Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:57:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 32
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 28622 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,037


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: March 26, 2016, 05:18:23 PM »

will sanders get over 70 in king?
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: March 26, 2016, 05:18:40 PM »

if sanders ran third party, would a generic R compete with hilalry in WA?

damn these margins are insane.

I think so. If you do a real quick estimation, Sanders is getting 75% in the caucus, Obama got 56% in the general election in 2012. .75 * .56 = .42. And Mitt Romney got 41% in 2012.

Caucusgoers are totally unrepresentative of even Washington Democrats.  Watch the pointless May primary have drastically higher turnout and Sanders do quite a bit worse.  Also, a huge proportion of Sanders supporters will vote Clinton if she's the nominee over a third-party challenge.

Grays Harbor 2008: 55% Obama
Grays Harbor 2016: 73% Sanders

That area typifies the kind of area Sanders would outperform Obama -- economically devastated whites.

I agree that Clinton will easily win WA in November. But let's dispel with the fiction that WA Democratic primaries, with zero delegates at stake, are more representative of voters in WA than caucuses. Also, we're not seeing votes here, we're seeing state delegates, so it's not accurate to say that turnout will be higher in the primary.
Logged
catographer
Megameow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,498
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: March 26, 2016, 05:19:29 PM »

A pattern in caucus states that Obama won in '08 such as Minnesota, Colorado, and Nebraska, is that Sanders improves over Obama in rural parts while Clinton improves in urban areas. Obama won Denver, Omaha and St. Paul by 60-70%. Sanders won them with over 50%. Now Clinton looks to improve a lot over Obama's 70%+ in King County (Seattle).
Logged
cwt
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 362


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: March 26, 2016, 05:20:39 PM »



I agree that Clinton will easily win WA in November. But let's dispel with the fiction that WA Democratic primaries, with zero delegates at stake, are more representative of voters in WA than caucuses. Also, we're not seeing votes here, we're seeing state delegates, so it's not accurate to say that turnout will be higher in the primary.

Not only that, anyone can show up to the caucus, but you have to register as a Democrat to vote in the primary. Why would independents bother registering for a meaningless primary?
Logged
Hnv1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,526


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: March 26, 2016, 05:21:12 PM »

will sanders get over 70 in king?
Doubt it. How much will he need to get in King to break 80% statewide?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: March 26, 2016, 05:22:52 PM »

Long lines for Hawaii caucus:

https://twitter.com/Maui_DetroitGal/status/713852359571480576

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Video of one of those lines:

https://twitter.com/CivilBeat/status/713848514841747457
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,232
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: March 26, 2016, 05:23:31 PM »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,545
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: March 26, 2016, 05:24:14 PM »
« Edited: March 26, 2016, 05:26:28 PM by Gass3268 »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.

One can only hope. Got nothing against soccer moms and they are welcome to come on board, but labor needs to be at the front.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: March 26, 2016, 05:25:38 PM »

Well, so much for King being good for Clinton. She's losing it 69-30 now.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: March 26, 2016, 05:25:51 PM »

Seattle's coming in at 69% Bernie
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,814


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: March 26, 2016, 05:25:57 PM »

if sanders ran third party, would a generic R compete with hilalry in WA?

damn these margins are insane.

That's not going to happen, but even so, no. WA is a Democratic state through and through.

Gore beat Bush by 6% in WA while Nader got 4% in 2000.

Your point is? Maine was similarly close in 2000, and Gore didn't even win Vermont by double-digits.

It likely stays D, even with a third party from the left, unless the 2016 political demographics have moved substantially from 2000.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,823


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: March 26, 2016, 05:26:25 PM »

Okanogan County 2008: 82%
Okanogan County 2016: 87%

His best county in the state so far.

Wahkiakum is his best county at 89.5%.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,616
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: March 26, 2016, 05:26:46 PM »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.

More like McGovern imo. Over-optimistic college youth learn to lose the hard way.

People who were college students in 1972, 1984, 1988, and 2004 say they were convinced that the Democratic candidate would win, and that they didn't know anyone who voted for the Republican, are shocked on election night, devolve into conspiracy theories, and eventually learn to accept that their candidate lost fair and square.

