Congressional Primary Results Megathread: AR, GA, KY & TX (Runoff) - May 22
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 07:41:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Congressional Primary Results Megathread: AR, GA, KY & TX (Runoff) - May 22
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 77
Author Topic: Congressional Primary Results Megathread: AR, GA, KY & TX (Runoff) - May 22  (Read 111527 times)
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: March 07, 2018, 02:14:59 AM »

I know Texas isn't likely to turn blue this year (or in the next couple), but Hillary was able to get Trump down to the single digits in Texas in 2016, so I'm pulling for Beto to at least do that.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: March 07, 2018, 02:17:17 AM »

I know Texas isn't likely to turn blue this year (or in the next couple), but Hillary was able to get Trump down to the single digits in Texas in 2016, so I'm pulling for Beto to at least do that.

It's probably more accurate to say that Trump got Trump down to single digits in Texas.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: March 07, 2018, 02:20:14 AM »

From another forum:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,907


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: March 07, 2018, 02:21:36 AM »

I've been repeatedly saying Cruz by 5-7 for months, and I stand by that. A result around 53-46 in November is what I'm expecting.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: March 07, 2018, 02:27:33 AM »

Well, I guess that's all we're gonna get tonight.  Maybe those counties not reporting will get a computer or phone for the fall.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,032


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: March 07, 2018, 02:30:47 AM »

I've been repeatedly saying Cruz by 5-7 for months, and I stand by that. A result around 53-46 in November is what I'm expecting.

46 would be quite a feat, Dem ceiling seems to be 44.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: March 07, 2018, 03:07:01 AM »

Well, I guess that's all we're gonna get tonight.  Maybe those counties not reporting will get a computer or phone for the fall.

A big increase in reporting came in about half hour after you posted this.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,538
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: March 07, 2018, 03:42:13 AM »

I wish our moderator clown car was capable of doing something about these trashy spammers.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: March 07, 2018, 03:55:50 AM »

7 votes between the candidates in the 23rd district for a spot in the runoff with 28 precincts remaining. The justice democrat here might squeak into the runoff.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,031
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: March 07, 2018, 04:50:19 AM »

At long last, the final projection can be made:

District 23
Democratic Primary

Percent   Candidate   Votes   Winner
41.4%   Gina Jones   17,939   
17.4%   Rick Trevino   7,548   

17.2%   Judy Canales   7,454   
15.1%   Jay Hulings   6,541   
9%   Angie Villescaz   3,900   
332/348 precincts reporting

The next primary is in Illinois on March 20.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,964
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: March 07, 2018, 06:21:58 AM »

Why did O Rourke only get 62% against two unknown candidates?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: March 07, 2018, 08:10:45 AM »

Democrats really didn't do that bad last night:


Source

Guess what?!? The early vote in TX's 15 largest counties were predictive!

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Suburan Democrats are pumped to vote!

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: March 07, 2018, 08:11:50 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.
Logged
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: March 07, 2018, 08:57:26 AM »

Why did O Rourke only get 62% against two unknown candidates?

Maybe identity played a part? Beto is white, Sema Hernandez is Latina, and Edward Kimbrough is Black. I could be wrong, though. Just a guess.
Logged
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: March 07, 2018, 09:00:06 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.

I honestly believe that had the DCCC not intervened, Moser and Westin would have switched places. Before the DCCC dump, the Westin campaign was certain it would be Fletcher vs Westin.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,235


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: March 07, 2018, 09:03:37 AM »

Why did O Rourke only get 62% against two unknown candidates?

Beto is pretty unknown to a lot of the state as well. Just because he has Atlas hype doesn't mean he is very well known, lol. Notice how he got 90% of the vote in his heavily Latino home county and almost 90% in Travis county.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: March 07, 2018, 09:14:04 AM »


Source
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: March 07, 2018, 09:28:46 AM »

So I finally woke up, so here is my take on the final results:

Statewide, democrats got about 1,037,000 to 1,541,000 reps in the senate and 1,017,000 to 1,538,000 reps in the governors race. Last two senate races were 497,487 to 1,406,648 in 2012, and 510,009 to 1,314,556 in 2014. The 2014 governor race - which was hyped to death for gain whatsoever, was 554,014 to 1,337,875. So, a ration change from about 1:2.5 or 3, to now 1:1.5. So even though dems didn't win (who honestly was expecting this? you should be fired) they did double their primary numbers. Overall, it isn't anything to suggest a huge change in the Texan political lean, but it is enough to continue to justify a Likely R rating for the senate rather than Safe R.

Housewise, the three main house races are all things to write home about on the dem side, though each in their own way. TX 23 is obviously the shining star, what with Hispanic participation in the primary through the roof. Democrats easily trounced Reps here, which bodes well for hispanic activism in the fall. In 2016, dems and reps in TX 23 we about exactly even in the primary totals, with dems beating reps by just 500 votes.  TX-07 and TX-32 are also signs of continued competativeness. For reference,  TX-07 in 2016 was 24,190 votes for the dem to 77,300 votes for the rep in the primary. TX-32 did not have a dem candidate. Both races saw the dems come within a hairs distance of the Rs, which easily signals competative races in the rest of the year. TX-02, TX-06, and TX-21 meanwhile didn't show any signs of upsets in favor of a democratic seat-warmer, so that is something reps can be happy about.

