Which of the following should be ILLEGAL?

[KillerPollo]

Sexual Orientation :

A phrase that has come up recently in this earth is "sexual orientation." This is a phrase made up by fags to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex. "Sexual orientation," as used today, has nothing to do with sexual activity (yeah, right), but only refers to who or what a particular person is attracted to. If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure. If you're not going to discriminate based on "sexual orientation", then you must not discriminate against any of the following. And remember, if you discriminate against any of these, you're a hypocrite.

These "sexual orientations" are generally known as "paraphilias", and are mental disorders - just like homosexuality used to be.


here are what they (excluding homosexuality) mean:

Exhibitionism - involves people who are sexually aroused by the idea of exposing their genitals to a stranger.

Fetishism - involves people who are sexually aroused by nonliving objects.

Frotteurism - involves people who are sexually aroused by the idea of touching and rubbing against a nonconsenting person.

Paedophilia - involves people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent children (usually 13 years or younger).

Sexual Masochism - involves people who are sexually aroused by being "humiliated, beaten, bound, or otherwise made to suffer."

Sexual Sadism - involves people who are sexually aroused by causing the psychological or physical suffering of a victim (e.g., "restraint, blindfolding, paddling, spanking, whipping, pinching, beating, burning, electrical shocks, rape, cutting, stabbing, strangulation, torture, mutilation, or killing").

Transvestic Fetishism - involves people who are sexually aroused by cross-dressing.

Voyeurism - involves people who are sexually aroused by watching unsuspecting strangers have sex.

Telephone Scatologia - involves people who are sexually aroused by making obscene phone calls.

Necrophilia - involves people who are sexually attracted to corpses.

Partialism - involves people who are sexually attracted to exclusively one part of the body.

Zoophilia - involves people who are sexually attracted to animals.

Coprophilia - involves people who are sexually aroused by feces.

Klismaphilia - involves people who are sexually aroused by enemas.

Urophilia - involves people who are sexually aroused by urine.

[Richard]

Pedophilia only.  And that is only if you actually commit a crime.

[Gabu]

None of those conditions themselves should be illegal.  However, here's the list of which should be illegal to act upon:

Homosexuality - No.

Exhibitionism - Yes.

Fetishism - No.

Frotteurism - Yes.

Paedophilia - Yes.

Sexual Masochism - No.  These people are pretty weird, but it's their own body.

Sexual Sadism - Yes, unless the other person is known to have given consent; in that case, undecided.

Transvestic Fetishism - No.

Voyeurism - Yes.

Telephone Scatologia - Yes.

Necrophilia - Yes.

Partialism - No, as long as the other person is fine with it.

Zoophilia - Undecided.

Coprophilia - Disgusting, but no.

Klismaphilia - No.

Urophilia - No.

[John Dibble]

Well, the obvious paedophilia - can't have sex with no children now. Exhibitionism in the sense of walking around public and flashing people, though not illegal in the consenting case. Frotteurism, since it involves touching someone on purpose against their will. Voyeurism, as it violates privacy. Other than that the others CAN be ok, though necrophilia only if the person consents to their corpse being used like that. The others, while some of them sick to me, don't really harm anyone(consent to have a sadist do stuff to you isn't really harm) or violate anyone's space, so I've got nothing against it.

[KillerPollo]

Homosexuality - Yes - Lately these people have been causing enough trouble around the globe. They own the ACLU and are lobbying congress into passing legislations favoring them, and make others treat them like a protected class, like Blacks used to be! They can exist, but not pressuring a government system to change! that is just ludicrous! as long as this is happening, it should be illegal.
Homosexuals are many times more likely to also have another paraphilia listed below, and are also 100 times more likely to be murdered.

Exhibitionism - Yes - This is already illegal

Fetishism - Yes - Under some circumstances

Frotteurism - again, this can lead to rape, and it already is called Sexual Harassment.

Paedophilia - No - Only if the child is consenting (JK) - Yes, it should be illegal

Sexual Masochism - Yes (see below)

Sexual Sadism - Yes - a massive onslaught of lawsuits would emerge

Transvestic Fetishism - Yes - under some circumstances

Voyeurism - Yes - Like Gabu said, this is invasion of privacy

Telephone Scatologia - Yes - This is called Harassment!

Necrophilia - Yes - Dead people can't consent

Partialism - Yes - under some circumstamces

Zoophilia - Yes - Non-human animals can't speak out their consent.

Coprophilia - Yes - We can't have disease spreading

Klismaphilia - Yes - see above

Urophilia - Yes - see above

[Richard]

Frotteurism, since it involves touching someone on purpose against their will.

No, it does not say that.  It says UNCONSENTING.  It could be a case of rubbing against someone on the dance floor (afterall, no express consent was given).  It could also be bad.

[Frodo]

Of these, only paedophilia, zoophilia, and necrophilia should be deemed illegal, as they involve beings unable or unwilling to give consent.

All of the others, I assume, involve adults engaging in a mutually consensual activity.

[Richard]

Of these, only paedophilia, zoophilia, frotteurism, and necrophilia should be deemed illegal, as they involve beings unable or unwilling to give consent.

All of the others, I assume, involve adults engaging in a mutually consensual activity.