The college campus bubble is strong and has been around for 50 years. Young people no matter what decade they live in think the world revolves around them. I'm guilty of this sometimes myself. It's nothing new.
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: March 26, 2016, 05:26:57 PM »

King is now 69-30 Sanders with 12% in
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: March 26, 2016, 05:28:32 PM »

if sanders ran third party, would a generic R compete with hilalry in WA?

damn these margins are insane.

That's not going to happen, but even so, no. WA is a Democratic state through and through.

Gore beat Bush by 6% in WA while Nader got 4% in 2000.

Your point is? Maine was similarly close in 2000, and Gore didn't even win Vermont by double-digits.

It likely stays D, even with a third party from the left, unless the 2016 political demographics have moved substantially from 2000.

Oh, okay, I see what you're saying. Yeah, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't even be that close with a 3rd party challenger. WA has trended Democratic since 2000.
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,232
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: March 26, 2016, 05:28:34 PM »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.

More like McGovern imo. Over-optimistic college youth learn to lose the hard way.

People who were college students in 1972, 1984, 1988, and 2004 say they were convinced that the Democratic candidate would win, and that they didn't know anyone who voted for the Republican, are shocked on election night, devolve into conspiracy theories, and eventually learn to accept that their candidate lost fair and square.

The college campus bubble is strong and has been around for 50 years. Young people no matter what decade they live in think the world revolves around them. I'm guilty of this sometimes myself. It's nothing new.
Except it's not just college students. He's winning older Millennials who came of age under constant war and the 2008 crash (in which Democratic neoliberal policy in the 90s helped cause).

Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: March 26, 2016, 05:29:11 PM »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.

More like McGovern imo. Over-optimistic college youth learn to lose the hard way.

People who were college students in 1972, 1984, 1988, and 2004 say they were convinced that the Democratic candidate would win, and that they didn't know anyone who voted for the Republican, are shocked on election night, devolve into conspiracy theories, and eventually learn to accept that their candidate lost fair and square.

The college campus bubble is strong and has been around for 50 years. Young people no matter what decade they live in think the world revolves around them. I'm guilty of this sometimes myself. It's nothing new.

One can only hope we learn this in the primary rather than the general...
Logged
cwt
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 362


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: March 26, 2016, 05:29:41 PM »

Okanogan County 2008: 82%
Okanogan County 2016: 87%

His best county in the state so far.

Wahkiakum is his best county at 89.5%.

You're right. I'm looking at the results on The Guardian and the stupid little Bernie avatar was covering up Wahkiakum.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,545
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: March 26, 2016, 05:29:57 PM »

MSNBC calls Washington for Sanders.

AP/NYT does as well.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: March 26, 2016, 05:31:09 PM »

Bernie could be the Goldwater of the left. He might not succeed now, but his message is showing that the youth want to return this party to the party of labor, not soccer moms.

More like McGovern imo. Over-optimistic college youth learn to lose the hard way.

People who were college students in 1972, 1984, 1988, and 2004 say they were convinced that the Democratic candidate would win, and that they didn't know anyone who voted for the Republican, are shocked on election night, devolve into conspiracy theories, and eventually learn to accept that their candidate lost fair and square.

The college campus bubble is strong and has been around for 50 years. Young people no matter what decade they live in think the world revolves around them. I'm guilty of this sometimes myself. It's nothing new.

Weren't college students the most Republican demographic in 1988?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,006


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: March 26, 2016, 05:31:22 PM »

Soccer moms work too.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,318
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: March 26, 2016, 05:31:39 PM »

AP calls it for Sanders!
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: March 26, 2016, 05:32:29 PM »

CNN calls Washington for Sanders
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: March 26, 2016, 05:32:40 PM »

Looks like 73% of the vote is in in Alaska.  Do we know where these precincts are?  Neither CNN nor NYT seem to have regional breakdowns.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,007


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: March 26, 2016, 05:32:53 PM »


And, unlike Bernie's college student base, actually vote in midterm elections as well. Reorienting the party towards young people is stupid.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.