NJ-Quinnipiac: Menendez +7 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 09:02:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  NJ-Quinnipiac: Menendez +7 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NJ-Quinnipiac: Menendez +7  (Read 2700 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: October 17, 2018, 11:37:53 AM »

Hugin is more likely to win than Bredesen, O'Rourke, or Heitkamp.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2018, 11:46:05 AM »

Hugin is more likely to win than Bredesen, O'Rourke, or Heitkamp.

Hugin is less likely to win than all three, and it's not even close. Hugin hasn't even been close in recent polls and I'm confident undecideds are going to break hard for Menendez.

That said, it's a travesty that this race is so close.

Yes, Hugin hasn't been close in any recent reliable polls. Bredesen, O'Rourke, and Heitkamp haven't been close in any recent reliable polls either. I was more talking down their chances than talking up his.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2018, 11:56:52 AM »

Hugin is more likely to win than Bredesen, O'Rourke, or Heitkamp.
None of them are winning so who cares? That said you're still technically wrong, New Jersey is gonna New Jersey.

Far from a universal opinion, lol.

And Tennessee is gonna Tennessee, Texas is gonna Texas, and North Dakota is gonna North Dakota.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.