absentee/early vote thread, part 2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:52:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  absentee/early vote thread, part 2
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 78
Author Topic: absentee/early vote thread, part 2  (Read 112420 times)
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #950 on: November 05, 2016, 12:15:45 AM »

Aren't the CO numbers a bit odd to you as well ?

Only 1.66 million ballots have been returned so far and there are only Monday and Tuesday left to return ballots.

Final turnout in 2012 was 2.6 million.

It's pretty unlikely that there are 300K returned on Monday and Tuesday, when it was 100-150K each day now.

That suggests turnout will be much lower in CO this year, somwhere between 2-2.5 million votes (unless there's a surge of election day voters).
Mail-ins surge in the final days. Anecdotally, people here are very lazy.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #951 on: November 05, 2016, 12:16:09 AM »

Non-Swing State Oregon Update through 11/3 (95k new voters ). Total Votes to date (47.8D-34.9R-17.3I) and Turnout (47.7D-48.0R-25.1I) for a current 41.0% total statewide turnout to date.

Republicans appear to be picking up on the enthusiasm gap statewide, as are Indies that tend to vote much more heavily Democratic than Republican in Oregon overall.

Overall County turnout levels are significantly lagging in Metro-Portland (38% RV turnout) vs "downstate" counties in the Mid-Valley (42%), Coastal Oregon (44%), Southern Oregon (45%).

Still Democratic turnout levels continue to exceed Republican turnout levels in (15) of the (22) counties on my list with flips since my last update in Linn, Lincoln, Douglas, and Curry).

However overall turnout by Party ID was a net gain for Republicans in all but (3) of the (22) counties on my list (Washington, Yamhill, and Curry).

Not a bad day for Democratic turnout in Oregon overall with the growth of Indie votes, but definitely a good day for Republicans in terms of not only taking an actual lead in turnout levels statewide, but actually taking a narrow turnout lead in some heavily Republican Counties in Southern and Western Oregon, as well as am EV lead by Party ID in some traditional "swing" counties in statewide elections.



Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #952 on: November 05, 2016, 12:19:16 AM »

Aren't the CO numbers a bit odd to you as well ?

Only 1.66 million ballots have been returned so far and there are only Monday and Tuesday left to return ballots.

Final turnout in 2012 was 2.6 million.

It's pretty unlikely that there are 300K returned on Monday and Tuesday, when it was 100-150K each day now.

That suggests turnout will be much lower in CO this year, somwhere between 2-2.5 million votes (unless there's a surge of election day voters).
Mail-ins surge in the final days. Anecdotally, people here are very lazy.
Tender is just being obtuse.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #953 on: November 05, 2016, 12:22:00 AM »

Aren't the CO numbers a bit odd to you as well ?

Only 1.66 million ballots have been returned so far and there are only Monday and Tuesday left to return ballots.

Final turnout in 2012 was 2.6 million.

It's pretty unlikely that there are 300K returned on Monday and Tuesday, when it was 100-150K each day now.

That suggests turnout will be much lower in CO this year, somwhere between 2-2.5 million votes (unless there's a surge of election day voters).
Mail-ins surge in the final days. Anecdotally, people here are very lazy.

Look at the 2014 numbers.  The Friday morning before election day, total turnout was 1.15 million.  Total turnout ended up at 2 million.  A whole lot of votes are about to come in this weekend and on Tuesday.  If 2014 is any indication, Democrats wait until the last minute in Colorado to drop off their ballots.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #954 on: November 05, 2016, 12:24:11 AM »

Thx to Lief for giving a proper explanation (without insulting me) and the two others can kiss my ass.
Logged
mark_twain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 427
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #955 on: November 05, 2016, 12:24:26 AM »


Early voting data from CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/04/politics/latinos-voter-turnout-early-voting-2016-election/index.html


Early voting data in 3 key states show spike in Latino turnout


Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,451
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #956 on: November 05, 2016, 12:25:30 AM »


Extra spoopy
Logged
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #957 on: November 05, 2016, 12:27:43 AM »

Sorry to burst your red avatar orgy here, but here's the reality on CO right now. Republicans pulled ahead with Early voters. Magellan may be a questionable pollster, but they are usually good about releasing the Early Vote stuff in CO ahead of the SoS.
Romney won early vote by 2 in CO. He lost the state by five points. In being tied, Trump is doing worse than Romney already.
To you other folks "gleeful" right now about Nevada, Trump's not deviating 3,000 miles out of his way tomorrow to have a rally in Reno by accident. If it were "over" there as you claim it is, he would have picked Michigan or another closer East Coast state to campaign in.

Seriously on Nov 9th

To all you libtards gleefully celebrating Clinton's 'victory', Trump hasn't conceded yet! This isn't an accident, he knows it's not over! If it was he'd be out golfing or groping instead of having a meltdown on twitter!
Logged
Southern Delegate matthew27
matthew27
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,668
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #958 on: November 05, 2016, 12:28:03 AM »

Who else thinks that the Latino electorate will be around 14%+ this election? I sure do...Heck, if they come out like African Americans did last year = 16-17%. There's never going to be a better reason to vote against a republican!
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #959 on: November 05, 2016, 12:29:20 AM »

Ralston

57,000 voted as of 10 PM.
Now we wait for the tallies...
Dems could match 71K edge at end of 2012 early voting after this turnout tonight.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #960 on: November 05, 2016, 12:30:03 AM »

57k in Clark County as of 10 pm.
Logged
gf20202
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #961 on: November 05, 2016, 12:35:45 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ralston says the 71k edge from 2012 could be matched. Assume it's locked on the presidential side.

