USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
April 18, 2021, 01:09:24 AM
Talk Elections
Election Archive
Election Archive
2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
...
30
Author
Topic: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2 (Read 67234 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 11/7 - Trump +3.2
«
on:
July 15, 2016, 03:37:02 PM »
«
edited:
November 08, 2016, 10:21:08 AM
by
cinyc »
USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak Poll
Trump 43%
Clinton 40%
Weighted Panel of 3,000 Voters; MoE +/- 3.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-usc-lat-tracking-poll-20160705-snap-story.html
This is new daily tracking poll, which debuted today. Some info on the methodology:
Quote
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
It appears that they ask "Someone Else" instead of naming Johnson/Stein. I can't find the numbers for "someone else" or the undecideds in the linked article.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
Posts: 2,701
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #1 on:
July 15, 2016, 03:43:09 PM »
Who?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #2 on:
July 15, 2016, 03:46:00 PM »
Quote from: Spooky Mike on July 15, 2016, 03:43:09 PM
Who?
University of Southern California Dornsife College (their Liberal Arts division) and the Los Angeles Times, L.A.'s biggest newspaper.
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
Posts: 2,027
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #3 on:
July 15, 2016, 03:46:48 PM »
Not sure about USC Dornsife, but LA Times polls have an A- rating by 538
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #4 on:
July 15, 2016, 03:56:08 PM »
So is this going to be our thread for the daily poll?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #5 on:
July 15, 2016, 03:58:20 PM »
«
Edited:
July 15, 2016, 04:12:33 PM
by
cinyc »
More on the methodology here:
https://uasdata.usc.edu/data/election-poll
They basically ask 1/7th of the panel who they are going to vote for and the percentage chance they will vote per day, so 450 or so people are requestioned every day. Everyone theoretically gets asked once a week. They then weigh the results based on likelihood of vote and demographics to come up with a new topline at midnight (presumably Pacific time) every day, using the previous week's results.
Friday's results were closer than Thursday's, probably 42-41 Trump, but I can't say for sure because USC didn't provide real numbers, just a graph.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
Posts: 4,540
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #6 on:
July 15, 2016, 04:08:19 PM »
I guess this means Clinton will lose the election.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
Posts: 24,263
Political Matrix
E: -6.26, S: -4.96
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #7 on:
July 15, 2016, 04:40:57 PM »
Now I guess Trump will win the PV easily, while losing the EC by more than Romney did.
/s
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 31,937
Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #8 on:
July 15, 2016, 04:43:48 PM »
Quote from: TN volunteer on July 15, 2016, 04:35:00 PM
Quote from: TN volunteer on July 15, 2016, 07:13:11 AM
Wow, after being Safe R two days ago, it now looks as if the election is Safe D again.
Ratings change: Safe D --> Safe R
Actually, it would be Safe R if Trump led by 1 point. The fact that he leads by 3 makes it Super Ultra Mega Rock Solid R.
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 7,993
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #9 on:
July 15, 2016, 04:45:41 PM »
LA times literally admits that this is the first poll from the pollster. Total junk.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,029
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #10 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:06:45 PM »
«
Edited:
July 15, 2016, 05:34:11 PM
by
Seriously? »
Quote from: TN volunteer on July 15, 2016, 04:46:31 PM
Quote from: IceSpear on July 15, 2016, 04:43:48 PM
Quote from: TN volunteer on July 15, 2016, 04:35:00 PM
Quote from: TN volunteer on July 15, 2016, 07:13:11 AM
Wow, after being Safe R two days ago, it now looks as if the election is Safe D again.
Ratings change: Safe D --> Safe R
Actually, it would be Safe R if Trump led by 1 point. The fact that he leads by 3 makes it Super Ultra Mega Rock Solid R.
Come on man, let's not overreact to a few polls. I wonder if Trump will win the popular vote by 3 but lose in a landslide in the Electoral College, though? The NBC polls definitely give me cause for concern! Maybe the election is still Likely D, after all?
Ratings change: Safe R --> Likely D
Okay, I'll stop.
I am pretty sure we're in this different tranche of how they handle the likely voter or even registered voter electorate right now that is explaining the difference in the polling. Those clinging to a D+5 or D+6 model have Clinton with a lead. Those that are letting the electorate stay where it is based on the sample they get have Trump leading. More data points need to be made available before I can confirm.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
Posts: 361
Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #11 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:09:04 PM »
This is like the RAND/American Life Panel tracking poll from 2012 that surveyed the same group of people. Even if the topline is questionable, it could be good for tracking trends.
