CT PPP: Lamont +5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 11:48:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  CT PPP: Lamont +5
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CT PPP: Lamont +5  (Read 1201 times)
TheRocketRaccoon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 761
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 15, 2018, 12:20:16 PM »

http://www.courant.com/politics/capitol-watch/hc-pol-ppp-poll-lamont-up-by-5-story.html

Lamont 43
Stefanowski 38

'The poll is similar to others that have the race as a single-digit battle between the two top contenders. Independent candidate Oz Griebel of Hartford was not mentioned in the poll results.'
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2018, 12:34:44 PM »

Pretty weak, but considering he's of the same party of a governor with 70% disapproval, it's actually not bad. This is somewhat the opposite of Oklahoma.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,614
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2018, 12:35:02 PM »

Everything is awful.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,586
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2018, 01:05:52 PM »

I wonder if the independent is pulling enough votes from Stefanowski so that Lamont wins with under 50% of the vote.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,168
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2018, 02:21:49 PM »

Why is Muhloy so deeply underwater? Even Ned is running away as fast he can from this guy.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2018, 02:31:32 PM »

I expect Ned to win now, but keep in mind this was how much Foley was down by on average in 2010 and 2014 and he still only narrowly lost both. Taking into account Oz seemingly being on the upsurge, and I wouldn't be surprised if this is closer than we think.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2018, 02:31:56 PM »

^lol

Anyway, Safe D, obviously.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2018, 02:32:51 PM »

Why is Muhloy so deeply underwater? Even Ned is running away as fast he can from this guy.

He's borked budget after budget year after year and there's the perception that he does nothing but raise taxes and waste money. Remember: CT is Democratic because of social issues. Fiscally, it's rather moderate, a remnant of its GOP past.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2018, 02:33:59 PM »


Not safe. I'd say Lean, closer to Likely than Tossup. Remember, in governor races, Republicans tend to be underpolled. Again, I'm going in expecting a Lamont win, but it won't be by a margin that would constitute calling it Safe.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,306
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2018, 03:13:03 PM »

Lamont isn't Muhloy, what else is new? Likely D.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.