What's odd for me is that he's been more positive for CCM than he was for Berkeley. Why? Heller still managed to win despite that margin to overcome.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #962 on: November 05, 2016, 12:37:26 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ralston says the 71k edge from 2012 could be matched. Assume it's locked on the presidential side.

What's odd for me is that he's been more positive for CCM than he was for Berkeley. Why? Heller still managed to win despite that margin to overcome.
Candidate Quality.  Heck got less votes than Romney, yet still won.  Berkeley was just horrible.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #963 on: November 05, 2016, 12:42:42 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ralston says the 71k edge from 2012 could be matched. Assume it's locked on the presidential side.

What's odd for me is that he's been more positive for CCM than he was for Berkeley. Why? Heller still managed to win despite that margin to overcome.
Candidate Quality.  Heck got less votes than Romney, yet still won.  Berkeley was just horrible.

+ the electorate is more non-white than in 2012.
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #964 on: November 05, 2016, 12:45:51 AM »

Nate Cohn

Less regular voters are steadily representing a larger and larger share of N.C. early voters

Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,451
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #965 on: November 05, 2016, 12:51:47 AM »

Nate Cohn

Less regular voters are steadily representing a larger and larger share of N.C. early voters



I wonder whose GOTV efforts is making that happen Wink
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #966 on: November 05, 2016, 01:02:13 AM »

Nate Cohn

Less regular voters are steadily representing a larger and larger share of N.C. early voters



I wonder whose GOTV efforts is making that happen Wink

lol I know

I'll be sorely disappointed if NC goes red even if Hillary wins. NC is more than just a matter of 15 EV to me. It's a matter of flushing Republicans in the state down the toilet. Democrats need to send a message this year.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #967 on: November 05, 2016, 01:04:59 AM »

Aren't the CO numbers a bit odd to you as well ?

Only 1.66 million ballots have been returned so far and there are only Monday and Tuesday left to return ballots.

Final turnout in 2012 was 2.6 million.

It's pretty unlikely that there are 300K returned on Monday and Tuesday, when it was 100-150K each day now.

That suggests turnout will be much lower in CO this year, somwhere between 2-2.5 million votes (unless there's a surge of election day voters).
Mail-ins surge in the final days. Anecdotally, people here are very lazy.

Look at the 2014 numbers.  The Friday morning before election day, total turnout was 1.15 million.  Total turnout ended up at 2 million.  A whole lot of votes are about to come in this weekend and on Tuesday.  If 2014 is any indication, Democrats wait until the last minute in Colorado to drop off their ballots.

Tender---

With all due respect it appears that you don't understand how VbM states work, including transitional VbM states like Colorado.

The vast majority of votes do come in over the weekend, and usually the greatest numbers are on ED itself, although granted Colorado is an imperfect version of Oregon when it comes to their voting systems and turnout levels. Sad
Logged
BoAtlantis
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #968 on: November 05, 2016, 01:05:24 AM »

"So far, 63% of the people with a >98% chance of voting have turned out. Our model doesn't seem like it has a great grasp on 20 v 50%"

Logged
gf20202
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #969 on: November 05, 2016, 01:47:11 AM »
« Edited: November 05, 2016, 01:50:35 AM by gf20202 »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Wow.

Haven't seen this confirmed, but makes sense. Matches O's lead in 2012 when he won by 6.7. Of course, Heller won by 1.2% in the same circumstance.

Edit:

Ralston confirm

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
QE
Rookie
**
Posts: 64
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #970 on: November 05, 2016, 01:50:27 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Wow.

Haven't seen this confirmed, but makes sense. Matches O's lead in 2012 when he won by 6.7. Of course, Heller won by 1.2% in the same circumstance.

Yup. Confirmed by Ralston:


Jon Ralston
‏@RalstonReports
Dems win Clark by 11,000-plus, will be ahead overall there by 72K-plus, more than 2012. May be game over in NV for GOP.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #971 on: November 05, 2016, 01:50:44 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Wow.

Haven't seen this confirmed, but makes sense. Matches O's lead in 2012 when he won by 6.7. Of course, Heller won by 1.2% in the same circumstance.

They updated the official numbers at NV SOS:

http://nvsos.gov/sos/elections/voters/election-turnout-statistics
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #972 on: November 05, 2016, 01:51:00 AM »

Ralston:

Dems win Clark by 11,000-plus, will be ahead overall there by 72K-plus, more than 2012. May be game over in NV for GOP.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #973 on: November 05, 2016, 02:01:38 AM »

Here are the current statewide numbers (which will change very slightly when the few remaining rural counties report Fri numbers):

Dems: 323,466 (42.2%)
Reps: 277,417 (36.1%)
Other: 166,532 (21.7%)
TOTAL: 767,415 (equal to 8.8% increase over 2012 EV)

So Dems have the exact same 42-36 = 6% edge over Reps that they had in 2012.

Source: http://nvsos.gov/sos/elections/voters/election-turnout-statistics


 
Logged
JimSharp
Rookie
**
Posts: 22
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #974 on: November 05, 2016, 02:15:38 AM »

Here are the current statewide numbers (which will change very slightly when the few remaining rural counties report Fri numbers):

Dems: 323,466 (42.2%)
Reps: 277,417 (36.1%)
Other: 166,532 (21.7%)
TOTAL: 767,415 (equal to 8.8% increase over 2012 EV)

So Dems have the exact same 42-36 = 6% edge over Reps that they had in 2012.




 


Interesting thing - if the "others" break by the 54-27 that CNN poll had them breaking the race is bascially tie right now... (Not saying they will, that's a weird number historically and demographically for NV, but it's an odd math quirk that that split will bring it back close.)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 78  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 13 queries.