz-mathis-meets-with-democrats-in-dc-to-talk-about-2020-senate-race
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,530
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #245 on: February 27, 2019, 03:38:50 PM »

IA is clearly a competetive state and Ernst like Gardner won an upset
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,781


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #246 on: February 27, 2019, 04:48:41 PM »


Not a good idea at all.  This isn’t like Nevada in 2018 where Heller was already dead meat due to it being Trumps midterm. Ernst is pretty popular in a state where Trump could still very well win.  I see this as more likely to be a Patrick Murphy 2016 sitauation then a Jackie Rosen 2018 situation.

Well she’d probably lose her House seat in the next Republican leaning year anyway. Which should make it much less of a risk to go for Senate. Jared Golden is in a similar situation

Well, redistricting is most likely to make the district all metro Des Moines probably with Story attached, so if she could make it to 2022 it's a pretty safe seat.

I guess, but that’s not guaranteed. In any case, a Democratic House member sitting in an EVEN or R+ PVI seat is almost always going to be better off going for the more valuable Senate in a potentially competitive state. Like Finkenauer, Golden, Cunningham, etc.



So basically a 100% of losing versus a 50% chance.  All three of the above would have probably a 100% chance of losing senate races versus a better than 50% chance (except Cunningham) of keeping their House seat in 2020.  

Giving up a House seat where you have a chance (and possibly favored) at re-election versus a kamikaze Senate run is just stupid.  Look at Brad Ellsworth and Charlie Melancon in 2010.  They had zero chance at winning Senate races in their states with Obama in the White House yet ran and lost badly and had their careers ended.

The DCCC should be sitting down with these members showing them polls that  show that they can’t win the Senate race they are looking at.

Ellsworth and Melancon probably would have lost in 2010 if they ran for re-election, possibly by even more than they lost when they ran for Senate. The PVI of their Districts at the time was even more Republican than that of their state PVI.
Logged
PAK Man
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 752


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #247 on: February 28, 2019, 12:08:43 PM »

For what it's worth - and I haven't gone through every single page of this - I think Liz Mathis would be a great candidate for senate. But my dream candidate is J.D. Scholten.

Polling shows Ernst with high approval, but I do think she's vulnerable. Ernst looks good because she's very "folksy" and has rural Iowa appeal. But when you actually listen to her, you see how bad she actually is. Iowans, though, are willing to overlook that if you're a so-called "nice" person. Also, you have to be pro-ag. And I mean REALLY pro-ag.

Democrats would be smart to get somebody not from Des Moines. Oh rural Iowans hate Des Moines with a passion. They constantly see them as anti-farmer. I'm sure other states are like this (western Nebraska probably hates Omaha, and I know downstate Illinois people hate Chicago) but it just seems excessive here in Iowa.
Logged
Perlen vor den Schweinen
kongress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 973
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #248 on: February 28, 2019, 12:51:14 PM »

For what it's worth - and I haven't gone through every single page of this - I think Liz Mathis would be a great candidate for senate. But my dream candidate is J.D. Scholten.

Polling shows Ernst with high approval, but I do think she's vulnerable. Ernst looks good because she's very "folksy" and has rural Iowa appeal. But when you actually listen to her, you see how bad she actually is. Iowans, though, are willing to overlook that if you're a so-called "nice" person. Also, you have to be pro-ag. And I mean REALLY pro-ag.

Democrats would be smart to get somebody not from Des Moines. Oh rural Iowans hate Des Moines with a passion. They constantly see them as anti-farmer. I'm sure other states are like this (western Nebraska probably hates Omaha, and I know downstate Illinois people hate Chicago) but it just seems excessive here in Iowa.

The difference between the Western Nebraska vs. Omaha rivalry and the Iowa and Illinois rivalries is that Omaha does not have anywhere close to enough power to overwhelm Western Nebraska. As a result, we have the state perpetually run by angry rich white ranchers that probably think they will instadie if they step east of 72nd in Omaha.

In fact, there is only one Democrat in the legislature that represents anywhere in NE-03! He's in Grand Island.
Logged
PAK Man
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 752


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #249 on: February 28, 2019, 01:14:37 PM »

For what it's worth - and I haven't gone through every single page of this - I think Liz Mathis would be a great candidate for senate. But my dream candidate is J.D. Scholten.

Polling shows Ernst with high approval, but I do think she's vulnerable. Ernst looks good because she's very "folksy" and has rural Iowa appeal. But when you actually listen to her, you see how bad she actually is. Iowans, though, are willing to overlook that if you're a so-called "nice" person. Also, you have to be pro-ag. And I mean REALLY pro-ag.

Democrats would be smart to get somebody not from Des Moines. Oh rural Iowans hate Des Moines with a passion. They constantly see them as anti-farmer. I'm sure other states are like this (western Nebraska probably hates Omaha, and I know downstate Illinois people hate Chicago) but it just seems excessive here in Iowa.

The difference between the Western Nebraska vs. Omaha rivalry and the Iowa and Illinois rivalries is that Omaha does not have anywhere close to enough power to overwhelm Western Nebraska. As a result, we have the state perpetually run by angry rich white ranchers that probably think they will instadie if they step east of 72nd in Omaha.

In fact, there is only one Democrat in the legislature that represents anywhere in NE-03! He's in Grand Island.

Yeah I've never been outside of Omaha but I have friends from Nebraska and all they talk about is how outside of Omaha, there's virtually nothing.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 37  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 13 queries.