Which triumvirate you would vote to rule the Earth?

[Huckleberry Finn]

Obvious choices.

I hate Chirac and Berlusconi equally. Shröder is completely incompetent and Putin is a monster. I'm not big one of Bush or Blair neither. But I have to say I'd choose Bush-Blair-Berlusconi, but would like to see John Howard (for example) instead of Berlusconi.

[bullmoose88]

Obvious choices.

I hate Chirac and Berlusconi equally. Shröder is completely incompetent and Putin is a monster. I'm not big one of Bush or Blair neither. But I have to say I'd choose Bush-Blair-Berlusconi, but would like to see John Howard (for example) instead of Berlusconi.

Essentially the same answer.

My vote was for Blair. And Blair alone.

[KillerPollo]

Obvious choices.

I hate Chirac and Berlusconi equally. Shröder is completely incompetent and Putin is a monster. I'm not big one of Bush or Blair neither. But I have to say I'd choose Bush-Blair-Berlusconi, but would like to see John Howard (for example) instead of Berlusconi.

I'd like to see Prez Fox of Mexico there

how about a Fox-Howard-Koizumi triumvirate?

[Gabu]

Option 1, purely because I don't want to see Putin anywhere near the reins of a place in which I live.

[opebo]

Putin obviously belongs with Bush and Burlesconi, but I voted for him because of Schroeder and Chirac. 

[Emsworth]

What terrible choices! Bush, Blair, Berlusconi

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Putin obviously belongs with Bush and Burlesconi, but I voted for him because of Schroeder and Chirac. 

same

[minionofmidas]

Manmohan Singh/Lula da Silva/Jean Chretien sounds fine with me.

[minionofmidas]

Of those above, Chirac is a crook, Blair is stark barking mad, Putin is a murderer, Bush is a crook and a murderer, Berlusconi is a crook, a murderer, and stark barking mad, and while Schröder is the best of the lot he's still worse than 90% of humanity. In a nutshell. And with much reined-in civility and respect.

[Democratic Hawk]

How about Ena (Sharples), Martha (Longhurst) and Minnie (Kramer)?

Dave

[Democratic Hawk]

Seriously, I vote for Bush, Blair and Berlusconi! Politically, I don't like Bush or Berlusconi much - but I don't like Chirace and Putin can "burn in hell" for all I care

I haven't forgotten the Kursk

Dave

[Huckleberry Finn]

Of those above, Chirac is a crook, Blair is stark barking mad, Putin is a murderer, Bush is a crook and a murderer, Berlusconi is a crook, a murderer, and stark barking mad, and while Schröder is the best of the lot he's still worse than 90% of humanity. In a nutshell. And with much reined-in civility and respect.

I hate Berlusconi but how he is a murderer?

If I could choose freely from ALL historical characters I'd pick Churchill-Adenauer-Paasikivi.

[Middle-aged Europe]

Eh, I would like to replace Putin with Blair in the second triumvirate.

Then I would consider to vote for this triumvirate (Blair/Chirac/Schröder) as the lesser evil. At the moment I´m not voting for anyone.

[Schmitz in 1972]

Of those above, Chirac is a crook, Blair is stark barking mad, Putin is a murderer, Bush is a crook and a murderer, Berlusconi is a crook, a murderer, and stark barking mad, and while Schröder is the best of the lot he's still worse than 90% of humanity. In a nutshell. And with much reined-in civility and respect.

In other words neither triumvirate is better than say, a Castro-Kim Jong Il-Al Bashir triumvirate?

[opebo]

Manmohan Singh/Lula da Silva/Jean Chretien sounds fine with me.

I like Singh too!  And those other two are perfectly find responsible leaders compared to any of the ones listed in the poll.

Of those above, Chirac is a crook, Blair is stark barking mad, Putin is a murderer, Bush is a crook and a murderer, Berlusconi is a crook, a murderer, and stark barking mad, and while Schröder is the best of the lot he's still worse than 90% of humanity. In a nutshell. And with much reined-in civility and respect.

Hah, well said Trondheim!  But I'll take an ordinary crook like Chirac any day over that crowd of murderers.  It is interesting that Blair is so insane - do you think it is caused by his religiousity?

[Emsworth]

Manmohan Singh/Lula da Silva/Jean Chretien sounds fine with me.

I like Singh too!

Eh, I'm not particularly keen about him as Prime Minister. However, Congress is much, much better than the alternative, the fanatics of the BJP.

[opebo]

Manmohan Singh/Lula da Silva/Jean Chretien sounds fine with me.

I like Singh too![/url]
Eh, I'm not particularly keen about him as Prime Minister. However, Congress is much, much better than the alternative, the fanatics of the BJP.

Well, yeah I guess that's what I meant, as I don't know that much about him personally.  Just that Congress is enormously superior to those religious BJPs.

[Keystone Phil]

This was a very easy decision to make - Bush/Berlusconi/Blair  

[Speed of Sound]

other:Jim Carrey/Nelson Mandela/Mark Spitz. Why? because i can.

[MasterJedi]

Bush/Blair/Berlusconi easily, very easily. You don't know how easily I'm voting for Option 1!

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Neither

[minionofmidas]

Of those above, Chirac is a crook, Blair is stark barking mad, Putin is a murderer, Bush is a crook and a murderer, Berlusconi is a crook, a murderer, and stark barking mad, and while Schröder is the best of the lot he's still worse than 90% of humanity. In a nutshell. And with much reined-in civility and respect.

In other words neither triumvirate is better than say, a Castro-Kim Jong Il-Al Bashir triumvirate?

No. Either triumvirate is better than Castro-Kim Jong Il-Al Bashir (er...that's the Sudanese head guy? or do you mean Bashir al-NixonNow?)

[minionofmidas]

It is interesting that Blair is so insane - do you think it is caused by his religiousity?

No.

[A18]

Bush is a crook and a murderer

Wow. We have some really dumb German posters on this board.

[Banana Republic]

I don't like any of those leaders.