NYT LIVE POLL THREAD:
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:40:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NYT LIVE POLL THREAD:
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 83
Poll
Question: How would you rate the NYT/Siena House polls methodology
#1
A: Freedom Methodology
 
#2
B
 
#3
C
 
#4
D
 
#5
F: Horrible Methodology
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 139

Author Topic: NYT LIVE POLL THREAD:  (Read 138530 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,365
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: September 08, 2018, 12:16:20 PM »

I hate the way 538 is handling these live polls. They seem to be entering them every day as completely separate data points. That means that KY-06 will likely go into their model as three different polls despite the fact that over a fifth of the voters will be the same throughout. Also, Sienna (the company doing the polling) is saying pretty clearly that, unless the polls have over 500 responses, they are not finished. It seems to me like a poor practice on 538's part.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls

I sent feedback to 538 about the KY-06 poll being included with a sample size of 164, and got a response this morning: "...we're updating any Siena/Upshot poll once its sample size is over 150. Then we put in the finished poll once it's done."

This is ridiculous. I can't believe that people at 538 don't know better.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: September 08, 2018, 12:19:10 PM »

I hate the way 538 is handling these live polls. They seem to be entering them every day as completely separate data points. That means that KY-06 will likely go into their model as three different polls despite the fact that over a fifth of the voters will be the same throughout. Also, Sienna (the company doing the polling) is saying pretty clearly that, unless the polls have over 500 responses, they are not finished. It seems to me like a poor practice on 538's part.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls

I sent feedback to 538 about the KY-06 poll being included with a sample size of 164, and got a response this morning: "...we're updating any Siena/Upshot poll once its sample size is over 150. Then we put in the finished poll once it's done."

This is ridiculous. I can't believe that people at 538 don't know better.
Nate Silver is extremely bitter at NYT. It’s just people trying to ingratiate themselves with the boss.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,365
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: September 08, 2018, 12:23:19 PM »

I hate the way 538 is handling these live polls. They seem to be entering them every day as completely separate data points. That means that KY-06 will likely go into their model as three different polls despite the fact that over a fifth of the voters will be the same throughout. Also, Sienna (the company doing the polling) is saying pretty clearly that, unless the polls have over 500 responses, they are not finished. It seems to me like a poor practice on 538's part.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls

I sent feedback to 538 about the KY-06 poll being included with a sample size of 164, and got a response this morning: "...we're updating any Siena/Upshot poll once its sample size is over 150. Then we put in the finished poll once it's done."

This is ridiculous. I can't believe that people at 538 don't know better.
Nate Silver is extremely bitter at NYT. It’s just people trying to ingratiate themselves with the boss.

How does entering polls wrong in their database hurt the NYT in any way? It only hurts 538 since it risks skewing their forecasts.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,909


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: September 08, 2018, 12:38:06 PM »

Dems are gaining at the moment in MN-03. Paulsen's lead is down to 49-46, up to 116 respondents.
Logged
ltomlinson31
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: September 08, 2018, 12:44:25 PM »

Dems are gaining at the moment in MN-03. Paulsen's lead is down to 49-46, up to 116 respondents.

What a surge by Phillips!

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: September 08, 2018, 12:54:01 PM »

XINGKERUI Ratings Change Projection

MN-03: Likely R to Toss-Up
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,911


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: September 08, 2018, 12:56:00 PM »

Barr holding onto +1 in KY-06 as its probably going to end soon. 502 respondents right now.

Amy has a 51/38 favorable while Barr only 47/45. Trump's approval is actually -6 in this district (wow) and people want Dems to take the house by +2, so I'd expect the undecideds to break for McGrath in this case.

