1968 Party Nominations
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 11:39:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1968 Party Nominations
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Poll
Question: Here we go again.
#1
Republican Nomination: Vice President Barry M. Goldwater of Arizona
 
#2
Republican Nomination: Senator Richard M. Nixon of California
 
#3
Republican Nomination: Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York
 
#4
Republican Nomination: Governor James A. Rhodes of Ohio
 
#5
Republican Nomination: Governor John Volpe of Massachusetts
 
#6
Republican Nomination: Governor George W. Romney of Michigan
 
#7
Republican Nomination: Senator Clifford Case of New Jersey
 
#8
Democratic Nomination: Senator Hubert H. Humphrey of Minnesota
 
#9
Democratic Nomination: Senator Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota
 
#10
Democratic Nomination: Senator Robert F. Kennedy of New York
 
#11
Democratic Nomination: Senator Stephen M. Young of Ohio
 
#12
Democratic Nomination: Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas
 
#13
Democratic Nomination: Senator George Smathers of Florida
 
#14
Democratic Nomination: Senator George S. McGovern of South Dakota
 
#15
Democratic Nomination: Mr. Channing E. Phillips of Washington, D.C.
 
#16
Democratic Nomination: Coach Paul N. "Bear" Bryant of Alabama
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: 1968 Party Nominations  (Read 4401 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 05, 2013, 03:52:53 PM »

Ah, here we are in good ol' 1968, a year marred by war, domestic turbulence, and the death of a few well known American leaders. From a real life perspective, the situation is basically now reversed.


If you're a finicky voter, it's advised you read the specific stances of the candidates. However, as always, the success of certain folks will cause the situation to change.

While four years ago President Margaret Chase Smith was able to win re-election by a thin margin, her good will with the nation seems to have worn out its stay. The situation in Vietnam has only deepened since 1964 with continued escalation and an ever worsening view of the war. While a good number of Americans resent the "hippies" camped outside the White House, they too are uncomfortable with this war. With the constitution barring President Smith from seeking a third term, the field is wide open in both parties.

For the Republicans, Vice President Goldwater will have more than a hard time seeking the nomination. Despite continued gravitas among his core following, the fact that he has served under an administration that he has been at odds with is a sticky situation to be in. Nevertheless, his campaign has chosen the themes of a) continuing American prosperity, and b) a decisive and victorious end to the war in Vietnam. Meanwhile, prominent Republican Senator Richard Nixon, a foreign policy leader in the party, has chosen to seek the nomination, having long been denied a spot on the ticket despite his hard work and high visibility. He too is touting the phrase "Peace, With Honor" and is attempting to use blue collar discontent, both with the hippies and with the administration, to his advantage. Nelson Rockefeller is back again. He warns that the other contenders--Goldwater, Reagan, Nixon--associated with the Republican right wing, are unelectable. He instead proposes a continued moderate-to-liberal Republican path to victory like those pioneered by Eisenhower and Smith, and in doing so promises a "continued record of progress and triumph, both at home and abroad". For the first time, the issue of abortion is beginning to come up in national debate, as brought by some opponents of Rockefeller. Running as a "conservative alternative", California's favorite son Governor Ronald Reagan is testing the presidential waters. Depending on his and his opponents' success, he may act in his own interests or instead pledge his delegates to Goldwater. The man who sticks out of the field is Michigan Governor George Romney. While earlier having been ambiguous on Vietnam, he has now come out in favor of American withdrawal, taking a more dovish stance than straddlers like Nixon and Rockefeller. He is hoping to use this anti-establishment stance combined with his record as a successful industrial state governor to forge a path to the nomination.