I wonder if RAND itself is going to be doing it again this cycle.
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 7,993
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #12 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:21:56 PM »
So this actually isn't really a poll and should probably not be recorded as such.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #13 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:23:15 PM »
Quote from: Ebsy on July 15, 2016, 04:45:41 PM
LA times literally admits that this is the first poll from the pollster. Total junk.
actually,
https://alpdata.rand.org/index.php?page=election2012
The site of the USC polling indicates that this is the exact same team which developed RAND in 2012 and correctly predicted the 2012 election based on their own polling + panelists, so I'd wait to jump to calling something junk just because it doesn't show your candidate ahead...
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #14 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:24:58 PM »
Quote from: john cage bubblegum on July 15, 2016, 05:09:04 PM
This is like the RAND/American Life Panel tracking poll from 2012 that surveyed the same group of people. Even if the topline is questionable, it could be good for tracking trends.
I wonder if RAND itself is going to be doing it again this cycle.
same team that developed that, developed this:
https://uasdata.usc.edu/data/election-poll
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
Posts: 28,504
Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #15 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:28:17 PM »
Questionable methodology.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #16 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:33:58 PM »
Quote from: Ebsy on July 15, 2016, 05:21:56 PM
So this actually isn't really a poll and should probably not be recorded as such.
No. It's a real tracking poll called a panel survey that uses the same panel over and over again instead of finding a new random sample every day. The panel is supposedly a representative sample of the electorate (with the pollsters even providing tablets and internet access to those without a computer). There is no magic in recruiting a new panel every day if the original sample is representative - it just costs the pollster more money.
Panel surveys have been used for tracking polls in the past. They're probably better for spotting trends than the toplines alone.
The other quirk that this pollster uses is weighing responses based on probability of voting instead of using a traditional likely voter screen.
Logged
Ebsy
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 7,993
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #17 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:35:49 PM »
lol the crosstabs are ridiculous junk as well. We'll see if this s[Inks] tracker improves at all as time goes on, but for now it is firmly in the junk category. The only interesting part for me is that the voters expect Clinton to win by a wide margin.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
Posts: 3,029
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #18 on:
July 15, 2016, 05:39:57 PM »
Quote from: Ebsy on July 15, 2016, 05:35:49 PM
lol the crosstabs are ridiculous junk as well. We'll see if this s[Inks] tracker improves at all as time goes on, but for now it is firmly in the junk category. The only interesting part for me is that the voters expect Clinton to win by a wide margin.
I don't think that's a good narrative for Clinton. As this race stays closer than expected and Trump looks like he can pull it off, the undecideds may think it's OK to get aboard the Trump train.
It's usually the candidate that beats the expectation game that gets the boost in from the undecideds in the end.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
Posts: 24,527
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National: Trump +3
«
Reply #19 on:
July 15, 2016, 06:06:30 PM »
Dubious methodology. Questionable randomness.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: Sat 7/16 - Tie
«
Reply #20 on:
July 16, 2016, 11:54:23 AM »
«
Edited:
July 16, 2016, 11:58:12 AM
by
cinyc »
Today's numbers:
Trump 42.2%
Clinton 41.8%
(951 respondents)
Yesterday was:
Trump 42.1%
Clinton 40.9%
(1193 respondents)
http://www.latimes.com/politics/
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
Posts: 4,048
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: Sat 7/16 - Tie
«
Reply #21 on:
July 16, 2016, 12:02:57 PM »
That's a good trend. It went from Trump +1.2 to Trump +0.4. If this continues, then Clinton will win every vote on Election Day.
Logged
Terry the Fat Shark
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 5,998
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: Sat 7/16 - Tie
«
Reply #22 on:
July 17, 2016, 02:12:07 AM »
«
Edited:
July 17, 2016, 03:05:53 AM
by
dfwlibertylover »
New numbers:
Trump - 42.8
Clinton - 41.7
https://uasdata.usc.edu/data/election-poll
based on 1,828 respondents
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,531
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/19 - Tie
«
Reply #23 on:
July 18, 2016, 02:27:24 AM »
«
Edited:
July 20, 2016, 11:43:29 AM
by
cinyc »
7/17 Numbers:
Trump 42.9%
Clinton 42.2%
Logged
Donnie
Jr. Member
Posts: 351
Re: USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Daybreak National Tracking: 7/17 - Trump +1
«
Reply #24 on:
July 18, 2016, 03:10:47 AM »
I am not sure about this tracking poll, but L.A Times had always
very accurate polls in the past.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
...
30
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.
Loading...