Finally, Dems also have a hispanic problem in the Texas primaries. I hate to use the term "low-info voters," but it is pretty clear from these results across the ticket that south-Texas will always vote for whomever has the most Hispanic-sounding name, even if they are a nobody.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: March 07, 2018, 09:37:23 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.

I honestly believe that had the DCCC not intervened, Moser and Westin would have switched places. Before the DCCC dump, the Westin campaign was certain it would be Fletcher vs Westin.

Yup. Hopefully they learned their lesson after this debacle. Westin was a solid progressive without all Moser’s baggage

As for everything else... there’s some positive signs here. I think 2-4 House seats is a reasonable target, and we could have some success in the State House too (it won’t flip, though). That being said, Beto has a lot of work to do, though that’s less of a function of being a Democrat and more him being from an isolated part of the state that has a terrible record producing statewide candidates, let alone victors
Logged
DemocraticKing
Rookie
**
Posts: 92


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: March 07, 2018, 09:44:53 AM »

Why did O Rourke only get 62% against two unknown candidates?

Maybe identity played a part? Beto is white, Sema Hernandez is Latina, and Edward Kimbrough is Black. I could be wrong, though. Just a guess.

This is literally all this is. Beto's name rec is low, so people identity vote. The "Justice Dem" type Sema Hernandez winning Latino blue dog land in South Texas proves this point wonderfully. Kimbrough carried African American areas as well.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,067


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: March 07, 2018, 09:49:26 AM »

Why did O Rourke only get 62% against two unknown candidates?

Maybe identity played a part? Beto is white, Sema Hernandez is Latina, and Edward Kimbrough is Black. I could be wrong, though. Just a guess.

This is literally all this is. Beto's name rec is low, so people identity vote. The "Justice Dem" type Sema Hernandez winning Latino blue dog land in South Texas proves this point wonderfully. Kimbrough carried African American areas as well.

Yep, this is pretty much it.



Dallas county - O'Rourke Blue, Kimbrough Green, Hernandez Red.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: March 07, 2018, 09:52:48 AM »

Some more maps from Miles:





Source

Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,760
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: March 07, 2018, 10:26:09 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.

I honestly believe that had the DCCC not intervened, Moser and Westin would have switched places. Before the DCCC dump, the Westin campaign was certain it would be Fletcher vs Westin.

I’m honestly pretty skeptical that the opposition research dump had much of an impact one way or the other.  I’m also not convinced that Moser has a realistic chance of winning the run-off, but we shall see.  On the bright side, I’m feeling much more optimistic about our chances of unseating Hurd and Sessions than I had been before the primary (especially Hurd).
Logged
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: March 07, 2018, 10:40:07 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.

I honestly believe that had the DCCC not intervened, Moser and Westin would have switched places. Before the DCCC dump, the Westin campaign was certain it would be Fletcher vs Westin.

I’m honestly pretty skeptical that the opposition research dump had much of an impact one way or the other.  I’m also not convinced that Moser has a realistic chance of winning the run-off, but we shall see.  On the bright side, I’m feeling much more optimistic about our chances of unseating Hurd and Sessions than I had been before the primary (especially Hurd).

Apparently there was a noticeable uptick for Moser in election day voting vs early voting and absentee voting and Westin led Moser in absentee voting: https://www.vox.com/2018/3/7/17084808/dccc-laura-moser-texas-democratic-primary-2018
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: March 07, 2018, 10:54:30 AM »

So, if you are DCCC you can't be happy. And if you're a democrat you have to ask yourself how stupid are these people. Moser wouldn't head to the runoff if it wasn't for DCCC and now I think she has solid chance in a runoff too, cause the election day vote was essentialy tied.

It was a good night for progressives with Moser and probably Trevino heading to runoff.

The best result for Dems and the best chance for a pickup is TX-23. I don't see TX-07 flipping, they will have a good candidate in TX-32 but still this is lean R district. So, one pickup out of Texas looks the most reasonable outcome for now.

I honestly believe that had the DCCC not intervened, Moser and Westin would have switched places. Before the DCCC dump, the Westin campaign was certain it would be Fletcher vs Westin.

I’m honestly pretty skeptical that the opposition research dump had much of an impact one way or the other.  I’m also not convinced that Moser has a realistic chance of winning the run-off, but we shall see.  On the bright side, I’m feeling much more optimistic about our chances of unseating Hurd and Sessions than I had been before the primary (especially Hurd).

Apparently there was a noticeable uptick for Moser in election day voting vs early voting and absentee voting and Westin led Moser in absentee voting: https://www.vox.com/2018/3/7/17084808/dccc-laura-moser-texas-democratic-primary-2018
Yes the DCCC should be concerned with these primary. Democratic primary voters have always been known to be pragmatic and calculated. I hope the Our Revolution and Justice crowd don't hurt our chances this year.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 77  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 9 queries.