The Democrats meanwhile have assembled a largely anti-war field in opposition to the Smith administration's policies. Senator Eugene McCarthy became the first of the anti-war legislators to hop into the race, upsetting potential front-runners Hubert H. Humphrey and Robert F. Kennedy. Humphrey, as in 1960, is running on economic issues and has taken a muddled stance on Vietnam that has left both sides unsatisfied. Meanwhile, Kennedy had only more recently taken the anti-war position, in time for it to hopefully help his candidacy catch fire. Kennedy, the brother of 1964 Vice Presidential nominee John F. Kennedy, instead originally made the focus of his campaign urban issues. Now having added the war to that list, Kennedy is hoping to steal minorities from Humphrey while winning McCarthy's dove vote. Senator George Smathers meanwhile is running as a conservative favorite son in his home state of Florida. McGovern is running his own favorite son campaign and is a vocal anti-war Senator in the vein of McCarthy.

**As always, voice your preference for VP. If I've left out descriptions of anyone you're interested in, or you want some clarification, don't be afraid to ask.**
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2013, 03:56:47 PM »

McGovern/RFK
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2013, 03:57:37 PM »

Cathcon, Smith isn't barred for serving another term.  She served less than half of Ike's last one.  This is why Johnson could run in 68, even though he dropped out.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2013, 04:00:32 PM »

Cathcon, Smith isn't barred for serving another term.  She served less than half of Ike's last one.  This is why Johnson could run in 68, even though he dropped out.

The late President Eisenhower died in October, 1962.
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2013, 04:03:44 PM »

Cathcon, Smith isn't barred for serving another term.  She served less than half of Ike's last one.  This is why Johnson could run in 68, even though he dropped out.

The late President Eisenhower died in October, 1962.

You bastard Tongue  (I say that jokingly) I suppose that's an acceptable answer though, even if it makes me grumble.

Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2013, 04:05:00 PM »

Torn between Goldwater, Romney, and McCarthy. Went with McCarthy.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2013, 04:05:17 PM »

My choice should be obvious. Tongue

But regardless of who gets the nomination, Reagan for veep!
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2013, 04:05:32 PM »

McGovern/Morse or McGovern/Gruening! McCarthy with either of them is eminently acceptable as well.
Logged
Incipimus iterum
1236
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2013, 04:06:26 PM »

Romney/Hatfield
Logged
OAM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 597


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2013, 04:08:04 PM »

Anywho, in this case, I'm voting for RFK, for a strong candidate who knows how to get things done.  If he does not win, I wish him as VP.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,248
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2013, 04:12:30 PM »


Or McGovern/Morse.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,774
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2013, 04:14:34 PM »

Romney/Reagan
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,501
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2013, 04:16:34 PM »

McGovern/McCarthy!
Logged
Clarence Boddicker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 355


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2013, 04:24:23 PM »

RFK/Al Gore Sr.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2013, 04:29:33 PM »

McGovern/Morse.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,384
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2013, 04:49:05 PM »

All right, I'll jump on the McGovern bandwagon...

Humphrey for veep, please! Cry
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2013, 05:06:42 PM »
« Edited: April 05, 2013, 05:09:51 PM by ModerateCoward »

Mr. Channing E. Phillips/McGovern

I believe this is the most left-wing ticket possible. Also it's that we elect a black again.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2013, 05:15:57 PM »

LBJ/HHH
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 05, 2013, 05:37:38 PM »

All right, I'll jump on the McGovern bandwagon...

Humphrey for veep, please! Cry

Sorry dawg. That doesn't fly for a litany (or like two or three) of reasons.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 05, 2013, 05:38:24 PM »

Nixon's the One.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2013, 05:43:16 PM »

Goldwater/Hatfield (And yes, I know how much they conflict, but both were great in different ways).
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2013, 05:50:26 PM »
« Edited: April 05, 2013, 05:53:49 PM by Supersonic »

I feel George Romney would be the best placed to peel centre-left voters. Him or Rockefeller. Voted Romney anyhow. Voting Goldwater, Reagan or Nixon = landslide loss.

Romney/Rockefeller
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2013, 06:00:24 PM »

HHH/McGovern
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2013, 06:44:54 PM »

Romney/Rockefeller!!!!
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2013, 06:52:24 PM »

As a New Jerseyan, I proudly cast a vote for favorite son Clifford Case.

Hatfield for VP.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 10 queries.