Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)

[madelka]

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.

[Gass3268]

Kittitas County 2008: Obama 66.9%
Kittitas County 2012: Sanders 77.4%

[Lief 🗽]

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)

You are joking, right? Those polls don't mean sh*t as Sanders has never been attacked from Hillary or the Republicans.

Yes, he has. Sure, he hasn't been attacked as much as Clinton has, but he's definitely been attacked.

He really hasn't. Clinton's sparred with him a bit in debates, but that's about it. He hasn't had a single negative ad ran against him.

[cinyc]

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.

Sanders has never had a problem winning Native American voters in the primaries.

[RightBehind]

You go Bernie!!!!!!!

[This account no longer in use.]

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.

Virginia is Leans D, Florida is Leans R.

[Gustaf]

Can we do moronic hack bots wars in some other thread and have actual results in this one?

[Pragmatic Conservative]

San Juan County Sanders 76-24

[madelka]

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.

Virginia is Leans D, Florida is Leans R.

Leans R if she does better than Obama with older Whites, white women and Hispanics? Yeah, sure.

[This account no longer in use.]

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.

Virginia is Leans D, Florida is Leans R.

Leans R if she does better than Obama with older Whites, white women and Hispanics? Yeah, sure.

By Leans R, I mean relative to the national margin. True swing states tend to be close to the national margin.

[Lief 🗽]

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.

Sanders has never had a problem winning Native American voters in the primaries.

I haven't looked at precinct data, but she won Apache and Navajo counties like huge margins in Arizona, both heavily Native American.

[Pragmatic Conservative]

Mason County Sanders 74-25

[Mr. Morden]

More Hawaii caucus pics:

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.

Sanders has never had a problem winning Native American voters in the primaries.

I haven't looked at precinct data, but she won Apache and Navajo counties like huge margins in Arizona, both heavily Native American.

Yep (66.39% to 28.84% in Navajo and 59.68% to 35.43%), though it doesn't necessarily represent how Native Americans in other states votes.

[Crumpets]

So, I'm just tuning in. Does anybody have precinct-by-precinct data? I want to see if Clinton hit viability in mine, because if not, my absentee vote went to Sanders.

[Flake]

Jefferson County 2008: 72% Obama
Jefferson County 2016: 71% Sanders

Kittitas County 2008: Obama 66.9%
Kittitas County 2012: Sanders 77.4%

Mason County 2008: 63% Obama
Mason County 2016: 74% Sanders

Island County 2008: 68% Obama
Island County 2016: 69% Sanders

San Juan County 2008: 81% Obama
San Juan County 2016: 76% Sanders

[Boston Bread]

Why does DDHQ have Sanders over 80% in AK and CNN under 80%?

[Flake]

What's the difference if Sanders wins 74% of the state compared to him winning 75% of the state?

[The Other Castro]

So, I'm just tuning in. Does anybody have precinct-by-precinct data? I want to see if Clinton hit viability in mine, because if not, my absentee vote went to Sanders.

Which precinct?

[Xing]

Unless the remaining King precincts are much stronger for Clinton, I think Sanders will easily stay above 70%.

[Comrade Funk]

The country was moving to the right when McGovern was nominated (Silent Majority). If anything, it's the opposite today. Even Hillary has had to shift farther left than expected in response. This isn't a one time thing. Democrats are sick of Democrats who use their votes and give nothing in return.

[Pragmatic Conservative]

Spokane starting to come in with 20% in it is 82-18 Sanders

[cwt]

So, I'm just tuning in. Does anybody have precinct-by-precinct data? I want to see if Clinton hit viability in mine, because if not, my absentee vote went to Sanders.

I don't think there's viability in WA at the precinct level.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.

Sanders has never had a problem winning Native American voters in the primaries.

I haven't looked at precinct data, but she won Apache and Navajo counties like huge margins in Arizona, both heavily Native American.

How dare you dispute jfern's gut feeling with numbers?

[Crumpets]

So, I'm just tuning in. Does anybody have precinct-by-precinct data? I want to see if Clinton hit viability in mine, because if not, my absentee vote went to Sanders.

Which precinct?

Well, I don't know how they're dividing up the precincts, because according to NYT, King county only has 17 precincts to report, which is way fewer than in general elections. Usually, my precinct number is 36-1813, but if it's by zip code, then it's 91899.