|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 04, 2020, 04:46:44 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO: Public Policy Polling: Udall ahead of all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: CO: Public Policy Polling: Udall ahead of all Republicans  (Read 1908 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 18, 2013, 05:24:15 pm »

New Poll: Colorado Senator by Public Policy Polling on 2013-04-14

Summary: D: 48%, R: 41%, U: 13%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2013, 05:27:35 pm »

Udall approval- 50/33

Udall- 48%
Beauprez- 41%

Udall- 49%
Gardener- 39%

Udall- 50%
Gessler- 37%

Udall- 49%
Norton- 38%

Udall- 50%
Stapleton- 37%

Udall- 50%
Suthers- 38%

Udall- 51%
Tancredo- 39%

Udall- 50%
Tipton- 37%


I have no idea who's most likely to run, but I entered the numbers for Udall/Beauprez.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,518
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2013, 05:34:18 pm »

What a sorry bench for Republicans in Colorado. Guess Udall keeps his seat.
Logged
Scott
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,275
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2013, 05:39:09 pm »

Norton was considered very competitive in 2010, IIRC.  I guess her time has passed.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2013, 05:45:17 pm »

Norton was considered very competitive in 2010, IIRC.  I guess her time has passed.

49% don't have an opinion of her and with those who do, she's at 20/32.

Actually, going back to March 2010, she was at a similar 25/35 spread but was tying Bennet. I think any perceptions of her strength have more to do with 2010 being a good Republican year as opposed to her merits as a candidate.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,518
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2013, 06:30:39 pm »
« Edited: April 18, 2013, 06:32:29 pm by Wisard Ekstraordinær Maxwell »

Norton was considered very competitive in 2010, IIRC.  I guess her time has passed.

Norton is a robot Romney type.


49% don't have an opinion of her and with those who do, she's at 20/32.

Actually, going back to March 2010, she was at a similar 25/35 spread but was tying Bennet. I think any perceptions of her strength have more to do with 2010 being a good Republican year as opposed to her merits as a candidate.

She was probably tying Bennet because it was a good Republican year, and because Bennet himself is a massive robot.
Logged
A-Bob
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,780
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2013, 05:56:04 pm »

Norton was considered very competitive in 2010, IIRC.  I guess her time has passed.

Norton is a robot Romney type.


49% don't have an opinion of her and with those who do, she's at 20/32.

Actually, going back to March 2010, she was at a similar 25/35 spread but was tying Bennet. I think any perceptions of her strength have more to do with 2010 being a good Republican year as opposed to her merits as a candidate.

She was probably tying Bennet because it was a good Republican year, and because Bennet himself is a massive robot.

^ This could not be more perfectly said.
Logged
badgate
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2013, 07:21:01 pm »

Likely D Kiki
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,398
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2013, 01:28:11 am »

The GOP in CO needs to clean house and start over.  Screw this state.
Logged
sg0508
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,750
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2013, 07:30:29 pm »

If Udall is at 50/33 in terms of favorable/unfavorable, that's a pretty strong spread, particularly in a state where neither party is at a distinct advantage.
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,192
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2013, 07:54:13 pm »

Dominating.
Logged
A-Bob
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,780
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2013, 04:52:22 pm »


This poll is from April and none of those republicans are even candidates or going to be candidates
Logged
Snowstalker's Last Stand
Snowstalker
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,300
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2013, 04:54:21 pm »

I'd love to see Udall vs. Buck numbers. Tongue
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,521
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.23, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2013, 05:01:42 pm »

The GOP in Colorado just can't seem to do anything, just like Minnesota, its a slightly democratic leaning state, but the democrats dominate like its Massachusetts or Maryland. Its really just sad, and this seat will likely be Udall's to keep.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines