Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 01, 2021, 03:04:02 AM
Talk Elections
Election Archive
Election Archive
2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
...
30
Author
Topic: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2 (Read 66534 times)
Ljube
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,708
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #100 on:
July 27, 2016, 11:45:16 PM »
Quote from: PiT, South Governor on July 27, 2016, 07:24:23 PM
Quote from: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 27, 2016, 06:42:17 PM
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 27, 2016, 06:20:41 PM
Quote from: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 27, 2016, 08:44:36 AM
It's just impossible to like Hillary, and I say this as someone who probably lines up with her views fairly closely (before she bent over and adopted some of sanders positions).
Sorry Dukey it isn't but that's your loss, my friend
I'm just destined to not vote in this election, so it seems. I haven't heard a compelling case yet that convinces me to vote for her.
I suspect that a significant proportion of the huge undecideds in polls now will end up not voting. People aren't very happy with the choices that are presented.
Indeed. With two unpopular candidates running and the campaign destined to be negative, we should expect many people to stay home. Turnout will be much lower than in the previous two elections.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,991
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #101 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:14:50 AM »
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/27):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 40 (+/-)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,029
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #102 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:38:28 AM »
«
Edited:
July 28, 2016, 02:55:08 AM
by
Seriously? »
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 27, 2016, 06:15:53 AM
Quote from: LittleBigPlanet on July 27, 2016, 06:12:52 AM
Quote from: Ebsy on July 27, 2016, 02:16:29 AM
Trump now up by 7. Still want to defend this trash heap?
If one is intrested in trend, it indeed gives some information. I don't believe, Trump is +7 now, but I don't believe either, Clinton was +12 as ABC/Washington and Ipsos/Reuters showed.
Or is ABC pollster a trash heap as well?
Clinton was never ahead by that much.
Clinton was +15 with LV in the Reuters pile of garbage and +12 in the ABC/WashPo trash heap of an outlier poll.
An honest assessment had it at about Hillary! +5 or +6 at one point, just like an honest assessment right now has it at about Trump +1 or Trump +2.
Not to say that this LA Times poll is rubbish. The track record for this methodology was pretty strong in 2012. However, until we have more LV data points, I look at this thing similarly to how I look at the Reuters poll -- for trendlines.
(Keep in mind most other national polls (aside from Rasmussen) are RV right now. Reuters just started quoting LV in their press articles. It's an apples and oranges kind of thing until the polling methodology switch completely changes over in the next few weeks to a month.)
Overall, it suggests roughly a 4-point bounce from the poll's inception and a 7-point bounce from 7/20, the only day Hillary! lead in the survey.
The overall bounce is pretty much in line with what we've been seeing from peak Hillary!
For those into decimals, it's 47.4% Trump, 40.1% Clinton in this latest dump, the trendline is still moving up slightly for the Donald.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
Posts: 15,750
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #103 on:
July 28, 2016, 08:16:22 AM »
Quote from: nm825 on July 27, 2016, 09:32:37 AM
And here come Atlas's resident Baghdad Bobs to come in and yell, "junk poll!" Shades of 2012 Romneyites and the "unskewing" of polls.
I agree. It's questionable.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
Posts: 19,500
Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #104 on:
July 28, 2016, 08:25:10 AM »
«
Edited:
July 28, 2016, 08:42:02 AM
by
Fmr President & Senator Polnut »
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 08:16:22 AM
Quote from: nm825 on July 27, 2016, 09:32:37 AM
And here come Atlas's resident Baghdad Bobs to come in and yell, "junk poll!" Shades of 2012 Romneyites and the "unskewing" of polls.
I agree. It's questionable.
Again... No. "Unskewing" was based on the GOP fever dream that a) the 2008 electorate was a fluke and b) not understanding anything about how party self-ID had changed. What most of us are doing is when the core datasets that make up the poll are wonky to an extreme, when compared to what we know about the state of the race, then I'm calling BS.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
Posts: 26,816
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #105 on:
July 28, 2016, 08:29:45 AM »
The internals are legitimately bad (dive in and look) whereas Reuters aren't.
Logged
amdcpus
Jr. Member
Posts: 305
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #106 on:
July 28, 2016, 08:38:23 AM »
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 28, 2016, 08:25:10 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 08:16:22 AM
Quote from: nm825 on July 27, 2016, 09:32:37 AM
And here come Atlas's resident Baghdad Bobs to come in and yell, "junk poll!" Shades of 2012 Romneyites and the "unskewing" of polls.
I agree. It's questionable.
Again... No.
Can you even vote in this election?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
Posts: 19,500
Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #107 on:
July 28, 2016, 08:42:28 AM »
Quote from: amdcpus on July 28, 2016, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 28, 2016, 08:25:10 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 08:16:22 AM
Quote from: nm825 on July 27, 2016, 09:32:37 AM
And here come Atlas's resident Baghdad Bobs to come in and yell, "junk poll!" Shades of 2012 Romneyites and the "unskewing" of polls.
I agree. It's questionable.
That's the best you got?
Again... No.
Can you even vote in this election?
Logged
amdcpus
Jr. Member
Posts: 305
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/25 - Trump +5
«
Reply #108 on:
July 28, 2016, 09:03:00 AM »
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 28, 2016, 08:42:28 AM
Quote from: amdcpus on July 28, 2016, 08:38:23 AM
Quote from: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on July 28, 2016, 08:25:10 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 08:16:22 AM
Quote from: nm825 on July 27, 2016, 09:32:37 AM
And here come Atlas's resident Baghdad Bobs to come in and yell, "junk poll!" Shades of 2012 Romneyites and the "unskewing" of polls.
I agree. It's questionable.
That's the best you got?
Again... No.
Can you even vote in this election?
So no?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
Posts: 15,750
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #109 on:
July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM »
There's no logical reason for this election to be close, yes. But it is. As distressing as that may be we shouldn't nitpick about crosstabs, while sticking our heads in the sand and ignoring the broader trend. I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
There's little we can do to impact the outcome of the election, but no good will come out of dismissing or ignoring the polls we don't like; God willing, this won't haplen, but if we continue in this manner, we on the Atlas may be in for a devastating shock on election day-- despite the polls having forcasted it.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Politician
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 8,444
Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #110 on:
July 28, 2016, 09:44:01 AM »
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
There's no logical reason for this election to be close, yes. But it is. As distressing as that may be we shouldn't nitpick about crosstabs, while sticking our heads in the sand and ignoring the broader trend. I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
There's little we can do to impact the outcome of the election, but no good will come out of dismissing or ignoring the polls we don't like; God willing, this won't haplen, but if we continue in this manner, we on the Atlas may be in for a devastating shock on election day-- despite the polls having forcasted it.
This election may not be close in the end. Almost every election has a period where it's close. Historically, it was very common to see wild swings in polling before things settled down.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
Posts: 13,117
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #111 on:
July 28, 2016, 09:45:55 AM »
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
In fairness, RCP is a Republican propaganda machine.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Politician
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 8,444
Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #112 on:
July 28, 2016, 09:46:56 AM »
Quote from: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on July 28, 2016, 09:45:55 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
In fairness, RCP is a Republican propaganda machine.
RCP
is
conservative, by and large. Their aggregate, however, is not biased.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
Posts: 4,496
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #113 on:
July 28, 2016, 10:25:10 AM »
Quote from: Devout Centrist on July 28, 2016, 09:46:56 AM
Quote from: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on July 28, 2016, 09:45:55 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
In fairness, RCP is a Republican propaganda machine.
RCP
is
conservative, by and large. Their aggregate, however, is not biased.
It picks and chooses polls, yeah it is just as biased.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
Posts: 4,653
Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #114 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:22:42 PM »
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 28, 2016, 10:25:10 AM
Quote from: Devout Centrist on July 28, 2016, 09:46:56 AM
Quote from: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on July 28, 2016, 09:45:55 AM
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
In fairness, RCP is a Republican propaganda machine.
RCP
is
conservative, by and large. Their aggregate, however, is not biased.
It picks and chooses polls, yeah it is just as biased.
538's "Nowcast" says Hildebeast would win the popular vote by 0.2%
The RCP average has Trump up by 0.9%
1.1% is noise, not bias.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 31,941
Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #115 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:25:41 PM »
Quote from: afleitch on July 28, 2016, 08:29:45 AM
The internals are legitimately bad (dive in and look) whereas Reuters aren't.
I'm not sure about now, but before Reuters had ridiculous Democratic registration advantages. Like D+15 at one point I think. They're dreadful.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 31,941
Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #116 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:30:35 PM »
Quote from: Simfan34 on July 28, 2016, 09:40:57 AM
There's no logical reason for this election to be close, yes. But it is. As distressing as that may be we shouldn't nitpick about crosstabs, while sticking our heads in the sand and ignoring the broader trend. I mean, people are now trying to claim RCP are right wing hacks. RCP!
There's little we can do to impact the outcome of the election, but no good will come out of dismissing or ignoring the polls we don't like; God willing, this won't haplen, but if we continue in this manner, we on the Atlas may be in for a devastating shock on election day-- despite the polls having forcasted it.
There is a logical reason for it to be close: 45% of the country will vote for any Republican under any circumstances, and convention bounces almost always happen. Seriously, how can people who have been around the block for many elections be SURPRISED by a convention bounce? I genuinely do not get it.
As for RCP, it is a good source that I use, but it is objectively a right wing site. Their editorials are like 90% conservative. They try not to screw with the data too much, which is nice, but there are definitely times every once in a while when they have their thumb on the scale.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
Posts: 26,816
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #117 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:31:45 PM »
Quote from: IceSpear on July 28, 2016, 02:25:41 PM
Quote from: afleitch on July 28, 2016, 08:29:45 AM
The internals are legitimately bad (dive in and look) whereas Reuters aren't.
I'm not sure about now, but before Reuters had ridiculous Democratic registration advantages. Like D+15 at one point I think. They're dreadful.
That's why I said the internals are fine. Do the internals 'add up' to an accurate national Clinton v Trump share? No. That's in the weighting,
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
Posts: 4,653
Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/26 - Trump +7
«
Reply #118 on:
July 28, 2016, 02:38:21 PM »
Quote from: afleitch on July 28, 2016, 02:31:45 PM
Quote from: IceSpear on July 28, 2016, 02:25:41 PM
Quote from: afleitch on July 28, 2016, 08:29:45 AM
The internals are legitimately bad (dive in and look) whereas Reuters aren't.
I'm not sure about now, but before Reuters had ridiculous Democratic registration advantages. Like D+15 at one point I think. They're dreadful.
That's why I said the internals are fine. Do the internals 'add up' to an accurate national Clinton v Trump share? No. That's in the weighting,
Unless you have a %$%#&ing HUGE sample, the internals simply cannot add up.
You balance your sample to the national data points (age, race, education, rural, urban, suburbs, etc) but the regional samples are simply too small to be balanced.
To make an extreme illustration if you did a "poll" of 8 people in the US there should be 1 african american (Blacks are about 12.2% of the population in the US) - So if you broke the US into 4 zones of 2 people each, one zone would have to be 50% black (wrong!) and the other 3 zones would be 0% black (wrong!) - but the overall sample would be ok.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,991
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #119 on:
July 29, 2016, 02:18:02 AM »
USC/LA Times national tracking poll (7/28):
Trump - 47 (+/-)
Clinton - 41 (+1)
(#) denotes change from previous day
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
Posts: 3,695
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #120 on:
July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM »
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
Posts: 2,483
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #121 on:
July 29, 2016, 06:23:09 AM »
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
Im so happy your back...
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #122 on:
July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM »
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
Posts: 4,496
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #123 on:
July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM »
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
Posts: 739
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/27 - Trump +7
«
Reply #124 on:
July 29, 2016, 09:17:40 AM »
Quote from: JerryArkansas on July 29, 2016, 09:02:58 AM
Quote from: Mallow on July 29, 2016, 07:52:40 AM
Quote from: ProgressiveCanadian on July 29, 2016, 03:59:49 AM
Clinton convention bump, HUUUGGEE!!!
You do realize that 1: this is a seven-day running average (as has been discussed in this thread already), and 2: because of that fact,
Trump's convention bump in this poll didn't even BEGIN until AFTER the convention was over
, and by analogy, Clinton's shouldn't begin until tomorrow's tracking numbers, right? No?
Also the poll itself is just sh**t.
I'm not convinced of that. Perhaps it has a bias, but that doesn't mean it is useless. It seems to capture trends pretty well (if late).
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
...
30
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.
Loading...