Please, what if I choose to consent in my will that my body can be used for necrophilia?

[John Dibble]

Frotteurism, since it involves touching someone on purpose against their will.

No, it does not say that.  It says UNCONSENTING.  It could be a case of rubbing against someone on the dance floor (afterall, no express consent was given).  It could also be bad.

Well, I took it more in the sense of like rubbing up against someone in a harassing manner on a subway train or something, not something like dancing where such physical contact is somewhat expected.

[Gabu]

Homosexuals are ... 100 times more likely to be murdered.

Why is this a reason to ban homosexuality?

Klismaphilia - Yes - see above

Er, how does disease spread through enemas?

[Ebowed]

It should be illegal to act upon the following:
Exhibitionism
Frotteurism (Depends)
Pedophilia
Sexual Sadism
Voyeurism
Necrophilia
Zoophilia

The rest are just disgusting (except the telephone thing), especially coprophilia.

[John Dibble]

Klismaphilia - Yes - see above

Er, how does disease spread through enemas?

Further, sex itself can spread disease, so I think it's poor reason to ban it.

[opebo]

This is a very poorly designed poll, as there is no option for 'none of the above'.

[Rob]

Only pedophilia and zoophilia, as animals and children can't consent. Necrophilia should be legal if the corpse has given signed consent before death.

[Speed of Sound]

Homosexuality - No.

Exhibitionism - no.

Fetishism - No.

Frotteurism - Yes

Paedophilia - Yes, unless other is consenting, in which case yes.

Sexual Masochism - No.

Sexual Sadism - Yes, unless other is consenting

Transvestic Fetishism - No.

Voyeurism - Yes.

Telephone Scatologia - No.

Necrophilia - Yes, unless somehow other is consenting

Partialism - No, as long as other is consenting

Zoophilia -hhhmmmmmm.......i guess if the animal is consenting.........somehow......

Coprophilia - Disgusting, but no.

Klismaphilia - No.

Urophilia - No.

[Hatman 🍁]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

[Filuwaúrdjan]

Most of those things are f ing sick

[minionofmidas]

None of those conditions themselves should be illegal.  However, here's the list of which should be illegal to act upon:

Homosexuality - No.

Exhibitionism - Yes. Just any old public nudity should not be illegal, though.

Fetishism - No.

Frotteurism - Yes/No/depends on what exactly (sexual harassment). Didn't vote yes.

Paedophilia - Yes, as long as we're talking children rather than minors. I think I may have forgotten to vote for this one.

Sexual Masochism - No.

Sexual Sadism - No. (As long as the other partner consents, and nobody gets killed.)

Transvestic Fetishism - No.

Voyeurism - Yes.

Telephone Scatologia - Yes (sexual harassment).

Necrophilia - Yes.

Partialism - No.

Zoophilia - Yes.

Coprophilia - Disgusting, but no.

Klismaphilia - See above.

Urophilia - See above.

[Filuwaúrdjan]

Just thinking, but I'm pretty sure that most of those are illegal in the U.K; R v Brown (the evidence videos are still doing the rounds in police stations, btw) makes that fairly clear methinks...

[MaC]

KillerPollo, I heard they're gonna find a cure for Gay!  Then finally we'll be able to put all of these gross disorders to rest.  They'll never come back because until the ultra liberal gay 60s, gayness didn't exist.  We can contain all of these diseases and quarantine all these people into concentration safety camps to make sure they don't harm us straight people.  And when we finally find a cure we can give them the final solution antidote, and we'll cure the whole world of gay and nobody will ever have a sex-related problem again.

(PM me for a virtual b!tchslap if you can't tell my sarcasm)

[John Dibble]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

What...wait...huh? So sex with an animal is worse than molesting a human child? Are you a member of PETA or something?

[Gabu]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

What...wait...huh? So sex with an animal is worse than molesting a human child? Are you a member of PETA or something?

Maybe the kid wanted it!


Okay, that's enough opebo impersonation to last a decade or so.  Now I need a shower.

[Hatman 🍁]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

What...wait...huh? So sex with an animal is worse than molesting a human child? Are you a member of PETA or something?

Don't you watch South Park, PETA is the problem

[John Dibble]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

What...wait...huh? So sex with an animal is worse than molesting a human child? Are you a member of PETA or something?

Don't you watch South Park, PETA is the problem

Yes, I do, and that's how I feel about PETA, they seem to value animal life over human life, which I find ridiculous. That's why I'm asking - why is sex with animals worse than child molestation?

[Hatman 🍁]

Zoophilia is by far the worse on this list, followed closely by paedophilia.

What...wait...huh? So sex with an animal is worse than molesting a human child? Are you a member of PETA or something?

Don't you watch South Park, PETA is the problem

Yes, I do, and that's how I feel about PETA, they seem to value animal life over human life, which I find ridiculous. That's why I'm asking - why is sex with animals worse than child molestation?

They are both equally bad, because consent is not given in either place. The only think that makes zoophilia worse, is that when it comes to animals, consent can never be given. With pedophilia, some age groups are old enough to give consent. (doesnt make it right though). However, when we are speaking of non consentual pedophilia, it is equally as bad.