What I'm confused about though is in the "Our poll under different weighting schemes" section. In all weighting models, they have McGrath leading, by 3, 2, and 2. Yet their final "estimate" is Barr +1. I am confusion.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,132


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: September 08, 2018, 01:02:48 PM »

Logged
McGovernForPrez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,073


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: September 08, 2018, 01:10:38 PM »

I wonder why the response rate in Minnesota is so much higher compared to all the districts polled so far? It's only take them 8000 calls to get about 300 responses which is much better than all the other districts polled.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,365
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: September 08, 2018, 01:19:04 PM »



That's actually a good point.
Logged
Predictor
TWRAddict
Rookie
**
Posts: 159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: September 08, 2018, 02:25:07 PM »

Some districts I hope they poll next:
  • AZ-02
  • CO-03
  • CO-06
  • MI-11
  • MN-01
  • MN-02
  • MN-07
  • WV-03
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: September 08, 2018, 02:50:23 PM »

These polls aren't actually that interesting if they are all just weighted to show up as virtual ties.
Logged
wesmoorenerd
westroopnerd
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,600
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: September 08, 2018, 02:54:04 PM »

MN-03 and MN-08 both tied at 47 and 43 each respectively. Gun to my head, Dems win both, although that may be my bias talking because I really like both Phillips and Radinovich.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,132


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: September 08, 2018, 02:57:32 PM »

MN-03 and MN-08 both tied at 47 and 43 each respectively. Gun to my head, Dems win both, although that may be my bias talking because I really like both Phillips and Radinovich.

As soon as you posted that, they both moved off the tie to D+1. Smiley
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: September 08, 2018, 02:58:07 PM »

These polls aren't actually that interesting if they are all just weighted to show up as virtual ties.

That's a good point. It would be pretty suspicious if literally every poll showed a result within 1 or 2%.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,132


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: September 08, 2018, 03:02:36 PM »

These polls aren't actually that interesting if they are all just weighted to show up as virtual ties.

That's a good point. It would be pretty suspicious if literally every poll showed a result within 1 or 2%.

Well, they are polling highly competitive districts so far.  It's not that surprising.

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: September 08, 2018, 03:16:08 PM »

WV-03 is coming up next.
Logged
BundouYMB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: September 08, 2018, 03:27:44 PM »

Phillips is +3 right now, but among people who are certain to vote he's +10. Similar story for Radinovich, who's +2 overall but +4 among those certain to vote. The switch to likely voters is going to hit Republicans like a truck this year.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,256


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: September 08, 2018, 03:50:23 PM »

These polls aren't actually that interesting if they are all just weighted to show up as virtual ties.

That's a good point. It would be pretty suspicious if literally every poll showed a result within 1 or 2%.

Well, they are polling highly competitive districts so far.  It's not that surprising.



Even if every district were in fact tied, sampling error should produce a larger range of results.  If you saw six polls of the same race that were all within the 1% of each other, you would start to suspect herding, often through manipulating the weights to achieve a certain balance in the turnout model.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: September 08, 2018, 04:22:53 PM »

It's funny how fast these change. Last night Paulsen and Radinovich were dominating, and now both races are close.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,337


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: September 08, 2018, 04:38:56 PM »

These polls aren't actually that interesting if they are all just weighted to show up as virtual ties.

That's a good point. It would be pretty suspicious if literally every poll showed a result within 1 or 2%.

Well, they are polling highly competitive districts so far.  It's not that surprising.



Even if every district were in fact tied, sampling error should produce a larger range of results.  If you saw six polls of the same race that were all within the 1% of each other, you would start to suspect herding, often through manipulating the weights to achieve a certain balance in the turnout model.

Exactly. I brought this up earlier. It's suspicious even with just four polls. If each of the races is exactly tied in reality, we should still be seeing some results with sizeable leads for one candidate or another. Instead, we have four polls that are each within 1%. (If you look at the numbers without rounding, all four finished polls show results with a less than 1-point margin.) That's statistically very improbable.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: September 08, 2018, 05:03:42 PM »


STRAIGHT OUTTA BECKLEY boyz!!!!

here is the link for the results, none in yet though

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/upshot/elections-poll-wv03-1.html
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: September 08, 2018, 05:07:56 PM »

Phillips is starting to get a lead and doing well with moderates and undecideds, not a large lead, not a large sampling, but slightly out of the range of statistical insignificance which is notable at least in my book.
Logged
Florida Man for Crime
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,909


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: September 08, 2018, 05:09:48 PM »

Phillips up 49-44 over Paulsen in MN-03 now (378 respondents). Looking a bit more like a burbstomping now. Will the momentary fluctuation of Phillips' lead hold up?
Logged
nerd73
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -7.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: September 08, 2018, 05:22:56 PM »

So WV-03 is starting. I'm sure this will be interesting.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 83  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 8 queries.