Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:46:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 30
Author Topic: Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)  (Read 44003 times)
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #400 on: March 01, 2016, 09:42:19 PM »

Ohp, here comes Colorado.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #401 on: March 01, 2016, 09:42:20 PM »

Yeah, Clinton is essentially 20,000 ahead in MA already. Why isn't this being called?

They waited ages to call Oklahoma even when it was clear Bernie won. They're just being careful I guess.

I guess sometimes as Oldies has been preaching, it's occasionally better to be safe than sorry especially when the exit polls fail you.  They really don't want a 2000 Round 2.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #402 on: March 01, 2016, 09:42:40 PM »

I would not have expected Clinton to win Williamstown, even narrowly.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #403 on: March 01, 2016, 09:42:45 PM »

The first results from the CO Caucus are beginning to trickle in.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #404 on: March 01, 2016, 09:43:36 PM »

While I've always been in for Hillary and wanted her to win, I do admit the nerd in me wanted to see a somewhat competitive primary mostly for analysis and data purposes.

Her best town in NH was Hannover. Seems like the elite/intellectuals dont like Sanders. He has far more appeal with the rural and the poor white voters. Than in suburbia and wealthy towns.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,246
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #405 on: March 01, 2016, 09:44:36 PM »

Oklahoma! OK in my book. Smiley
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,723
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #406 on: March 01, 2016, 09:44:46 PM »

While I've always been in for Hillary and wanted her to win, I do admit the nerd in me wanted to see a somewhat competitive primary mostly for analysis and data purposes.

Her best town in NH was Hannover. Seems like the elite/intellectuals dont like Sanders. He has far more appeal with the rural and the poor white voters. Than in suburbia and wealthy towns.

Just like Trump, using fear and hate (in different ways) to rake in uneducated voters.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #407 on: March 01, 2016, 09:45:01 PM »

Where are the votes out right now in Massachussetts? The AP ticker on Google says 41%. If they're out west I can see why no one is calling it yet.

Mostly west & Sanders would probably win most. Sanders area wise has swept most of Mass but the Boston Area have a huge HUGE lead for Hillary, 20K is almost impossible to make-up.

I think they should call it, West Mass does not have that big a population to make a difference
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #408 on: March 01, 2016, 09:45:49 PM »

Yeah, Clinton is essentially 20,000 ahead in MA already. Why isn't this being called?

A lot of places haven't come in yet. This could still be another Iowa.

Anyway, what surprises me is that Holyoke is basically tied between Clinton and Sanders (with Clinton having a slight edge). I would have expected that to be a bigger Clinton win. Meanwhile, Berkshire County seems a lot more divided than I'd expect; I'd expect it to go heavily for Sanders.

Also, it looks like that poll putting Sanders ahead in Worcester County might have been correct. This map isn't looking anything like what I expected.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #409 on: March 01, 2016, 09:49:42 PM »

Sanders doing alright in CO. Could Denver could save Clinton like other major cities?
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #410 on: March 01, 2016, 09:49:57 PM »

Sanders up 60-30 in the CD-1 in MN.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #411 on: March 01, 2016, 09:50:23 PM »

Oklahoma has socialist roots.
Debs 1912 and Benson 1916 had ~16%
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,801
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #412 on: March 01, 2016, 09:51:31 PM »

Clinton is expanding her lead in Boston proper - gone from 12 points up a few minutes ago now to 14.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,801
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #413 on: March 01, 2016, 09:52:06 PM »

Clinton at 14% in VT. Come on 1%!
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #414 on: March 01, 2016, 09:52:59 PM »

I think Bernie underperformed a bit tonight. Even with winning, OK, CO, MN, and VT, he lost TX by a huge margin and MA is still up for grabs. If he gets MA, this could get interesting.
Logged
RaphaelDLG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,687
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #415 on: March 01, 2016, 09:53:12 PM »

We won't get entrance/exits for CO or MN, will we?
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #416 on: March 01, 2016, 09:53:30 PM »

Sanders ahead 53-42 in CO!
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,702
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #417 on: March 01, 2016, 09:53:36 PM »
« Edited: March 01, 2016, 09:55:08 PM by Sorenroy »


Looks like there are some issues with the NYT live map for MN. It's showing a Clinton lead, but the only numbers in tilt Sanders.

Edit: Yeah, the state map is reporting less precincts.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #418 on: March 01, 2016, 09:53:54 PM »

Very disappointed in Mass, this could have been a good day, 4 or 5 wins would have been decent, especially with the surprisingly good result in Ok.

Mass had decent turnout as well, not Obama level again but not bad like Nevada or SC. Boston killed this fight - Sanders has to look at his strategy, he swept Mass & got beaten soundly due to a Boston washout
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,082
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #419 on: March 01, 2016, 09:55:52 PM »

I think Bernie underperformed a bit tonight. Even with winning, OK, CO, MN, and VT, he lost TX by a huge margin and MA is still up for grabs. If he gets MA, this could get interesting.
Bernie hasn't won Minnesota and Colorado, at least not yet.

Only Vermont and Oklahoma (and New Hampshire).
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #420 on: March 01, 2016, 09:57:13 PM »

https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/704862252361392128
Y'all, Decision Desk has called MA for Clinton.
Logged
yourelection
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 436


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #421 on: March 01, 2016, 09:58:31 PM »

I think Bernie underperformed a bit tonight. Even with winning, OK, CO, MN, and VT, he lost TX by a huge margin and MA is still up for grabs. If he gets MA, this could get interesting.

TX is one of the major factors tonight. Hillary might ge more delegates from Texas alone, than Sanders gets in all his state wins.

Even if Sanders gets Mass, the delegate win will be neglegable.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #422 on: March 01, 2016, 09:58:57 PM »

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #423 on: March 01, 2016, 10:00:00 PM »

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.
White people and guns.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #424 on: March 01, 2016, 10:00:03 PM »

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.
That's the reason why Sanders won in OK. He won conservative dems by 30 points.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 30  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 11 queries.